this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
113 points (95.9% liked)

News

23661 readers
3484 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The global auto industry, once buoyed by pandemic-era shortages and high prices, is now facing significant challenges.

Major automakers like Nissan, Ford, and Volkswagen are cutting thousands of jobs and closing factories due to falling demand, competition from Chinese carmakers, and rising protectionism.

Chinese brands, offering cheaper and innovative vehicles, are gaining market share, pressuring Western automakers, particularly in China.

The shift to electric vehicles (EVs) is proving costly, with sluggish demand in some markets and government subsidies declining. Some companies, like GM and Toyota, are faring better with strategic EV and hybrid models.

Non-paywall link

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

But that era is over and the industry has reverted to its prepandemic state, with too many carmakers chasing too few buyers.

That’s their own damn fault. They all got this idea that every car brand could be a luxury brand. They left behind consumers. They cut their affordable models and have left the sedan and even now many compact segment vehicles in the dust. Consumers should now leave them behind in turn. The future can’t possibly be luxury SUVs, pickups, and sports cars for everyone.

Corporate executives couldn’t see past the next quarter. And now, I won’t be surprised if governments force their losses to be socialized. Stellantis executive quit recently after seeing the writing on the wall. Make the money, let it crash and burn. That was always the plan.

Fuck em and the SUV they came in. Eat shit.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Regular-ass pickup trucks are really hard to buy, too. Trying to find a F150 XL on a lot is tough, and the pricing isn't that much better. Too many luxury trucks, too few work trucks. The PRO dealers don't even want to talk to someone looking for a single truck in my experience or I'd just buy from the dealer with nothing but plain white on the lot.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Indeed. If you want a giant-ass ego-mobile you'll find plenty, but a truck to actually get work done? You might have better luck finding a good van these days. It's a shame.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh man, the sprinter/transit thing is insane tho. Sure they are nice vans but the price is WAY higher than the Econoline/Savanah generation.

[–] krelvar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

You'd probably get a discount if you promise to live in it and become a vanfluencer. Make sure to be quirky!

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah I have no clue why a compact, affordable, hybrid truck like the Maverick just can't be made fast enough and flies off the lot.

Surely it's not being a compact truck. Or it being affordable for new. Of course, it's not also having a hybrid option.

No, it's gotta be anything else other than that. So make sure there are more of the huge, expensive, gas chugging things on the lot.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You won't get any sympathy from me for the Maverick.

It's. Not. A. Truck.

I need a truck for work, not weekend runs to the lumberyard.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Ok, so it's not made for you. That wasn't the point of the post. The point was that an affordable small compact truck with a hybrid option sells like hot cakes, yet Ford wonders why a 100k lightning sits on the lot.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

Perhaps companies should have “rainy day” funds in case of a downturn like they tell average citizens.

🤔

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

An interesting thing I found out from this article is that the drop in demand is due to non-Chinese companies not being able to compete in the Chinese market. The incoming tariff war will only make this worse. Donald Trump may be thinking he is putting American Manufacturing first, but in reality he is cutting off American companies from the largest market in the world.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 29 points 1 week ago

He doesn’t actually care about America first, just Donald first. Tariffs are merely a bargaining chip that he can use to encourage bribes in order to get exemptions, or a cynical market play that makes him and his masters money at the expense of the economy . Or hell, the likeliest could just be Putin tugging on the leash to get him to hurt the US economy as much as possible, though if the energy markets bottom falls out, Putin might be in actual trouble

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Donald Trump may be thinking

Doubtful.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

I'm positive his "brain" consists of two knife welding rabies infected rats in Nazi uniforms fighting over rancid cheese.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Part of the demand drop is that automakers aren't making a product consumers want to buy. They got lazy during the pandemic, and now that the sugar rush has ended their “cutting out entire product lines that appealed to the common buyer” has come home to roost.

You can only sell so many $100k pickups.

EDIT: Added quotes to make the sentence easier to read. My grammar is weird.

[–] Tower@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Not just a product that consumers don't want to buy, but one that most consumers can't buy because of high prices and low wages.

I purchased my current car used. I plan to purchase my next car used. The new car I bought in 2016 will likely be the last brand new car I ever buy (I know buying used typically makes more sense anyways, but the point still stands).

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're building to skirt regulations (efficiency requirements scale related to vehicle size) instead of just making the small reliable vehicles that almost everyone actually needs. The increased size of the average vehicle also leads some people to prefer larger vehicles themselves even if they don't need them. Try driving a smaller car and see how much more often you're blinded by headlights, both oncoming and from behind.

I don't know what the solution is but I'm glad to hear car makers are not seeing massive success with the current oversized lineups.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I drive a Prius and the number LED projector headlights at eye level is too damn high.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 week ago

well there's a simple solution to that: make cars that people want to buy.

I was in the market for a car recently. I wanted a small city car. All the big players have now is crossovers and suvs.

So that's why I got a chinese made vehicle. It was what I wanted, and it exists. The reason I didn't buy something european is because none of them make anything I'd want to buy anymore. Maybe the fiat 500, but that's a bit too pricey, imo.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good, let's not bail them out again. Let the market decide.

I'm paying whoever can give me a barebones 4 banger turbo diesel mini truck/van, ute, or station wagon please. With a manual transmission preferably.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Thrived"?

Somebody wasn't working in the industry during the pandemic I guess...

Parts shortages driven by the one-two punch of the pandemic + the invasion of Ukraine led to a massive inventory of cars that could not be sold because manufacturing wasn't complete:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ford-motor-losses-chip-shortage-rivian/

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/ukraine-invasion-hurts-flow-wire-harnesses-carmakers-2022-03-02/

Then, the used car market exploded because people were unable to complete lease returns as there weren't new cars to trade in for.

https://www.carscoops.com/2024/07/dealers-brace-for-the-next-pandemic-related-supply-issue-fewer-lease-returns/

So, no, the automotive industry was not "thriving" during the pandemic.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Also the pandemic is one of the things that broke Elon.

[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Can confirm, I waited 6 months for a new car delivery (off catalogue, it wasn't anything fancy or custom) and when delivered it lacked some electronic functions they promised at sale. At least I got a discount.

[–] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 week ago

There is no reason they should have thrived during the pandemic, they should have been taking a hit just like the customers. If they were taking increased profits, then it's because they were screwing over customers during a challenging time.

Any auto maker that focuses on practical/efficient/affordable will benefit in the long run, and the fact that another country is more focused on that, makes the real threat of competition.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago
[–] hark@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Automakers enjoyed huge profit margins with the shortages since they could charge much more for fewer vehicles. Now that supply is back up, there is nothing justifying these ridiculous prices and they're crying. Too bad. Also funny how they had the government shut out Chinese competition in domestic markets but they're still losing in the China market even though there aren't 100% tariffs on their vehicles there.

[–] WhyFlip@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Prices on new vehicles are totally fucking outrageous. So sorry the $10K markup is no longer sustainable.