this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
99 points (93.8% liked)

politics

18870 readers
4775 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Henry@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

Big reputation, big reputation

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

maybe 20-40k votes across GA, NC, FL?

That's with a gratuitous 10% conversion rate. Real rates are typically sub 1%. 3% would be phenomenal.

10k however is plenty depending on where in a state like NC or GA

[–] scarabine@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What are you thinking of when you say “conversion rate”? Like, is the top of your funnel people who saw the endorsement, I guess? If so, I agree, 1% of those converting into voters seems like a reasonable expectation.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

That's exactly right. Top of funnel to bottom of funnel conversion.

I'm basing my metrics on what I've personally seen trying to get people to convert in fundraising for leftist political causes. Depending on the mission, messaging, we had some hits. But generally, less that one percent. Getting some one to give you their money isn't that different than asking them to sign up to vote. It's pretty onerous of they haven't done it before. You also have to hit them multiple times with the same message, from different sides, to get them to do something like show up in person.

I'm not able to say where I came up with the gratuitous 10%, but I'd like to pretend Taylor has ⭐ ✨ power over the Swifties. However, reality is you gotta stay on people with involvement and repeated messaging, reminders, deep engagement to keep them "activated". I'm not sure a one and done from Taylor does that. But I'd rather enjoy a nice fantasy that she's able to grow the electorate a smidge in a few key states. that's far more fun.

[–] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I would imagine that they're all over, right? Her demographic is more age based (my assumption) so they aren't centralized anywhere.

[–] Blum0108@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think OP's point is that they are important swing states.

[–] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

OK, i read it as in what parts of those states they were living.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Some people forgot that political elections are a popularity contest when most of the constituents stop paying attention to policy and voting history, and politicians are usually pretty low on the popularity scale compared to musicians, actors, sports athletes, etc.