this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
98 points (93.0% liked)

World News

38977 readers
3492 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The top U.S. official working on the humanitarian situation in Gaza told aid groups in August that the U.S. would not consider withholding weapons from Israel for blocking food and medicine from entering the enclave — a rare admission by someone in the administration.

At the Aug. 29 meeting in Washington, Lise Grande told the leaders of more than a dozen aid organizations that the U.S. could potentially consider other tactics to convince Israel to allow life-saving aid into Gaza — such as applying pressure through the United Nations, but stressed that the administration would continue to support Israel and would not delay or stop weapons shipments.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Open wide, America, Bibi's balls are getting dry and your taxpayer dollars are the saliva that will moisturize them

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

"What would you do different than Joe Biden?" Kamala, "there's not a thing that comes to mind."

"How do you plan on solving the situation in the Middle East?" Kamala, "Israel has a right to defend itself. We will always have their back."

"What do think about Dick Cheney endorsing you?" Kamala, "I'm honored to have the endorsement of Dick Cheney. He's a well respected leader."

[–] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

We get the sweat off of netenyahus balls, and Biden/Harris/Trump gets paid for it, and we get.. nothing? I dont like this arrangement, but I guess we have to vote for Harris or Trump and have no choices?

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You could work to dismantle the system. Heck, if people had joined the uncommitted movement instead of attacking it for their establishment overlords, the Democratic party could have been pushed to offer a candidate against genocide and for genuine social policies.

But people let themselves get gaslighted and happily rallied around their party leaders, despite getting fucked by them.

[–] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I'm with you-- thats currently my plan, voting uncommitted in the general unless Harris stops the weapons before election day. Its about the smallest thing I could ask for and still ask for anything at all. I fear that all future US elections will all be manipulated to follow this pattern and itll be tough to break out of.

[–] femtech@midwest.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean I'm not getting fucked by Harris but I would be killed by trump. Once Harris is in im still going to be pushing the US to tell Israel to fuck off.

[–] dank@lemmy.today -2 points 2 weeks ago

And Harris will laugh.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Man, there's gotta be something more to this.

Remember all that fuss about how a retired general said that the U.S. and other governments have crashed alien ships they've been studying? Does isreal have, like, the least damaged ships or something? Like, wtf does isreal possibly have that the U.S. is so beholden to it? It just can't be that isreal "is a historically important religious site," because that's just stupid. We don't spend Billions of dollars a year to maintain the fucking Vatican, and we certainly wouldn't while it's actively engaging in genocide and aparthied. So why are we doing it for isreal?

Gotta be aliens.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

They give the US a military presence in a strategic location.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

These dummys can't distinguish between an ally and a hijacker.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Can we get like a list on the countries that are so close allies that they're able to commit genocide at will? Like I'm curious who makes the cut. Like you got to think France and the UK, Germany? Do the krauts get to burn children alive? Japan?

but stressed that the administration would continue to support Israel and would not delay or stop weapons shipments.

Hoping that this is one area that Harris/Walz will distinguish from Biden's admin in.