Cmon murica, the rest of the world combined is now spending more than just the US. How could this happen?
this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
143 points (98.6% liked)
Data Is Beautiful
6841 readers
2 users here now
A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz
(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
what is sad, is that for 10 perfect year between 1990 and 2000 we could believe that humanity was on its way to world peace..now we're back to total annihilation program
A specific event in 2001 first triggered the growth, then a couple of jackass presidents made it worse.
Netenyahu, Putin, Biden and Modi should be in chains in the darkest deepest prison cell humanity can create.
biden isn't really on that list. essentially it should be a rotating slot for whoever is elected US president
How do you figure he's not on the list?
Exactly the years that OG Millennials went from small children to adults, and then off to college to saddle ourselves with debt for a future that would never exist. Yay
After the end of the Cold War, there's a clear trend in US spending where it ratchets down every year during Democratic administrations and up again during Republican administrations. The only exceptions are the first two years of the Obama admin, after he inherited Bush's wars, and 2023, after Russia invaded Ukraine
pretty clear what nation represents the greatest threat to humanity
North Korea?
Obligator y/s
Ugh, that Reagan bump
Can we get this adjusted by CPI?
I agree in spirit but a CPI applied to military expenditure would be adjusting for prices of irrelevant items and could become very skewed at such large scales
Admittedly I don't know have a better idea either so... Guess I'm hoping somebody smarter than me can chime in
Yeah, what this graph mostly tells you is that things cost more in the US.
that dip between 1990 and 2000 is the specific reason the 90s were good
I don't understand how to read this graph.
Each column represents the total military spend of the world's countries in that year. Each column is further broken into what separate parts spent that year, the categories for those parts being America, Russia/USSR, China, NATO except America, and the rest of the world.
So to pick some examples out, we can see Soviet expenditure (the bright red section of each column) crash enormously when the country fell apart in 1991. Post-Soviet Russia hardly spent anything by comparison, so the red section of each column got really small all of a sudden. This combined with the reduction in American expenditure (the pale blue section) in the 90s resulted in a low total spend for the world (the total height of each stack), even though the spending of every other country outside of those two stayed fairly constant (the pink for China, dark blue for non-USA NATO, and grey for everyone else).
It's a terrible format because jumps in lower categories make higher categories appear to jump, but they've actually just been pushed upward.
Ok I’m actually shocked that the sino-Soviet split and Chinese development of thermonuclear weapons doesn’t show up on china’s portion of this graph
So depressing...
So... tensions now are higher than they've ever been, even at the height of the cold war? Is that a fair assessment on the situation?