this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
1850 points (100.0% liked)

196

16412 readers
1698 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1850
Android rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by CosmicFlowchart@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 138 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Android's file structure is so incomprehensible. I'm genuinely surprised there hasn't been any significant effort made to make it more readable. Pictures saved in app directories, downloads, camera, images, pictures, media, DCIM???.

[–] Metallibus@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm genuinely surprised there hasn't been any significant effort made to make it more readable.

Quite the opposite. They've tried to make it better, and in turn, they've made it worse.

They used to have a pretty straightforward Linux file structure, and you were expected to put things in the external Pictures folder. And downloads went to the external Downloads folder. Back then, internal storage was small and SDs were large, so apps couldn't really afford to store these things locally and the SD structure was well enough defined that it was pretty clear where pictures would go.

Now, Google has pushed against SD cards. They also started requiring more permissions for external storage. They've added some "documents" APIs that were supposed to make it easier to tag/find files, but it's a tangled mess and most apps don't touch it. And they've rewritten their storage model multiple times at this point. If you're writing a new app, it's unclear which model to even follow anymore because Google has created a giant cluster fuck of options and paradigms.

Google is actively making this problem worse and worse. I wish they had never tried to "fix" this in the first place.

[–] outdated_belated@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

xkcd “standards” comes to mind

[–] MinusPi@pawb.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We don't even have to link the relevant xkcds anymore

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there was that joke where every joke is already known so instead of telling the joke they just say the number of it.

wonder if we ever get there, someone will just reply, xkcd 375

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yogurtwrong@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Open source developer and Linux enthusiast here. Although cluttered, Android's home directory is fairly simple to understand

The nightmare begins when you take a look at the root filesystem.

One time I was trying to port an OS to my phone and I had to figure out the Android init system. Went to source.android.com and what. the. fuck. Just as a side-by-side comparison:

Linux boot sequence: Android boot sequence (unmodded, SIMPLE):

There are so many wrong things about it like why are there 11, 12 places to put programs (/system/bin, /bin, /usr/bin /system/usr/bin, /sbin, /system/usr/share/bin...)

Why the fuck drivers are scattered around folders instead of just /lib/modules

Why is the home directory /storage/emulated/0/ instead of just /home/0/ (also why the user is named "0")

Where the fuck is everything???

God (Linus Torvalds) forgive me but even Windows is better than that shit

[–] ShittyKopper@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i wonder if that graphic is up to date with system as root and A/B dynamic partitioning and whatever crazy new bullshit google invents with every release

[–] IverCoder@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I raise you all of these monstrosities:

  • Phones launching with Android 13 without a dedicated partition for recovery mode

Phones launching with Android 13 without a dedicated partition for recovery mode

  • Phones launching with Android 13 with two dedicated partitions for recovery mode (two because of A/B partitioning scheme)

Phones launching with Android 13 with a two dedicated partitions for recovery mode

  • Phones launching with Android 13 with one dedicated partition for recovery mode (only one because A/B partitioning scheme is not used)

Phones launching with Android 13 with one dedicated partition for recovery mode

  • Phones that launch with or upgrade to Android 12, that use a generic kernel image, without a dedicated partition for recovery mode

Phones that launch with or upgrade to Android 12, that use a generic kernel image, without a dedicated partition for recovery mode

  • Phones that launch with or upgrade to Android 12, that use a generic kernel image, with two dedicated partitions for recovery mode (A/B partitioning scheme)

Phones that launch with or upgrade to Android 12, that use a generic kernel image, with two dedicated partitions for recovery mode

  • Phones that launch with or upgrade to Android 12, that use a generic kernel image, with one dedicated partition for recovery mode (non-A/B partitioning scheme)

Phones that launch with or upgrade to Android 12, that use a generic kernel image, with one dedicated partition for recovery mode

  • Phones that upgrade to Android 12, that does not use a generic kernel image, with no dedicated partition for recovery mode

Phones that launch with or upgrade to Android 12, that does not use a generic kernel image, with no dedicated partition for recovery mode

  • Phones that upgrade to Android 12, that does not use a generic kernel image, with dedicated partition(s) for recovery mode

Phones that upgrade to Android 12, that does not use a generic kernel image, with dedicated partition(s) for recovery mode

In Android's defense however, a phone would likely use only one of these layouts at a time. The question of which of these layouts does a said phone uses though, that's a more complicated question.

That's not correct though. The GNU+Linux version is missing the bootloader and initramfs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 year ago

Tbh it doesn't really matter since your gallery shows all of them in one place.

That is until you want to transfer your pictures to a pc...

