this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
258 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4089 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Curiously, the agrarians, ur-Americans of Southern Protestant extraction, were influenced by the leading figure of the French Counter-Enlightenment, the arch-reactionary ultramontane Catholic Joseph de Maistre. Even in the present day, a Southern apologist for slavery has written a screed for something called the Abbeville Foundation extolling Maistre’s hatred of republics. Evidently, despising the very governmental foundation of the United States has become fashionable for a certain type of reactionary conservative.

Émile Faguet, a French author and critic, called Maistre “a fierce absolutist, a furious theocrat, an intransigent legitimist, apostle of a monstrous trinity composed of pope, king and hangman, always and everywhere the champion of the hardest, narrowest and most inflexible dogmatism, a dark figure out of the Middle Ages, part learned doctor, part inquisitor, part executioner."

Maistre hits many of the key themes of American conservatism: religious dogmatism, belief over evidence, anti-scientism, the imperative of obedience to hierarchy and a habitual brooding over violence.

The author then continues on to wealth accumulation.

Wiki Link https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_de_Maistre

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've been saying the cons are not real patriots and that they hate the real America and the ideals of this country for decades now. Of course all cons will deny this, but so do many "moderates" that seek to tone-police such truths....but it's fairly obvious that the cons truly do hate this country.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 2 months ago

Agreed. Most everything they do is anti democratic.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's a reason they stop reading the Constitution at "We the people..." and celebrate the Confederacy.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The bigger words past that point in the document tend to give them trouble 🥺

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

If they ever get to the words "promote the general Welfare", they'll ban it in schools for promoting socialism.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They don't hate America, they hate what it's becoming. Which is to say, they want to go back to pre-civil rights, when you were effectively guaranteed success by being a straight, white, and male.

[–] 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And yet you've never really been effectively guaranteed success in America unless you were straight, white, male and already rich. And most of them aren't rich.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Used to be only land-holding white males had a right to vote. Let’s go back to that and reverse all the woke.

/s I hate that I have to append this for people to understand sarcasm.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Hell, isn't that what Elon is proposing? I think it was him saying it should just be tech bros running shit unless I've got the wrong idiot tech bro.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

they want to go back to pre-civil war

FTFY

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've seen some of them actually say they want to go back to the Middle Ages.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Well we’re gonna overshoot the warm period but I can offer the increase in pagan practices as part of the cultural zeitgeist

[–] Silverseren@fedia.io 6 points 2 months ago

When, of course, civil rights has little to nothing to do with it. The current issues with the country in terms of economy, such as rampant inflation, is the result of the very policies conservatives have been extolling for generations. To go back in the manner they want would mean to reduce and revert the impact conservative policies have harmfully built up over the generations.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 12 points 2 months ago

Dumb people being influenced by misinformation designed to crush the west.

[–] ALittleSticious@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago
[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

Salon - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Salon:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.salon.com/2024/09/07/the-far-right-actually-hates-america-its-dark-ideology-has-foreign-roots/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support