this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
399 points (99.0% liked)

News

23673 readers
3505 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Missouri state Representative Michael Davis has introduced the “Donald J. Trump Election Qualification Act,” a bill allowing individuals convicted of felonies to run for public office if otherwise qualified.

The legislation, named after Donald Trump, seeks to repeal a 2015 state law barring felons from candidacy in local or statewide elections.

Davis argues the law should align with Trump’s election as president despite his 34 felony convictions in New York.

He advocates for reintegration of felons into society, emphasizing their rights as citizens to participate in government and elections.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 176 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If they can run for office, then they can vote.

[–] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 105 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

IMHO all citizens, in or out of jail should be able to vote. If one is a citizen, one should be automatically registered to vote at 18 yo.

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 37 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

i’d go as far as voting at 16, since that’s the age at which you can pay income tax

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

IMHO so should residents.
If you live here, you're affected by politics, so you should get a say.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

several states stripped non citizen residents of their local election voting rights this past election. i find it frankly disturbing

[–] TwentySeven@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Disturbing that you have to be a citizen to vote? I thought that was a given.

Yes, I am aware that there are a few municipalities out there that allow non citizens to vote, and I'm not necessarily opposed to that, but I do find it strange.

I certainly wouln't move to another country and expect to be allowed to vote without being a citizen!

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 13 points 2 weeks ago

it's very common in Europe. Not for national elections, but for local elections so that residents have a say in their schools, roads, etc.

It could be argued that it's stranger for someone in Arizona to vote for Donald Trump and take away train funding in NYC, than for a Canadian citizen to vote for train funding in their own city in the US.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

it's disturbing that these were people we enfranchised to vote in elections that directly effected them based on their resident status and contributions to local taxes. it's disturbing that people actively voted to disenfrachise their neighbors, treat members of their community as if they were hostile agents illgally voting in elections they weren't voting in. it's disturbing how easy it was for people to frame it like it was weird for non-citizen residents to vote in local elections because in national elections you need to be a citizen when for literal millennia people have had voices in their local communities and this is actually some 20th/21st century bullshit people are pushing that residency has never been a factor in community decision making.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you weren't aware, there is a reason that politicians lobby to have big prisons put in their state/district: The census counts the inmates as citizens of the district to be included when making decisions about appropriating funds, but (in most states) they do not get a vote.

So you ostensibly get thousands of people who count toward your population for appropriations purposes, but you don't need to even bother trying to woo as voters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Felons actually can vote in Missouri if they've completed their sentence. This includes parole and probation terms.

Permanent disenfranchisement is actually less common than people think. It's still too common by far, and we need to revisit the reasoning for disenfranchisement while incarcerated or on probation, but in most of the country a felony doesn't prevent voting permanently.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump didn't complete his sentence

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm not super interested in defending trump or Missouri, but he was neither sentenced in general nor convicted of a felony, or running for office, in Missouri.

So other than the name and inspiration, none of this even applies to him.

I was just pointing out that in Missouri, felons aren't completely disenfranchised. Yay marginally better civil rights than a lot of people assumed!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 63 points 2 weeks ago

“I believe that we should punish those who do wrong, but once they’ve completed the terms of their sentence, we should allow individuals to reintegrate into society,” Davis told Fox2Now.

Better headline would be this Republican Representative low key just said Trump should be in jail.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 62 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Wait a minute, if that 2015 law stands, how come Trump was on the presidential ballot in MO? He is a convicted felon.

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 47 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, the constitution clearly excludes Trump from being president due to his insurrection coup. But the Supreme Court is a bunch of hacks and laws don’t matter.

[–] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 18 points 2 weeks ago

Things that make one go “hmm?”

