this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
186 points (97.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53925 readers
559 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Regular users in Sweden are in danger because a corporation needs to fill their pockets. Studios are suing your ISPs to get to you.

Use I2P. It will hide your IP address (among the many things it can do), afford you more privacy and allow you to torrent freely, even without a VPN/seedbox. The catch? You'll have to add the I2P trackers to your torrent.

I believe I2P is the way forward for piracy and I look forward to it getting bigger than it already is.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I set it up earlier and it felt like a highschool project. The AiO bloat, the GUI, lots of little bugs everywhere... The service didn't even stop when I ran i2p stop.

I'm not against it, but I do hope it gets a lot better.

[–] Findmysec@infosec.pub 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

The OG I2P program is written in Java, which might show behavior like you mentioned (didn't stop immediately when stopping the service).

Please try I2PD, it's written in C++

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

I agree, i2pd is so much better than the legacy Java client, it should really become the default client for I2P.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago

100% right this is the way of helping the piracy

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

A proper VPN provider is sufficient to protect against this though. If you, as a Swedish citizen, weren't already using a VPN, you were being an idiot.

I mean, it still makes sense to also use I2P, but it is currently not good enough as a full replacement.

[–] Findmysec@infosec.pub 28 points 4 days ago (3 children)

A VPN company can easily give up your details to the police who are now actively going after citizens. VPNs are not enough anymore.

Is there a problem with I2P adoption? I'm sensing a massive lack of interest from this thread

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (8 children)

If there are no logs, there is nothing to give up. There is no law that they have to keep logs as far as I know.

Don't get me wrong, I'm interested in i2p. Thanks for posting.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Abnorc@lemm.ee 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I admit that I’m skeptical since everyone is a node. It probably is fine, but I don’t know the risks that I take by volunteering as a node. I thought that VPNs can be fine as long as they don’t store logs, but I could be mistaken.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

A good VPN won't have any details to hand over that will convict you, even if they wanted to (e.g. mullvad), so they most definitely are enough.

And police are not going after citizens, rights holders are (like they always have been) by suing ISPs in hopes of getting your info.

What in don't like about I2P, is being a node for other peoples traffic.

[–] Findmysec@infosec.pub 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

VPNs log your IP. And Mullvad doesn't allow port-forwarding, which means you can't seed.

Being a node for traffic doesn't mean it can be linked to your identity, because everything is encrypted and metadata is scrambled. TOR node operators take much greater risks because depending on how they have set it up, it can lead to their identity being compromised. It's a small chance but it can happen.

I can't convince you. I only hope that people start seeing the need for it and begin reading the documentation to see its strengths

[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I use Mulvad, and seeding seems to work for me. Am I missing something?

and seeding seems to work for me.

You can only seed to people who have ports open. At least one side of the connection needs to be reachable.

It's people like me who keep ports available that are able to seed to you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 13 points 4 days ago

People who accepted this situation, promoted or even have implemented this are also idiots. Be warned, this can happen in every country, both US and in EU..

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 4 days ago (17 children)

Does anyone know of a fairly uncomplicated method to set up my seedbox, so I can seed on the clearnet and I2P at the same time, without having to store two copies of all my torrents? I already seed terrabytes of torrent data, and I don't want to store duplicates of all that.

[–] Findmysec@infosec.pub 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, Qbittorrent's I2P support is still experimental. Assuming your seedbox provider can let you run BiglyBT or any other client that can cross-seed, all you have to do is add I2P trackers to your torrent file. You can also upload your torrent files to Postman on I2P for them to be registered.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 days ago

Thanks for the informative reply

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I haven't used I2P since high school or maybe earlier if it existed then. Was it one of those faster the more people are using it things? I was skimming over setting up the docker container thinking even if I don't use it myself it might help others (and I have unlimited data on the isp plan) but I haven't gotten around to actually setting it up.

[–] Findmysec@infosec.pub 14 points 3 days ago

Yes, because it's P2P, every node acts as a router and thus distributes bandwidth to prevent congestion

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

remember kids do what johnny appleseed did and always seed more than you take.

[–] Findmysec@infosec.pub 9 points 3 days ago

If only people with the resources would seed

yes! Please seed more on i2p!

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 days ago

It's not big at all. But agree, this is the way.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have lots of questions. I’ve always heard to use a VPN that doesn’t keep logs, this is the first I’ve heard of i2p. If I add i2p trackers that implies I still have non-i2p trackers so can still be identified. I feel like I need way more information on how to do this safely before I change anything.

[–] Findmysec@infosec.pub 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Obviously, this doesn't change anything if you're still seeding to the clearnet. All this would do is cross-seed your torrents to the I2P network. I assume you have a suitable torrenting strategy already for the clearnet. If some day you were to abandon the clearnet for I2P, you would no longer need to take the precautions you do now because I2P is inherently private.

Please skim through the documentation for a high-level overview on I2P, and ask here if you don't understand something

[–] aida@lemm.ee 12 points 4 days ago

seed!!! I have already started my i2p setup and i will donate my bandwith

[–] narF@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Isn't it difficult to setup?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›