this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
428 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

10464 readers
5255 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Granite@lemmy.world 16 points 2 hours ago

Feed the LLM with LLM generated books. No resentment at all!

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 71 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

How many of these books will just be totally garbage nonsense just so they could fulfill a rearranged quota.

Now the LLM are filled with a good amount of nonsense.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Just use the llm to make the books that the llm then uses, what could go wrong?

[–] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Someone's probably already coined the term, but I'm going to call it LLM inbreeding.

[–] Benn@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

It's quite similar to another situation known as data incest

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

I suggested this term in academic circles, as a joke.

I also suggested hallucinations ~3-6 years ago only to find out it was ALSO suggested in the 1970s.

Inbreeding, lol

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The real term is synthetic data

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 57 minutes ago

but it amounts to about the same

[–] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Soylent AI? Auto-infocannibalism

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

It can only go right because corporations must be punished for trying to replace people with machines.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 42 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

And they expect you to do this for free?

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Do they not have to pay for the privilege? Or is this not referring to academic publishing? (It’s not super clear, but context indicates academic?)

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 20 points 8 hours ago

If it is that makes it even worse. Academic publishers need to be abolished.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 8 points 7 hours ago

Nah, they get “Exposure”!

/s

[–] Rolando@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Anyone who reviews for the major publishers is part of the problem.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 hours ago

For profit corporations don't deserve your volunteer work.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

And yet if you aren't a reviewer it makes your CV look worse.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Soylent Green is a lie anyway. Your need to "soylentify" half the population to feed the other half every year if it would be the only source of calories.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 22 points 7 hours ago

No, the point is that they're just recycling the dissidents they were going to murder anyway.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 38 points 8 hours ago

Jfc that's gross