this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
665 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59441 readers
3911 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/4853884

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/4853256

To whom it may concern.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schwim@lemm.ee 40 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Ah, a change.org petition . I eagerly await the sweeping improvements to life abroad.

[–] FuryMaker@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Has any petition here ever actually lead to any change?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Not going to sign it, too. Change.org is part of the problem, and not of the solution.

[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Just a casual bystander with no clue what's going on... why's change.org a problem?

Edit: ok, read more posts, understand now

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I couldn't find any posts talking about it, what's wrong with it?

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago

It's like waving a disapproving finger at a brick wall, has always been my criticism.

Protests shouldn't be so easily tossed in a bin. If you aren't a problem, then no one has to listen to your message.

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

I don't like the idea of governments banning access to a website, unless its like CSAM.

[–] iii@mander.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

It's short sighted indeed.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

fuck CSAM, but where do we draw the line?

let laws regulate society and don't let government regulate directly.

for example, instead of banning access to X, outlaw the use of Social media in direct advertising. Make the EU market so hostile towards their business practices they can't legally operate.

then, it's "X" that refuses to operate within the laws we as a people have required, not just an over-reaching autocrat.

[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

That's a bad idea because of how reliant small businesses are on social media advertising. A regulation like that would essentially screw over every business that isn't rich enough to go to bigger advertising venues.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Twitter is not the sole, or even the biggest social media company in Europe. It's not even in the top 3.

The advertisement sector will be fine.

[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

That's what I'm trying to say. Losing Twitter isn't a big deal.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

yes... because businesses are more important than democracies....

you know, not that long ago these coverless books existed that came out every day. they had stories, news, even comics in them. and you know what? they even had advertisements in them!

social media is a convenience to business. government is not a social convenience.

[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Businesses are the ones that produce food, medicine, clothes, build houses, print books, provide gas and electricity, build roads, etc. There are businesses that have outlasted monarchies and democracies. I'm not a corpo schmuck but small businesses are the soul of the soul of our society.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

People ~~Businesses~~ are the ones that produce food, medicine, clothes, build houses, print books, provide gas and electricity, build roads, etc. There are businesses that have outlasted their usefulness ~~monarchies and democracies~~. I'm ~~not~~ a corpo schmuck ~~but~~ and culture is ~~small businesses are~~ the soul of the soul of our society.

there, I fixed it.

the purpose of any business is to be profitable, otherwise it's a charity. businesses have zero philanthropic goals.

people make a business profitable. People make the products and services. People consume the product.

no people, no business.

no government, no people, no business.

don't let greed cloud your judgement.

[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 0 points 55 minutes ago* (last edited 55 minutes ago)

Yes a business usually consists of people and is driven by profit, you sted the obvious, but what is your point?

Do people buy their vacuums from Dyson Ltd. or from a guy named Kevin?

It's not just about profits, it's about accountability. That's what the different forms of corporations represent. A singular private person can't and shouldn't be held accountable for every product the produce. A business is a layer of protection of limited (Ltd.) accountability. How could anybody be motivated to invent or produce anything if a single miss use of your product that causes any harm (intended or not) could lead to you directly being held responsible and possible going to jail. A business on the other hand usually has limited accountability but is also held to a much higher standard of quality and proof than a private individual ever could.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Business also managed just fine before social media advertising was a thing.

[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago

That's true.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 29 points 15 hours ago (6 children)

See it more like "preventing a website whose owner refuses to comply withEuropean law from operating in the EU".

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] maplebar@lemmy.world 32 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Corporate nationalist social media like "X" (American oligarchy) and TikTok (Chinese oligarchy) are a danger to the sovereignty and stability of the Western world.

[–] KreekyBonez@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

and the reddit Russian psy-op? certainly not helping

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 47 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Op, if you want to submit a petition to the EU, you should use their portal https://www.europarl.europa.eu/petitions/en/home not change.org

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 1 hour ago

Exactly. This is the only correct answer. Change.org petitions are as worthless as a 7 euros banknote.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 85 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Ah change.org the platform best known for not changing anything ever.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Yeah, but they're great at discharging the righteous indignation of people who might otherwise do something extreme like going on demonstrations or start campaigning for non-"moderate" political parties.

This way people just put their personal data next to a meaningless and powerless piece of text on a website alongside that of other people, get the feeling of release after having done something about what pisses them of, and won't do anything further about it.

Petitions are the single greatest invention of the Internet Age to keep the masses dormant (Social Media would've been it if, it wasn't that, as the far-right has shown, it can be used to turn some people into activists).

[–] Bruncvik@lemmy.world 87 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Everyone who signed the petition should close their Twitter accounts. And write their newspapers that they would cancel their subscriptions if the articles quoted or embedded tweets. I didn't sign any petition, and I'm already doing it. Well, sort of. I didn't have any Twitter account ro close.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Maybe not quote, but embed. They should still quote noteworthy things on there, but don't force us to interact with the site

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 38 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Let's at least block the government agencies from using it in favor of open platforms and protocols to communicate with its citizens.

At least give me some good ole RSS in the backend, and they could host their own Mastodon instances that people can subscribe to from other public instances.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 18 points 21 hours ago

Let's at least block the government agencies from using it in favor of open platforms and protocols to communicate with its citizens.

Yeah. When public services solely use Xitter or Facebook pisses me off. We can and should make that shit illegal.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Germany did this years ago. Their government hosts a mastodon instance for various agencies

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

Watch the next government go back on all of that.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 46 points 1 day ago (10 children)

As much as I dislike Musk, expansion of the great firewall of Europe seems like a bad idea.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 21 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

+1

They should discourage institutions from using it (and use government Mastadon instances of course). This is honestly long overdue.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

Yep they should keep fining him exponentially till he leaves (he obviously will never fall in line with EU rules)

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›