this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
114 points (85.2% liked)

Privacy

31482 readers
694 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 72 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's how encrypted messagers work. Anyone can use then for any purpose. It is actually very reassuring that it has become so popular. Just to be clear I am not endorsing Neo Nazis.

Also I like how Simplex Chat doesn't have user facing identifiers. (People can't DM you)

The only concern I have is the public group chats but because I don't use that feature it isn't a big deal for me personally.

[–] Melody@lemmy.one 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

(People can’t DM you)

This is false. However, you must generate an "identifier / group / channel" for them and share that link out-of-band to them." Basically it means nobody can slide into your DMs unless you yourself consent to it and forge a connection with them to do so. It does offer a way to invite other users to chat; but the other user must consent as well...which makes it far safer usually.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

In other words, it's the same effect as when you make separate identities to share with different contacts on any messaging service. SimpleX has adopted that as the normal way to operate.

[–] Melody@lemmy.one 2 points 1 day ago

They certainly make it easier to do so; by making it a switch you can toggle; which allows you to generate an identity; or choose not to and roll with the identity they've already seen.

[–] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I have also seen Telegram groups dedicated to drug trade migrating to other platforms such as Signal.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago

Yeah all my human trafficking homies moved elsewhere /s

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And here I am over here just using telegram for it's easy to build bots and talking to my family. The bots are handy for many things.

[–] jared@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I haven't looked into the bots in years, what are you doing with them?

[–] m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Not a seasoned programmer myself but I did one (with Telethon and Python) to remind everyone in my family about incoming medical appointments for my parents, due dates for public services and calculating how much everyone must pay or due dates for going for their medications

[–] mintdaniel42@futurology.today -5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Interesting how you personally have seen groups dedicated to drug trade migrate to signal 🤔

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 23 points 1 day ago

Are drug users not allowed to use lemmy

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are you implying there's something wrong with that?

[–] mintdaniel42@futurology.today 0 points 17 hours ago

No no just curious

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 25 points 1 day ago

It is weird that this is how we keep track of the police

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 152 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Blaming a privacy respecting app for a minority group is lame af. That's how we lose all personal freedoms.

Tewowists & paedophiles.

[–] Melody@lemmy.one 31 points 1 day ago

Agreed.

Without concepts of privacy; things will soon fall into fascism.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

privacy respecting? telegram!

is that sarcasm or misinformation?

[–] kbal@fedia.io 46 points 1 day ago

They are presumably referring to SimpleX. Although I don't actually see anyone blaming it for the existence of Nazis.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Telegram is not private

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 15 points 1 day ago

Clickbait....

[–] GatoEscobar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 hours ago

Keep in mind jeff bezos use signal to prevent the fcc from reading their conversations