this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
584 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18935 readers
3178 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The GOP hold on most of American radio seems pretty unshakable, but Democrats must get into the talk-radio game before ever more damage is done.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You can literally see the generational technical divide which is not clean.

I'd bet most households /car owners could have their age and political alignments rated solely on a few metrics.

  • Do you watch cable? Do you stream shows? Do you pirate.

  • Do you own a car? Use the radio or Bluetooth? Have a Spotify or YouTube account?

You'd easily see people's politics fit in with where they get their content.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Car use wouldn't be a good metric in the US (maybe more so in other countries). It's too necessary in most places. But otherwise I agree.

Talk radio is a bastion of old white men. Trying to sway it is a lost cause. The only hope is out lasting their deaths.

If Harris wins I think we have good shot of things moving back towards sanity, especially if she lasts two terms.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 55 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Ronald Reagan started the fight to get rid of the Fairness Doctrine.

Back in the Cronkite Era, if a station ran an editorial it had to provide equal time for opposing views.

[–] GlobalCompatriot@lemm.ee 5 points 6 hours ago

And Clinton put the final nail in the coffin with the telecom Reform Act.

[–] Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Hold my beer!

-The Telecommunications Act of 1996

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 34 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Rush Limbaugh and his gross career owes its entire existence to that. He is someone who believes that drug dealers and smugglers need to be shot without trial... and he himself was a drug dealer when he was hard for cash.

Tells you a good deal of what kind of person we're dealing with here.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

He is someone who believes...

I just want to point out that this dude is dead in case you hadn't heard that piece of good news.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 33 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Even in Canada. Most talk radio stations are right wing hate BS.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 85 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

There should be regulation around use of the word "news". Many of these stations call themselves "News Radio" as if they only reported verifiable facts, but well over 50% is opinion.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Speaking of regulation, their hateful opinions getting such a far reach is a direct result of the telocommunications act of '96

[–] IcePee@lemmy.beru.co 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Whilst the act for which you speak definitely accelerated the bullshit, it wasn't peaches and cream back in the day. Just look at the film Citizen Kane a fictitious (and lawsuit resistant) depiction of William Randolph Hearst. In it an exceptionally wealthy business man uses the media to promote his political aims. And to skew narratives outside of strict politics. A man who craves love and adoration but can't reciprocate. Remind you of anyone? I would say Musk's purchase of Twitter fills at least one of those molds, Trump the rest.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

True and by way of conversation, Chinatown (1973) might as well have been made yesterday.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 28 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Anything presented as news should be kept separate from opinion. If it's news, you should be able to defend it like it was said under oath.

Personally, I would love it if news channels had to distinguish opinion content from news by removing the word news from the screen and replacing it with the word opinion. That or some other clear and unmistakable signal to the audience should be there to establish whether the station is going on record and asserting facts or whether this is some talking head spewing bullshit.

[–] Scrawny@lemm.ee 3 points 10 hours ago

It's crazy that news papers have been doing this forever. You have your news section and opinion and editorial section. TV and radio should definitely follow the format and be clear about what they are presenting.

[–] Pantsofmagic@lemmy.world 82 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

They tried with air America and it was ok but not really all that compelling. Truth and facts just don't sell like toxic divisive fantasies.

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago

Isn’t that how we got the national treasure that is Rachel Maddow?

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It needed better talent. Thom Hartmann was the sole survivor because he's actually listenable. Randi Rhodes and Ron Reagan were just shit. But progressive talk can be done well. Stephanie Miller is hilarious when she has the right crew, but she has a penchant for self-owning. She gave us John Fugelsang, who is just brilliant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rf_@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago

Go to the top podcast lists and you’ll see that one is also dominated by right-wing personalities too.

[–] eacapesamsara@sh.itjust.works 20 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

US fascism arrived before radio was invented.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 19 points 16 hours ago

"Has arrived," as though it hasn't been churning just beneath the surface since the beginning, and succeeding in lifting its filthy maw above the water line many, many times.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago

Those that talk the most are usually the ones you should listen to the least.

[–] GlobalCompatriot@lemm.ee 17 points 6 hours ago

US fascism had been here for decades. Too many people don't recognize fascism because they think fascism will arrive selling oppression and tyranny. If you're part of the privileged group fascism is selling you safety, normalcy, and tradition. (status quo)

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago
[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 10 points 16 hours ago

I don’t think there’s been one since Air America. Al Franken hung out there. Rachel Maddow.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago

No one who wants to hear what the left-of-right has to say listens to talk radio, but everyone who needs to hear it listens to talk radio.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Honestly radio is dying much like television.

Podcasting is the better space to get going.

Also tictoc.

We need to get the young folks of the incel pipeline .

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Podcasting is the better space to get going.

Joe Rogan and other right-wing cranks.

Also tictoc.

A significant part of the rise of fascism in Europe among young people.

Anyway I do like podcasts, and it's full of good content (and so is tiktok presumably) but neither are lacking right-wing content.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It's better in my opinion to meet people where they're at. Radio isn't where they're at. That was my point.

The Majority Report on YouTube is fantastic.

The Daily Beans.

Beau of the Fifth Column.

I've Had it Podcast.

Vaush.

Pod Save America.

Bad Hasbara.

There are many more, but it's a matter of putting ears and eyes on where they need to be.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Getting young folks off the incel pipeline is going to be really tough in today's environment.

Incel is the new fat. Most of society immediately treats them like scum that did it to themselves. In a lot of cases both fat people and incels are at fault, but trashing them isn't going to fix the issues.

Your need to understand them and how they got there to try and change them or at least reduce new ones from being created. Not just hate them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 8 points 16 hours ago

Can we start labeling opinion articles? It can be misleading

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 10 hours ago

The time to stop this fascist talk before it became a problem was 69 years ago

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

FOX News also.

load more comments
view more: next ›