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It applied to local and state offices but apparently not federal.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 11 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Nope, that's not it:

No person shall qualify as a candidate for elective public office in the state of Missouri who has been found guilty of or pled guilty to a felony under the federal laws of the United States of America or to a felony under the laws of this state or an offense committed in another state that would be considered a felony in this state.

https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=115.306&bid=34682

[–] lukes26@lemm.ee 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Candidate for elective public office in the state of Missouri" could be read either as can't be a candidate on the ballot in Missouri or can't be a candidate for a state position. It depends on if it means [candidate for public office] in Missouri or candidate for [public office in Missouri].

I don't like how laws are always written very formally like that, I feel like English (or any language tbh) is able to be misinterpreted easily enough as is, and the stilted way it's used in legal speak just leads to questions and misunderstandings like this. I'd much rather they be written as plainly as is possible and in ways that attempted to remove ambiguity instead of add it, though a lot of the time that's the point I imagine lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

With regards to the words "in the state of missouri" they likely conveniently interpretted it as running for an elected office that directly oversees missouri such as sherrifs, judges, state senators etc rather than a position that isnt within the jurisdiction of the state.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago

“I believe that we should punish those who do wrong, but once they’ve completed the terms of their sentence, we should allow individuals to reintegrate into society,” Davis told Fox2Now.

So not at all like Trump.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 44 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

He won't be old enough, but that would be fucking incredible if he ran.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Apparently all you need to do to evade prison is make an earnest run at being President. Let's make a Super PAC and get the ball rolling, we've got a real American patriot to save.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

On the one hand I am absolutely for the abolishment of many felonies. And reintegration and Felons into society. But on the other hand f*** Donald Trump why can't Missouri do anything actually clearly good and not name s*** after unrepentant fascists.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

FWIW we in this shithole of a state have little to no power even if we vote for things. We vote down every "Right to Work" amendment they've shoved on the ballot for decades and it just keeps popping back up.

We passed expansion of Medicaid and they simply did nothing to expand it.

We're all waiting for how they shut down the abortion access amendment that just passed in November.

They force state control of police in the big cities to oppress the brown and black people. They gerrymander the districts. They make voting extremely difficult. They brutalize peaceful protests. Call the national guard in for a mouse fart in the wrong zip code.

It is a fascist dictatorship.

But please, everyone, stop thinking that we here endorse this ferkakte theocracy. We are fighting. We always have. The boot has been systemically on our throats for decades.

It is hard to leave too. The cost of living is so low here that it makes it difficult to even move across the river into Illinois. It is a trap. A trap most of us are born into.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

As a resident I agree 100%. There's just too much lead poisoning state for things to get better any time soon. 🤐

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

You gotta admit it's pretty funny though.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

white Felons, I assume.

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago

Trump is soooo inspirational! You can be a pedo a rapist a fraud and still become president of the United States!

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago

All of a sudden they care about felons when their God king became one lmao

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If the United States was a family, Missouri would be the creepy bachelor uncle who drives a pickup with flags, won't set foot out of the house without a gun and has a computer with a Don't Tread on Me wallpaper and a D drive full of bondage porn.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

D, E, and F drives. Not RAIDed, of course. Being raided is for the illegals, according to him.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago

I double checked just for maximum hypocrisy but MO apparently isn't one of the permanent felon disenfranchisement states - so once time/probation is served convicted felons regain their voting rights.

That makes me throw up slightly less, I guess.

[–] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Damn it really is a cult.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

"party of law and order"

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Being right for all the wrong reasons.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Oh now that it's a rich white man they're going to get rid of the laws meant to disenfranchise black communities?

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The white supremacist theocratic autocracy which runs Missouri knows no bounds. The party which is constantly obsessed with "law and order" and gangs and crime can absolutely not see the hypocrisy.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I am not against it. If Trump can then the others should.

[–] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 6 points 2 weeks ago

Trump shouldn't.

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

and the backward sprint continues.

[–] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

What a legacy to leave behind /s

[–] ramsorge@discuss.online 2 points 2 weeks ago

So the way to prevent people from running for office is to find ANY felony to charge them with and keep them in court.

I’m all for kicking that ass to the curb, but this might not end how we might want it to

load more comments
view more: next ›