this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
276 points (98.3% liked)

politics

18986 readers
4155 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 86 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Let me try to understand:

  • Idiot Brain Worm betrays the Democratic party by running as an Independent to take votes away from Biden.
  • Idiot Brain Worm subsequently realizes he's actually taking more votes away from Felon Drink Bleach.
  • Harris enters the scene and the left builds up momentum causing the felon's outlook to look much worse.
  • Then Idiot Brain Worm gives up to help Felon Drink Bleach.

And all the while this oligarch has invested $1.6 billion into this criminal clown show? This was the best he could do?

[–] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You forgot the part where Idiot Brain Worm tries to join Harris

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A Trojan horse that had "I'm a big ol' fucking Trojan horse filled with fucking idiots that will try to fuck you up" written 6ft high on its side.

Luckily, the Harris campaign isn't as stupid as the "bought and paid for for far right billionaires" Kennedy campaign.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

RFK Jr wouldn't need to be a Trojan horse to fuck over Harris. He could do that just by being RFK Jr.

[–] Irremarkable@fedia.io 32 points 1 month ago

Hey now, he's not Felon Drink Bleach. He's Felon Inject Bleach. Very different!

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

It turns out wealth ≠ intelligence. Maybe for first gen wealthy, but all subsequent gens are wealthy because of familial inheritance.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Further goes to show that multi generational wealth often ends up in the hands of morons.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Almost exclusively, in fact. We mostly don't hear anything about it unless they star on a reality TV show, though, for two reasons:

  1. most media is owned by people they play golf with

  2. "rich person does nothing of value" isn't a great headline. Hell, generalize it to the absolutely factual "most rich people do nothing of value" and both Forbes and Fortune will probably sue you 🤷

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"Timothy Mellon, the reclusive heir to a Gilded Age fortune, has poured over $165 million into the 2024 election so far, with tens of millions backing both Donald Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr."

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Are we sure it wasn't this Melon?

[–] dynamic_generals@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They let him off easy. I couldn’t figure out how exactly they’re related, but Richard Mellon Scaife is a big part of the reason we’re in the political mess we are today day. Americans distrusted corporations in the 1970s - tobacco, Dow Chemical, Nader’s Unsafe at Any Speed… also low income inequality. In response, future SCOTUS Justice Powell - who was on the board of Philip Morris and close friends with GM’s general counsel wrote what was intended to be secret memo for members of the US Chamber of Commerce:

‘Attack on American Free Enterprise System’ was written to transform corporate America into a “vanguard.” Contents include “the American economic system is under attack… [enemies are] perfectly respectable elements of society…the college campus, the pulpit*, the media, the intellectual and literary journals, the arts and sciences, politicians.” Capitalists need to wage “guerrilla warfare” against those seeking to “insidiously” undermine them. “Capture public opinion by exerting influence over the institutions that shape it - academia, the media, the churches, and the courts - to control debate at its source.” Said donors should demand a say in university hiring and curriculum and “press vigorously in all political arenas.” Key to victory is “careful long-range planning and implementation” with a “scale of financing available only through joint effort.” The memo spurred the ultra-conservative foundations to weaponize their “philanthropic” giving to “fight a multi-front war of influence over American political thought.”

The Coors family heeded the call first, followed by Mellon Scaife who massively overshadowed the Coors’. These foundations, that only existed for inheritance tax avoidance, were weaponized right at this moment… two months before Powell was nominated to The Court.

That’s how close we came to living in a good timeline.

And I’m only 1/4 of the way through Jane Mayer’s Dark Money; maybe just a tip of an iceberg. I’d suggest it’s required reading for every American. I should add Mayer is also responsible for unmasking Clarence Thomas in Strange Justice, the source for nearly everything we know about his grotesque history. I haven’t read it.

*this was pre-Moral Majority, but not by much.

Holy shit. TIL. I’ll have to read those books, for sure.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s how close we came to living in a good timeline.

That's not how politics works. That's not even how time works.

If you want change, you have to do something. That's how we got the minimum wage, etc. Not by being in a "good timeline".

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As always: follow the money

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i am, but keeps running faster

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Filthy running? I'd like to see THAT As an event at the LA Olympics 😄

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 month ago

"Billionaires in both parties should not be able to buy elections," said Sanders. "For the sake of our democracy, we must overturn the disastrous Citizens United Supreme Court decision and move toward public funding of elections."

Exactly.