this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
218 points (98.7% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6622 readers
529 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uservoid1@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I hope my budget would allow me both fair-trade landmines and carbon-neutral nucs, both are important to keep our killzone environmental friendly.

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Fake newz

Carbon-neutral nukes aren't a thing, but don't need to be. Nukes have been well established to be a long term solution to global warming via Nuclear Winter.

The way things are going it may be our only way to keep from going extinct due to global warming. Not that it'd be much better.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Optimum usage detonates the weapon at higher altitude than those who proposed nuclear winter believed

Nukes used with the intention of doing the most damage throw the 2nd least amount of soil into the stratosphere

(2nd after maximum EMP attacks)

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 months ago

This is by UK artist Darren Cullen, aka SpellingMistakesCostLives. He also runs the Museum of Neoliberalism in the UK and has done a bunch of anti war/army/MIC pieces. All in all a decent dude.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago

Decimating population numbers is factually hella sustainable from the environmental pov.

[–] OutOfMemory@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago

I actually wouldn't mind some biodegradable landmines that were only dangerous for 5-10 years or something. Imagine if we had those in WW2 Europe or Vietnam, those places would be much safer now if we did.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 8 points 2 months ago

The seed bomb is actually viable. Coat the exterior in kudzu. The fragments will go everywhere and also kill your opponents long term production.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3524458/dod-exercises-option-on-second-micro-nuclear-reactor-design/

DOD Exercises Option on Second Micro Nuclear Reactor Design

Sept. 13, 2023

As part of the Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) initiative Project Pele, the Department of Defense (DOD) has awarded a contract option to X-energy, LLC of Rockville, Maryland in order to develop an enhanced engineering design for a transportable micro nuclear reactor.

The DOD uses approximately 30 Terawatt-hours of electricity per year and more than 10 million gallons of fuel per day—levels that are only expected to increase due to anticipated electrification of the vehicle fleet and maturation of future energy-intensive capabilities. A safe, small, transportable nuclear reactor would address this growing demand with a resilient, carbon-free energy source that does not add to the DOD's fuel needs, while supporting mission-critical operations in remote and austere environments.

Way ahead of you.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's actually pretty cool but for a wartime setting that would be one huge, centralized and vulnerable target

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There's been some research into space-based solar power by the DoD for that exact reason. It was a while ago, but launch costs have come down substantially and the idea is possibly viable at this point. And even back then, IIRC it was projected to be less than we spent air conditioning the desert in Iraq.

[–] Fedop@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago

Lazer guided seed bombs seems almost reasonable. And the impact creator tills the soil!

[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Phew. So glad we won't run out of energy to kill each other. Was getting worried there. /s

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

We need to look to the North Koreans for this kind of thing. They have a pretty decent army but they save lots of cost and environmental impact by not feeding them

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

Looks like the vatican flag if vexillologycirclejerk got their hands on it

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

This post reminded me of this Onion episode: How can we make the war in Iraq more Eco friendly