World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
The people who consistently downvote the mediabiasfactcheck bot should be banned. Unless they come up with one that is better, quit trying to censor it.
If you were to look at the mod logs it’s the same 7 people, repeatedly. That’s brigading.
It’s telling when only posts which are from right wing sites are not downvoted by the brigade.
If they banned everyone that hates that stupid fucking bot then there'd be no one left.
Do you have a better one?
If my mechanic sets my car on fire I don't have to be a mechanic to know that that's a shitty thing to do.
Why would I have to program a better bot just to criticise the (shitty) existing one?
Because it’s a feature now, just like the post you chose to come to. These people who constantly brigade need to start their own instance if they don’t like it.
Or just block it. Take it to another mechanic
Criticize then block or move on
I never use it, but whoever is brigading is trying to censor the comment section. I think we have enough of that already.
So instead of calling out your mechanic you'd just let them burn your car and say nothing?
Also, it's not brigading as there hasn't been (AFAIK) anyone asking other people to downvote.
Right now you're defending the car mechanic because other people complain about him burning down cars??
Edit: So your advice is, run away and never (try to) change anything bad that you see in the world?
As I stated before, Make your criticism then move on and/or block. Don’t try and censor the comment section.
Who's censoring anything??
I just block the bot, because MB/FC is garbage.
Is there a better way to get a quick background check of a news organization?
MB/FC is worse than random, so rolling dice would be better. MB/FC & Poynter reliably favor imperial core corporate, NGO, and state-affiliated media.
I don’t know a shortcut to media literacy. Inventing Reality or Manufacturing Consent are good starting places.
So are expecting a trustworthy news outlet to pop up in some third world country ?
I expect trustworthy news to be hard to come by, because the capitalist class—which runs these countries[1][2], owns the media, and funds the NGOs—doesn’t want us to have it. They want us to have media biased in the service of themselves, the capitalist class of imperial core states where we happen to live. Huxley was right.[1]
Once upon a time, when union membership was much larger in the US, the labor movement had media of its own. Unions published their own papers. That’s something we need to get back.
Lemmy would be empty by your standards. Documentation of an event shouldn’t be hard to come by. It’s your perspective of the event that matters
If it looks like shit and smells like shit, it’s probably shit.
I actually agree. I've never heard a reasonable explanation for the downvotes.
Because the information of the bot isn't trustworthy. It highly prefers colonial and right wing media.
Dunno which one it was exactly but IIRC the guardian got a "likely factual" or something rating because a few years back they did a mistake and corrected it a few weeks later. While other right wing media get the same rating despite posting straight up invented articles and facts without corrections.