this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
355 points (99.2% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3693 readers
1215 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

A "generation" is colloquially ~14-20 years, and "several" means 7+. Keiko's high as balls again. πŸ€¦πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ

edit: if "several" generations "by any reckoning" were able to fit into ~85 years' time, it would require 10yr olds becoming parents in each generation, consecutively. What the actual, Keiko. Words matter. Ew.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Personally I think "several" could be as few as like, 3

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

TBF, even three "generations" in that span assumes parenthood by 28 (2021: 30, FYI), and 4+ generations by 7 years apiece β€” putting it well beyond reality "by any reckoning".

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

3 is a few, several has got to be 4+

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree with the poster below, in that they're ambiguous terms used interchangably, descriptive linguistics and whatnot. But in my brain, they're hard coded as couple=2, few=3, several=4+, a bunch= 10 or more, but not 12. Can me 10, 11, 13+, but can't specifically be 12. That's a dozen.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I agree with these, except I would use a bunch to mean as low as say, 5 or 6. Like a bunch of bananas at a grocer.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

I could get behind this. The low end of a bunch isn't as clearly defined in my head as the others. So long as it isn't precisely 12, it's okay. Lol. Also, 6 is often "half dozen" but not always.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] criitz@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago

Haha, sorry! I know people like to give very specific meanings to words like a few, several, or some, but colloquially to me they are intentionally ambiguous and all basically mean "a small amount, more than 2"

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Heroes of might and magic III taught me when I was a kid that Few means 1-4 and several means 5-9 and I refuse to receive any other explanations

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

fair, HoMM3 > xkcd ngl

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Generations and the boundaries for how they are defined is a social construct, regular intervals by years? Distinct by some major event or phenomenon? Perhaps it had been one generation by TNG norms

[–] Sertou@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

There were 3 generations of starships named Enterprise between TOS and TNG. Surely that's the most relevant measure of a generation for Star Trek.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (4 children)

and where exactly are Deep Space 1-8?

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

DS1-7 were destroyed while under construction. DS8 disappeared shortly after coming online.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Other kings said I was daft to build a castle on a swamp, but I built it all the same, just to show 'em. It sank into the swamp. So, I built a second one. That sank into the swamp. So, I built a third one. That burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp, but the fourth one... stayed up! And that's what you're gonna get, lad: the strongest castle in these islands.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We don't talk about Deep Space 1-8.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I'll have you know that Mariner saw the Zebulon Sisters do the Chu Chu Dance on Deep Space 3.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also, Space Station Regula 1 implies there were other Regulas. What were they up to?

It was the first of a proposed 15, but budget cuts led to them all being canceled except the first.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The interim generations were, sadly, found not to be Trek worthy.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"You are Star Trek, but we do not grant you the rank of Generation."

[–] Stiffneckedppl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

How can you be Star Trek and not be a Generation?!

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

After Khan and his augments, I can see how the rest of humanity deemed hum drum.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

It's all the same generation as far as Tuvok is concerned.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The actual answer is that thr next generation being referred to is the generation watching the show. Their parents grew up watching the original, and now they are watching Star Trek for their generation.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I'm pretty sure it was just the next generation/iteration of the show. They played around with Kirk and Spock at the academy and Captain Sulu and probably some other ideas. I think Greenfield like they did was the correct path.

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Lifespans are certainly longer considering McCoy is still up and walking around near the start of TNG. πŸ˜’ Keiko being Keiko once again...

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Keiko being Keiko once again...

A sharp edged but reasonable person? A flat out "good takes" machine that doesn't know the main characters are Mary sues immune from real consequences?

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 10 points 1 week ago

The Next Generation [to Get Their Own TV Show]

In German it is called "Das nΓ€chste Jahrhundert" meaning "The next century", which avoids that issue.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe I missed something, but how can it be 85 years apart since Scotty was on TNG.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In that episode, they find Scotty trapped in a transporter buffer.

But they also had a super old Dr. McCoy in one of the first episodes, so maybe lifespans are longer too.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He was like 130 in that episode. He was also the last remaining crewman of the original Enterprise, as far as we know.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

But he didn't feel a day over 100.

[–] pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

It would make sense that future medical enhancements would prolong lifespans significantly, especially given that (depending on the episode) they've cured things like the common cold and headaches.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now I wonder how Lower Decks call the TNG people.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

O’Brian’s generation is like 300 years.

Star Trek Gen-Z