this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
341 points (98.6% liked)

World News

38968 readers
3492 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Ukrainian journalist who was captured by Moscow while reporting from occupied east Ukraine has died in Russian detention, according to Ukrainian officials.

Victoria Roshchyna, who would have turned 28 this month, disappeared in August last year after travelling to Russian-held east Ukraine for a report.

She remained missing until April 2024, when her father received a letter from Moscow’s defence ministry saying she was being held in Russian detention, according to Ukraine’s main journalist union.

The circumstances of her arrest were not made public and it was not clear where she was being held inside Russia.

MBFC
Archive

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Sad. Reminds me of an Explosions in the Sky album name I have always loved; Those Who Tell the Truth Shall Die, Those Who Tell the Truth Shall Live Forever

RIP, Victoria

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Fucking animals!

[–] quant@leminal.space 4 points 3 weeks ago

A tragedy for the family and the colleagues. On the other hand, Putin's cronies were killing their own journalists digging up dirts around the Chechen wars. Nothing to be surprised from those gangsters who took over a gas station.

[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

The people who consistently downvote the mediabiasfactcheck bot should be banned. Unless they come up with one that is better, quit trying to censor it.

If you were to look at the mod logs it’s the same 7 people, repeatedly. That’s brigading.

It’s telling when only posts which are from right wing sites are not downvoted by the brigade.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

If they banned everyone that hates that stupid fucking bot then there'd be no one left.

[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] Krzd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If my mechanic sets my car on fire I don't have to be a mechanic to know that that's a shitty thing to do.
Why would I have to program a better bot just to criticise the (shitty) existing one?

[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Because it’s a feature now, just like the post you chose to come to. These people who constantly brigade need to start their own instance if they don’t like it.

Or just block it. Take it to another mechanic

Criticize then block or move on

I never use it, but whoever is brigading is trying to censor the comment section. I think we have enough of that already.

[–] Krzd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

So instead of calling out your mechanic you'd just let them burn your car and say nothing?
Also, it's not brigading as there hasn't been (AFAIK) anyone asking other people to downvote.
Right now you're defending the car mechanic because other people complain about him burning down cars??

Edit: So your advice is, run away and never (try to) change anything bad that you see in the world?

[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As I stated before, Make your criticism then move on and/or block. Don’t try and censor the comment section.

[–] Krzd@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Who's censoring anything??

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is there a better way to get a quick background check of a news organization?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

MB/FC is worse than random, so rolling dice would be better. MB/FC & Poynter reliably favor imperial core corporate, NGO, and state-affiliated media.

I don’t know a shortcut to media literacy. Inventing Reality or Manufacturing Consent are good starting places.

[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So are expecting a trustworthy news outlet to pop up in some third world country ?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I expect trustworthy news to be hard to come by, because the capitalist class—which runs these countries[1][2], owns the media, and funds the NGOs—doesn’t want us to have it. They want us to have media biased in the service of themselves, the capitalist class of imperial core states where we happen to live. Huxley was right.[1]

Once upon a time, when union membership was much larger in the US, the labor movement had media of its own. Unions published their own papers. That’s something we need to get back.

[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Lemmy would be empty by your standards. Documentation of an event shouldn’t be hard to come by. It’s your perspective of the event that matters

If it looks like shit and smells like shit, it’s probably shit.

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I actually agree. I've never heard a reasonable explanation for the downvotes.

[–] Krzd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Because the information of the bot isn't trustworthy. It highly prefers colonial and right wing media.
Dunno which one it was exactly but IIRC the guardian got a "likely factual" or something rating because a few years back they did a mistake and corrected it a few weeks later. While other right wing media get the same rating despite posting straight up invented articles and facts without corrections.