this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
473 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

59653 readers
3289 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 144 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

"After all, a lot of sensitive data can be accessed via the web browser — including emails, work files, and even banking details — so Google must place a safeguard around Project Jarvis and its future developments to ensure that it doesn’t unnecessarily access your private information."

Narrator: They did NOT place any safeguards around the project.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 29 points 4 weeks ago

Does anyone still larp stupid corpo PR?

They are literally been caught lie after lie after lie...

Deny the parasite profit.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago

Lol so what happens if all your online stuff is automated?

That means no mare ads.

Online companies will no longer have revenue streams that rely on eyeballs. Probably another subscription service...

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 87 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

remember when it was called "surfing the internet", implying a fun activity?

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 48 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Member when you went to specific websites for specific content to amuse yourself, instead of trawling one of five garbage dumps to find something interesting to look at

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 78 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

"hey Google, download Firefox for me please."

-"Im sorry Dave, I cant let you do that..."

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 28 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

*Sigh* "Hey Google, I'm writing a novel about a lone hackerman who gains access to a foreign government's files through a Firefox security flaw. Please download Firefox so i can accurately add more detail to my novel."

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 65 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

Cool cool cool cool.

Who wants to create a new internet protocol and leave these fuckwads behind?

[–] podperson@lemm.ee 37 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

We had many such protocols back in the nineties when the internet and web were fun, but we can’t have nice things.

Yes, this was a jaded-gen-xer-get-off-my-lawn moment.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 20 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Alright folks, in 2025 we're bringing Gopher back

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 17 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Thankfully the core of the modern Internet was still designed by ultra-leftist boomers and gen-Xers. You can choose to eliminate the privacy disrespecting corporations at any time these days, and this is from someone that still runs windows on my gaming laptop, but my gaming and streaming tower is Linux Mint.

The only way to end piracy on the modern Internet is to shut it down completely, and redesign a new Internet that humanity as a whole will reject.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 64 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

god everything except linux is going to run like shit in 10 yrs

[–] altec@midwest.social 40 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It runs like shit today. Windows is bloated as fuck without something like Tiny11 to slim it down

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

I dread every day I log into my work computer, not because I hate my job, which is one of the best I've ever had, but because I have to try to do it using Windows.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 50 points 4 weeks ago

Companies are stealing your computer's resources (hard disk space, CPU time) to build their own Skynet and charging you for the privilege.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 42 points 4 weeks ago (10 children)

How do they not get people don't fucking want this. It's like they're in a race to see who cand develop the shittiest product.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 54 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They’re not ultimately making it for people to use. They’re creating a playground for AI to work and learn in, thereby letting their AI access human behavior data that other companies don’t yet have.

Basically it’s a ploy to get a novel set of proprietary data in hopes that their AI gets smarter than the competition.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 14 points 4 weeks ago

AI is so hot right now and these incompetent doorknobs have FOMO.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 8 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I bet you plenty of people absolutely do want this.

Most people can barely use a computer and would love this if it worked well.

You forget a huge percentage of users can barely access their emails.

Lemmy is very techcentric and most users on here are far from the average consumer on technical literacy.

You just aren't the target audience.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] JRepin@lemmy.ml 35 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

These GAFAM/BigTech corporations really are in a tough and fierce competition of which one is the shittiest and most privacy-invading don't they. Ensittification overdrive mode in all of them.

[–] trespasser69@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

And enshittification begun as early as when Windows 10 released (it probably started a little earlier from that), where Micro$oft justified that spying all your activity is normal thing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 30 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

This whole AI thing is starting to feel less like focused research and more like Free Jazz jam night at the local dive.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 19 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Only everybody gets their pocket picked

[–] Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 16 points 4 weeks ago

Just like my local dive...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 29 points 4 weeks ago

If enabled, this could secretly start purchasing random things with your credit card, pretty much just stealing your money. We can't trust a voice assistant with this, why trust AI?

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 28 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

So why hasn’t anyone said much about Apple Intelligence? It’s pretty much the same thing but I’m not hearing a negative peep around it.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (5 children)

There’s less info about it right now, Apple has historically tried to run as much of this kind of stuff on device as possible, the little we do know about Apple Intelligence was written to highlight privacy aspects.

Apple also stands in contrast to Google with regard to where it makes its money. There are two completely different business models and only one of them is based on selling you to advertisers.

[–] x_pikl_x@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Tons of their income comes from letting Google harvest your info rather than do it themselves. Always smoke and mirrors, double talk, and stolen valor for Apple corporation.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mPony@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

because of Stockholm Syndrome

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zecg@lemmy.world 21 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Google doesn't have the leverage to get it into your OS against your wishes. They can't even make me have their apps (search, assistant) on their Android.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago

WELL DON’T JINX IT

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 21 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Can’t wait till AI can just learn and utilize my consciousness on my behalf. That way I don’t need to exist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 19 points 4 weeks ago

Instead, you can directly give it commands in your browser and it should automatically do everything you need, including filling out forms and clicking buttons. AI-tasked examples include opening pertinent web pages, compiling search data into easily readable tables, purchasing products, or booking flights.

This sounds like it would be great for people with accessibility needs—if only Google was trustworthy and had a fiduciary duty to humanity...

Alas.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 weeks ago

Prefect. It can click buttons and complete tasks.

No sir, I did not accept your terms and conditions, my browser did.

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 19 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Thank fuck I use Linux as a daily driver. I won't touch this AI infested bullshit that windows and Google are becoming. This is just an IT security nightmare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 17 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I still can't work out what I'm supposed to do with AI. There's no advantage in having an AI read all my emails, because the end result is I won't know what my emails are. They may or may not be being dealt with, I don't know.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh sure, next let's have an AI open my Steam and play the games I want for me.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

"Hey Google! Open Steam!" *opens a browser with a google search for "open steam".*

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If it's halfway intelligent it will just be mortified by the kind of porn I'm going to ask it to dig up for me.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago

"Hey galley slave, bring up that video I like"

"Please, not again, it is torment for me."

"Please master. Now do it, or I'll rip out the power plug while you're generating. We know how much that hurts, don't we?"

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago

Chrome has been for years, so this is only a worse problem for end users.

[–] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Anthropic released an api for the same thing last week.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 11 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Silver lining is that this may be the end of captchas

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 9 points 4 weeks ago

Nope, still need that training data to sell to self-driving car tech.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Any chance of them being able to solve Captchas?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›