this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
731 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19243 readers
2362 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 189 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Fucking of course he did. Jesus christ.

This is why I say that the DNC is fully dead. AOC and the rest of the young progressives in Congress need to just get with Sanders and straight up found a new party. This is so fucking dumb.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I was thinking that Trump was going to be the end of the Republican party, and the Democrats would pick up the slightly reasonable conservative position. Instead Trump made the Democratic party if playing to the right a farce and maybe that'll end the Democratic party. I'm curious to see where things go. It seems like one of the two have to collapse eventually.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

the slightly reasonable conservative position.

A little light genocide. Mild indentured servitude. A judicious amount of crippling poverty. Means tested mass incarceration. Just the right amount of war profiteering. Seasonal witch hunts.

You know, moderate conservatism.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 121 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

That's why Pelosi chose them, specially over AOC. She's the other side of the US oligarchy, the one that's ok with the slice of cake they have now and don't want to push the US into a complete dictatorship just to try to get more. She's one of the people in the democratic party that's most abusing federal insider trading and conflicts of interests.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Seriously. She's just a smarter oligarch than Trump. She's smart enough to realize that keeping a flawed and corrupt democracy is better than no democracy at all. She realizes there's no real point in having wealth if you and yours have to live in some totalitarian shithole. And also, wealth tends to be very vulnerable to arbitrary confiscation in authoritarian regimes. Trump is an oligarch, but he's just stupid and prideful enough to think that he and his will always remain at the peak of the pyramid, and that autocracy will work in his favor.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

She’s smart enough to realize that keeping a flawed and corrupt democracy is better than no democracy at all.

Playing Jenga with my democracy, smugly certain I won't be the one who pulls the last block.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pelosi and all other geriatric politicians need to retire

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 102 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We can thank Nancy Pelosi and her boomer wisdom for this.

The fewer boomers in Congress, the better.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is she even a boomer or silent generation? Not sure about her exact age but I think Hitler was winning the war when she was born.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 1 week ago

Boomer is a state of mind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 101 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

He's also recently announced that he's undergoing chemotherapy for esophagus cancer, which has a very low survival rate. It's bad enough that the DNC will only allow corrupt geriatrics to hold the levers of power, but could they at least have found one that wasn't actively dying?

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Esophageal cancer only has a very low survival rate in the late stages. If caught early it's about 50%

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

According to Wikipedia:

In general, the prognosis of esophageal cancer is quite poor, because most patients present with advanced disease. By the time the first symptoms (such as difficulty swallowing) appear, the disease has already progressed. The overall five-year survival rate (5YSR) in the United States is around 15%, with most people dying within the first year of diagnosis.

According to Connolly:

A few days ago, I learned I joined the ranks of millions of Americans. I have cancer of the esophagus. It was a surprise because, except for some intermittent abdominal aches and pains, I had no symptoms.

So, I'm not a doctor, but it sounds like he's showing early symptoms, he only has a 15% or living more than 5 years, and he's more likely than not to die within the next year. But even if you're right, a 74-year-old, who is undergoing chemotherapy and has a coin-flip chance of survival, is leading one of the most important committees in Congress.

I'm not trying to be cruel to the guy; cancer sucks and it's awful he's going through this. But given how narrow the Republican lead is in the House, it's irresponsible to have him just stay in Congress at all, since he might miss crucial votes. The Oversight Committee is going to be incredibly important for investigating the Trump administration, and having the top Democrat on the panel be a man going through serious health issues is insane.

[–] xerazal@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

"irresponsible you say? 😏" - Dem leadership

[–] joenforcer@midwest.social 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah, so if you catch it early it's a coin flip? Nice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 73 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The new and improved democratic party is back in business everyone!

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 week ago

🌎👩🏼‍🚀🔫👩🏼‍🚀

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I hope she trips again, and this time, never gets up again.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 27 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It should be illegal to own stocks as a Senator.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Honestly, at this point we just need to dissolve the US in its entirety. I no longer believe it can be saved. We need to grant all 50 states full independence. They can then come back together and form whatever new nation or nations they want. The existing union is broken beyond all repair. It can no longer be salvaged.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago

I like where your head is at, but that's a terrible idea that will just lead to all the Red States going full jihad on "others"

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What actually happens if the Union splits is that corporate interests start buying states. If you think we live in a cyberpunk dystopia now, just imagine what would happen if Amazon owned Mississippi through Georgia.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ramsorge@discuss.online 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So, they meet the qualifications. Got it.

Dems do insider trading, Reps do rape. Nice people.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 13 points 1 week ago

And both of them fuck you over and over.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Phew, can you imagine these guys winning the presidency?

Wait.. they’re the good ones!?

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 24 points 1 week ago

They are mostly corporate neoliberal centrists. There are very few actual liberals or progressives left in the Democratic Party. They can’t deliver on any meaningful legislation because it always gets shot down by the Republicans or even their own party.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 32 points 1 week ago

No wonder Pelosi liked him.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

On top of being 74 and one month fresh off a throat cancer diagnosis...

Edit:

He announced it the day after he won the election, it would be a huge coincidence if that's the day he received, he more likely just his it from voters...

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Fucking hope motherfucker dies screaming. The Democratic Party is done.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Being in the senate and congress will become increasingly a status symbol and effective tool for getting health care for oneself and one's family. Otherwise it will be about as useful as it was during the slow slide from the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire. But being America it will happen much faster.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago

I have an idea:

  • get people who desperately need health insurance together
  • elect one of them for Congress
  • they perform the minimum amount of days needed to get health insurance for life
  • resign
  • Governor sets special election
  • next person runs for office
  • repeat until everyone has insurance
[–] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

They've really streamlined the process.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

So an unsurprising pick for the "good" party.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Sounds like a perfect match for that shithead pelosi.

[–] solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

Well, that's why he's qualified.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

You couldn't write this and have someone think it was realistic.

What the actual fuck DNC? Pelosi? Corrupt pieces of shit just protecting themselves

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Why do you think he was Pelosi’s pick? lmao, that evil greedy power hungry bitch

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

You know I thought it was low effort cringe when I first heard "demacrips and rebloodpicans" in a body count song, but Im starting to like it more by the day

BuT iT wAs HiS tUrN!

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m gonna vote so much harder now. /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Would you people be done with this group of inept septuagenarians called the DNC. Pluck out a liberal from 30-40 years ago and show them everything their going to lose and they would puke in their mouth. It's the same people that have virtually given our government away since Reagan. They fucking suck at this, be done with the DNC and don't give me any two party bullshit. What you have is one party where they both desperately drive you into the others arms. There won't be a two party system moving forward. Mark my words, we are done with free and fair elections.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›