I feel like if anything they made effort to not have people touch the file manager ever

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 93 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Android's file structure is bad, yes. But does iOS even have a file structure? In my very limited time using iOS, I couldn't find anything resembling a file explorer.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

we had a ducking sane file structure on symbian. Before apple knew what smartphone means. We had sane file structure on siemens phones.

There's no excuse for the unholy abomination of what manufacturers call an "operating system" on a smartphone these days.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Peak symbian was the sony ericsson p1i.

Had a gf throw that thing against a cinder block wall, off a concrete floor, and basically explode everywhere. i picked upthe parts, snapped it back together, turned it back on and left.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hellishharlot@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It does have a files app now and it's so good compared to Android file apps right now

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

android has no official "files" app though?
google files is a technically a 3rd party app and the AOSP files app is usually hidden and used only as a file picker.

[–] claymore@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago

the AOSP file picker is so ass, everytime I get a new android i have to install Mixplorer (not affiliated with the Xiaomi brand) just to have a sane experience picking my files

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BoldRaven@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There isn't an equivalent on iOS

[–] 5redie8@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

iOS has had a file explorer for years at this point

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] deikoepfiges_dreirad@lemmy.zip 85 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Files are soo outdated. The user should not have to worry about "Files". What even is a " Directory"? Your nudes are on some guys computer in california but the world is in your hand. there is an app for everything, just use the apps, go with the flow, look at lots of ads, buy a tesla, tell your dirty secrets to google bard — everything is intuitive...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Capricorny90210@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Download completed..

Files>downloads>empty 😔

[–] SixTrickyBiscuits@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

Ah see, the problem is you were looking in /sdcard0/ which of course, refers to your internal storage and not your SD card which is probably called /0xgg0gdjdsjgg/ or something.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

z/common/Facebook/dlot/downloads/pics/angry birds/pics/common/ahshhysyyagg.png

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

and where exactly is it saved?

On your phone, silly.

[–] Coach@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah...I don't have any issues with file management on Android. There's a folder structure and that's all I really need. 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

My problem with it is how inconsistently things get placed.

App downloaded an image: it could be in the apps main data folder, DCIM, Pictures, Documents, or even a new folder at the base of the tree. Add an sd card and that list doubles as all those same locations exist separately on the sd card as well. (I've had images land in all 10 of these locations before)

/edit missed the 'download' folder. 12 possible locations.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] torafugu@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also applies to the Snap version of Firefox.

[–] jannis@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

Found the Ubuntu user

[–] randint@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

not quite pertinent but you can have a gif as your avatar?

[–] torafugu@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

No, I just bend space time to make it appear as if my avatar is spinning. (In all seriousness, yes if you use Kbin)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redhydride@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And you can't rename it and search for it afterwords. It makes that much frustrating to find

[–] ArchTemperedKoala@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not sure if it's a Samsung thing, but I can easily rename and search the files...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] astral_avocado@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Please someone tell me why androids filesystem structure is so damn confusing, I've wondered this forever but have never looked it up

[–] heimchen@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have spent weeks setting up LineageOs for my unsupported phone and I think I understood it.

  • So /storage/emulated/0 is practically your home directory, all folders you can easily change are there.
  • I don’t understand these memes, everything gets saved to /Downloads. The default file explorer is just crap. I use amaze
  • the only really weird directory is the camera, it is saved in DCIM
  • If you care about app specific app data go to /Android/data (for me its like the .config directory)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] biddy@feddit.nl 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IOS is worse. You can't even be sure that it's saved, let alone where.

[–] odbol@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

And if you can save it to Files, only like two apps can open it and it's random which ones

[–] SamXavia@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Still can't find 90% of the images i've downloaded, probably will factory reset my phone and them to still take up space.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JoJoGAH@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Some forced Google bloat ware snatched it and ran

[–] Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev 14 points 1 year ago

It seems a lot of people are having issues with this, I've never experienced a problem though

My files app always shows it in my recents view so idk

[–] EditsHisComments@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[–] SamsungAppleOnePlus@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Credit where it’s due, iOS / iPadOS’s Files app is really good. I use both iOS and Android on the daily and I prefer working with files on my Apple devices.

[–] ArchTemperedKoala@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As someone used to windows and android, I can't find anything on an iPad lol

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gazumbo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Oh My God.

This needs fixing. It's infuriating at times

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel the same way about the macbook I am forced to use by work. I just want my windows back

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Finder…finds things. Just sayin

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

iOS stores it in “downloads”

Oh right, Apple bad!

[–] luna@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The iOS Files app only lets you access a tiny part of the OS so you don't accidentally install a non-Apple approved app or god forbid, modify something on a device you own 🥴

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›