this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
266 points (82.4% liked)

Science Memes

10542 readers
3501 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 154 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

As long as we ignore the parallel sides requirement, sure.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 23 hours ago

Polar coordinate square?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 93 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

And that the 90 degree angles should be interior angles.

[–] ninja@lemmy.world 46 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

And that polygons should only consist of straight lines.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 32 points 20 hours ago

Yes sure, in Euclidean geometry, but this is clearly keyhole shaped geometry.

[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They're also not actually right angles, as the curvature starts departing from the angles origin. They may be approximately 90, down to many many small decimal places, but they are not 90.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

That's not accurate. If you are measuring the angle of a line intersecting with a curved surface, you measure against the tangent at the point of contact/intersection. It can be and still is exactly 90 degrees.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 31 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Take shitposts seriously and point out their obvious errors

-Carl Friedrich Gauss, probably

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 10 hours ago

The name of that Gauss?

Ampere

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 21 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Science memes is not r/shitposting? I would assume the person is serious when posting here.

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

gasp!!! it is c/!!!

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 20 points 19 hours ago

c/gatekeeping squares

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 10 points 23 hours ago

You're no fun

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 27 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I remember enough from geometry to know this is horseshit and be annoyed at it but not enough to actually prove why

[–] Tja@programming.dev 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sides must be straight and parallel two and two.

[–] Doll_Tow_Jet-ski@fedia.io 11 points 23 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 14 points 22 hours ago

The black lines

[–] UrLogicFails@beehaw.org 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Someone may want to double-check my math on this one, but the length of the sides will be dependant on the radius of the smaller circle

ϴ=π+1-√(π^2+1), l=(2π-ϴ)r_1, l is the length of the sides. r_1 is the radius of the smaller circle

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I look at your diagram and see:

ϴ= L/(L+R)

And

2π-ϴ = L/R

I solved those and got

L= π-1 ± √(1+π²) ~= 5.44 or -1.16

Whether or not a negative length is meaningful in this context is an exercise left to the reader

Giving (for L=5.44):

ϴ~= 0.845 ~~48.4° 

I'm surprised that it solved to a single number, maybe I made a mistake.

[–] UrLogicFails@beehaw.org 2 points 12 hours ago

That lines up pretty similarly with what I found also. The angle should be a constant since there is only one angle where the relationship would be true. I just left it in terms of π because I try to avoid rounding.

Having said that, L would be a ratio of r; which I think lines up with what you found as well.

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The semi-circle is one side, then the 2 straight edges, and the arc between them is the 4th side.

[–] Doll_Tow_Jet-ski@fedia.io 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's what I thought. The only way on which this has four sides is if the semi -circle is a side. But if that's the case, then I don't know wha the definition of "side" is

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Knock knock. Do you have a moment to discuss non-euclidean geometry?

[–] Doll_Tow_Jet-ski@fedia.io 8 points 19 hours ago

/slams door

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

it’s homeomorphic to a square, so why not

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 hours ago

See, you get it