this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
272 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19159 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The presence of hard-right conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer alongside Donald Trump on the campaign trail in recent days has raised questions, including from some Republicans, about the influence the controversial former congressional candidate may have on him.

Ms Loomer is well-known for her anti-Muslim rhetoric and for spreading conspiracy theories, including that the 9/11 attacks were an "inside job" carried out by the US government.

She joined Trump at an event on Wednesday commemorating the attacks, raising eyebrows and prompting outrage in some US media outlets.

...

Now, she is known for her vocal support of Trump and for promoting a long string of conspiracy theories including claims that Kamala Harris is not black, and that the son of billionaire George Soros was sending cryptic messages calling for Trump's assassination.

These posts led her to be banned from a number of platforms including Facebook, Instagram and even, according to her, Uber and Lyft for making offensive comments about Muslim drivers. She once described herself as a “proud Islamophobe”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 108 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Wasn't it Laura Loomer, who started the whole Kamala gave BJs to get to her position? I guess it was truly just projection.

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 68 points 1 month ago

🌎🧑‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 29 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Still gross to make that accusation about someone as reprehensible as Loomer. And it let's Trump off the hook. She's not traveling with him because of sexual favors, she's traveling with him because he supports her insane views.

[–] Aphelion@lemm.ee 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The pictures of her with Mango Musalini make it look like they're sharing more than just a political viewpoint.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Herpes they are sharing herpes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Infynis@midwest.social 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just because she's a horrible person doesn't mean he's not also taking advantage of her. After all, "When you're a star, they let you do it..."

[–] StinkyOnions@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not a gross accusation when it's a gross truth.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheWilliamist@lemmy.world 85 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 44 points 1 month ago

That gross little toadstool isn't going to suck itself! Who do you think will do that? Melania? She's busy getting plowed by her favorite secret service agent in New York.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that word is doing some real heavy lifting here.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How so? On his plane multiple times.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've not heard it called that before.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Oh right, didn't get what was intended first time.

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

More like Firecracker I think.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I am really good at recognizing faces but every time I see a new pic of this lady I’m, "who the fuck is this?"

But the answer seems to be, a racist asshole.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

I had never heard of her until this week. To me, she looks like they took pictures of every woman Trump is known to have been attracted to in his life, made an AI mashup of all of them, and dyed her hair dark just to throw us all off.

[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

To be fair, with all the work she's had done she probably does look different every time you see her.

[–] Lobreeze@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She's only 31.

Let that sink in.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

That sink won't come in.

It's scared of whatever she did to her face.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Her face is fascinatingly odd and . . upsetting.

Born in Arizona in 1993, the self-styled investigative journalist has worked as an activist and commentator for organisations including Project Veritas and Alex Jones's Infowars.

BBC, don’t get played, man. That restraint you show with “self-styled” is just creaking terribly. Personally I would have gone with “considers herself” or “claims to be . . . despite [the obvious]”. Yeah yeah “objective”, look whatever you gotta tell yourself, man.

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Self-styled means “that’s what she calls herself”. Otherwise they would not include the qualifier.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

It’s also a “journalistically accepted” way to say “no she isn’t” while allowing that yes, she may be. My point is that they should lean harder into flat-out saying “no she isn’t”.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She's he's new cock socket. We all know it and see it. But the evangelical Christians will explain it away.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That's why I said socket and not sleeve

[–] Vipsu@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Reminds me of Melisandre from Game of Thrones tv-series (havent read the books).
Red haired witch that acts as kings counselor.

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Funny you said that. I saw her photo in the thumbnail, thought the same thing, and went down a Game of Thrones rabbit hole, came back, scrolled down and found your comment. Trump isn’t exactly a Stannis though.

[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or Firecracker from the boys 🤣

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think that's giving her (and him) far too much credit. This is more like a couple of mentally unwell drifters hooking up in an alley in between grifting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

She was the one that started the pet eating lies right? I thank her for making Trump look a fool.

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

I don't know about her involvement with this but there's a snopes article about it. It's wholly unfounded based on some random Facebook post.

A social media post originally from a Springfield Facebook group went viral nationally in recent days. The original poster did not cite first-hand knowledge of an incident. Instead they claimed that their neighbor's daughter's friend had lost her cat and found it hanging from a branch at a Haitian neighbor's home being carved up to be eaten.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cats-ducks-haitians-springfield/

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

I don't think she started it. Very well could have popularized it.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The saga of Laura's "slashed" tire.

It's always amazing to me when these idiots show up in public again after something like that.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Oh, I remember this bitch now.

That was hilarious.

[–] Plasma@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

She "outed" Lindsey Graham too

[–] courval@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Jewish white supremacists crack me up..

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Her and Stephen Miller should get married. It would save us all a lot of trouble of having to deal with them because they'd be too exhausted from out-crazying each other.

[–] rednalsi@lemmings.world 3 points 1 month ago

looming lunatic

load more comments
view more: next ›