this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
59 points (95.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35335 readers
1249 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

@nostupidquestions Why do people like crt shaders in the retroarch community. There's so many videos about it. Is it a product of their time or are non-crt experiencers doing it?
Maybe it's a way for their smoothening upscaling shaders to look more pixelated and retro?

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Lots of these games were designed on and for CRT screens and they look worse on a modern one without filtering.

mario-kart-64-screenshot-vs-photo-of-the-game-on-an-old-v0-lcnpelwjiagb1

qzox2gzcyxe71

ERt2FS6VUAcvGNl-3612033001

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 9 points 12 hours ago

This thread is full of insane people because all of the comments are saying the CRT ones look worse. I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone here. Unbelievable.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I disagree. I emulate a lot, and the CRT stuff makes them look worse to me. Just adds noise to the image.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org -2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Either you are doing the shaders wrong and messing up the image, or you may need to have your vision checked....the CRT images are vastly superior to the non-crt ones. There really just isn't any other possible take on this, I'm sorry.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

There really just isn’t any other possible take on this

people can disagree on what they like better?

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I disagree, and the second image (which is reversed vs the others) doesn't look any better. It's just as bad in it's own way.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Its objectively more sharp

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You're absolutely right. I think everyone in this thread has glaucoma or something.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 0 points 7 hours ago

Shit, I better see a Doc. If only I could, but I have glaucoma or something.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It only looks better because of nostalgia. I think the filter-less ones look better.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Lol wut? Insane take. The CRT emulated ones look vastly superior. The non crt ones look pixelated as fuck.

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The pixelated look is fashionable at the moment. I wonder if that’s the reason.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I think people maybe expect old games to be pixelated just because they're old. (Because old = pixelated?) So when they see the CRT version look more blurred, they are confused and think it looks wrong. That's my guess

[–] Acamon@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Sorry to be dumb, but which ones are the crt ones?

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 12 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Assuming the right ones, except for the middle pic, looks like the left one. The person who replied with these should have mentioned which was which...

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The right ones.

CRT pixels weren't perfect blocks, making them look better with special care. It actually made some processes much easier to calculate as they could rely on that method to "round out" the image.

Edit: Except the second image

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 92 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

Old games were designed for CRTs. The way lines were rendered on the screen led to blurring and bleeding of colours which made them less pixely and looking like they’re much more detailed.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

These actually look fantastic with the filter on. Another commenter's examples were bad and I too thought it's just nostalgia, since the filtered ones looked worse there. In particular, the skeleton you showed gains so much depth.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The other commentor's comparisons showed literally the exact same concept, lol.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

It hurts me that the Castlevania screenshot does not match the pattern of the other screenshots with filter on the left and raw on the right.

EDIT: Thank you for fixing it.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

As a kid that grew up in the NES / SNES era and played these games on a CRT television, I think the sharp pixels look better. This is just going to be one of those subjective things.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 10 points 17 hours ago

TV pixels were also generally not square. And if the device was a TV and not an actual video monitor (both were used with home computers), it was a little slow and blurry. And overscan existed. There's a lot of things that will be a bit different when you look at an emulated display.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 7 points 17 hours ago

Same. I played a lot of the originals. I now emulate a lot on Steam Deck, and they always look better without the CRT stuff.

[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I love using CRT shaders on a game by game basis. As others commented, if it’s more detailed artwork, I’ll flip it on. Other times I don’t like how it looks with some classic games.

The only mod I do want is a way to replicate, on a modern monitor, the feeling of turning it off and putting your arm against the screen to get that sweet sweet static discharge that only CRTs could give you.

Edit: Removed my joke at the end of my original comment.

[–] kinship@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 hours ago

I did use CRT TVs and monitors, but only when very young. Man you just made me revisit a part of my brain long dormant! I loved the sweet static discharge as well, it was so f*ing rad!

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I think people who played those games on CRTs originally remember the feel of the visuals. It is a rather nostalgic thing.

The filters aren't the same, but they're not a bad approximation. Mist of those games were not meant to be played on modern hardware and look worse for it too.

Then there will be a ton of folk who just do it because they see other people do it. That's fine too, especially if they are enjoying themselves.

That's the point. If the filter makes you feel happier, go for it. It's an aesthetic choice.

[–] don@lemm.ee 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Fuck yeah it is. I still remember playing ff6(3us), a defining gaming moment for me, and it was played on a crt. Yeah I can emulate it on my current console, but that does almost no justice to the nostalgia of having first learned turn-based rpg combat.

This from a person that remembers their Dad’s 2600 and playing Yar’s Revenge on it, and him taking me to the local arcade where his favorite game was without a doubt Ms. Pac-Man, while I tried to figure out what the fuck this “Super Street Fighter II Turbo” wizardry was.

Fuck yeah, nostalgia. All generations will have it, including those that succeed us, and those that succeed them.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

People will knock nostalgia ... They see it as a sort of softness, a yearning for the past...

But what they miss is the way that it can create intergenerational connections.

That's a really lovely thing to hear about your relationship with your dad and Ms Pac-Man.

Wait, that sounds libellous.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago

Wait, that sounds libellous.

Made me actually laugh out loud

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 19 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Its more than nostalgia. The games actually look better because thats what they were designed with.

Nowadays people seem to use "nostalgia" as some hand waive to dismiss something as unnecessary or invalid. But in this case it is actually necessary, old games just do not look good on any display technology other than CRTs. Shaders come extremely close, and if you have an HDR compatible screen that gets bright and vibrant enough, shaders can be nearly comparable to real CRTs.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 4 points 19 hours ago

Now that I have a lovely HDR display, I kinda want to give this a bash. It also makes me wonder about CRT filters for non-emulated games. Fallout 2 looked amazing on a CRT, for example.

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 9 points 20 hours ago

Another commenter already gave a great example, I grew up using a crt for gaming and I turn the filter on on a game by game basis. It really does improve the quality of some games. Other games do not rely on it as much.

Mostly game with detailed art look better with it.