this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
143 points (93.3% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 65 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's been credibly pointed out elsewhere that Trump pulled a Hans Neimann:

It's well known that Donald Trump was using a bluetooth butt plug during the debate [...]

So I assume this is just projection.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  1. "Credible" according to who?

  2. There's not a chance in hell Trump lets anything near his ass. He'd consider it too weak and submissive. Besides... What if he actually liked it? 😱

  3. With his garbage diet, that asshole is greasier than a used-car-salesman slathered in lard ice-skating on a Teflon rink. The first time he shit his Depends (like he apparently did during his debate with Biden) any plug would have launched itself out of his asshole so fast he'd have Butler PA flashbacks.

[–] TurnpikeRangers@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In case you don't actually know, it's a joke/reference to a chess scandal where Hans Niemann was accused of cheating (by using a vibrating butt plug) in a game against Magnus Carlson

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I had forgotten and the joke was almost lost on me, thanks!

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago
  1. Unfortunately it looks like the original reports have been taken down (likely due to government censorship, if you ask my opinion) https://sh.itjust.works/comment/13855770
  2. I would be astounded if Trump has never paid for the services of a Dom.
  3. Hey, easy installation is a plus! I'm sure they'd use duct tape to keep it in place... err... gorilla glue might be more up to the task.
[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

He wears his butt plugs like a reverse chastity belt. Where someone people wear strapons, he wears strapins.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 month ago

He forgot about it though and wondered about that tingling. That explains his stupid face all the time.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And Trump wore a vibrating dildo up his ass that buzzed every time he lied, so at least that explains his behavior.

[–] NOPper@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Funny in this context but just a quick reminder that this gif is of the fat orange asshole mocking a disabled journalist.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Isn't any clip of him just him mocking someone?

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Woman performs better than man, only logical conclusion is that she cheated….smh

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago

If Harris could pull together a team quick enough to feed her those zingers live, she still wins.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Republicans just make shit up at this point.

[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 month ago

“At this point”?

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder how much of this stuff is open-eyed lying and how much is an instinctual identity defense mechanism. There's definitely a lot of both going on.

The cult of personality around trump makes his perceived power and competence one of the most important parts of the identity of his followers. Trump being a pathetic incompetent loser is a threat to their entire perception of reality. Believing one more gross improbability is just less stressful to a human brain than demolishing your worldview and starting again. In this way, even trump's supporters number among his many victims.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 month ago

open-eyed lying

Most of it. Remember when they slowed a video of Pelosi to make her appear drunk and when they cropped a person out of a video while Biden was talking to them to make it look like he was talking to no one? Steve Bannon and his ilk do shit like this and it's absolutely flat out lies. Lies and dirty tricks are ends justifying the means because they convince themselves they deserve power.

[–] MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Liars look in their bag of tricks and all they have are lies. One trick ponies.

[–] forrcaho@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It's easy to make shit up for people who never consider whether something is plausible as long as it suits their preferred narrative.

Trump said during the debate that

  • In Democrat-run states, doctors routinely commit infanticide.
  • Undocumented immigrants, despite their need to remain constantly vigilant about not revealing their illegal status, come in massive numbers to the US at the insistence of Democrats and succeed in registering to vote, and voting (for Democrats, of course).
  • Crime rates are plummeting in every other country in the world, because they all are sending their criminals to the US to commit crimes here.
  • Immigrants are kidnapping family pets and eating them.

Do Trump supporters actually take all that at face value? I ... cannot begin to understand how that is possible, but evidently it is.

[–] Bonifratz@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Lol... That's one way to admit Harris won the debate.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

All right-wing influencers have been exposed to pushing Russian propaganda. Laura Loomer can go fuck herself.

[–] gheesh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe if said influencer wanted to locate a cheater, should be looking closer to other ear allegedly shot recently.

[–] TheBraveSirRobbin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You're not saying there wasn't an assassination attempt right? Like yeah Trump cheats constantly and at everything he does, but the assassination attempt was real.

And no he probably didn't get shot in the ear, but it isn't some conspiracy theory either, he got hit by some shrapnel

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Laura can't even tell a new car tire from an old one. No one should listen to her opinion about anything.

[–] qantravon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I remember in 2015 there were images circulating after a debate claiming Hillary Clinton was wearing an earpiece, despite the pictures used as proof clearly being from a different event.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

CBS News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CBS News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/kamala-harris-earpiece-debate-false-claims-laura-loomer/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support