this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
220 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19138 readers
2968 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The real former student, a man who attended a school where Walz taught, told The Post that they never met. He said he was dismayed to see the video showing someone using his name to make the claims.

Matthew Metro didn’t recognize the face that popped up on his cellphone screen when he clicked a link that a friend texted him last week. But after hitting play on the online video, he was dismayed by what he saw.

“My name is Matthew Metro,” said the man in the video, who went on to describe life as a student decades ago at a high school in Minnesota where Democratic vice-presidential nominee Tim Walz was a teacher. Some of the details — including about being at the school when Walz worked there — matched the biography of the real Metro. But the man in the video went further, leveling fabricated allegations against Walz, whom the real Metro said he never met.

Millions of people have viewed social media posts containing the video since it was published Wednesday on X, formerly Twitter. For some viewers, the use of Metro’s name and verifiable biographical details created an aura of credibility around the false allegations. Not so for the real Metro, whom The Washington Post located in Hilo, Hawaii.

Non-paywall link

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 82 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So everything on twitter is a lie and a misinformation campaign. Got it.

[–] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

Elon Musk is the Henry Ford of our day, and Twitter is his Dearborn Independent.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Elon Musk ought to be held personally liable for defaming Matthew Metro and Tim Walz.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago

Only if he can be tied to it. Otherwise, the same section 230 protections cover him as anyone else who creates a digital platform others can use.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Always has been.

[–] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is this not somehow illegal and could whoever created that fake story not be held accountable?

[–] _bcron_@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't know about this specifically but I've read that a lot of this Walz allegation stuff is being traced to Russia. In general a lot of Harris Walz misinformation/deepfakes are allegedly coming from Russia.

Wired has a paywalled article but if you google 'Walz allegations fake Russia' you'll get quite a few hits.

But if that's the case, like 'quasi-professional' propaganda firms, they probably use cracked wifi, VPNs, coffee shops, probably hard to find them at a physical location, let alone Russia allowing extradition. They'd want some fair trade at a minimum

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Coming from Russia, boosted by Musk

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

Of course it is. But the damage has been done and by the time that charges can be filed, it will be well after the election.

Also, our justice department seems to have some sort of blinders for alt right conservatives.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes. If the person is not located in the US or a country that would extradite, that gets significantly less likely and possible though.

[–] FatLegTed@piefed.social 20 points 1 month ago

Like Russia, North Korea, Iran or China? In that case we need to hold accountable the head of the company promoting these sort of posts. Musk.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's insane to me is that someone clearly looked for a list of people to find a REAL name, but didn't bother checking if the owner of that name was still alive and able to say "hey that isn't me, they're lying about being me"

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago

Viral disinformation still works even when proven to be false.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This isn't fair to him. This is the sort of terrorism I was afraid of.

Fuck the GOP. Fuck Russia. If this convinces one person, it's too many.

I don't know how, but we need to destroy racism once and for all. Make it mandatory education on what they do. Make it mandatory education on how it destroys a country. Make it mandatory education how fascism is deadly to even the in group.

But first, Dems need to stack the Supreme Court. I've said it since I learned in highschool that FDR did it to save the goddamn country. Remove the filibuster. End FPTP. End the representative cap. If the Senate serves some important legislative function, keep them, but remove their voting power. Or also have the Senate divided up by population.

Write an amendment reversing Citizens United.

Then, maybe, we have a chance at continuing the great experiment.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Racists are vermin. They should be trapped and composted with the rest.

Brilliant! I agree.

I think the first step is Harris getting elected and Dems retaking the Senate in 2026. Then go with the 127 DC states plan - https://www.vox.com/2020/1/14/21063591/modest-proposal-to-save-american-democracy-pack-the-union-harvard-law-review - this gives the required two thirds majority to pass any required constitutional amendments to implement the above.