this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
389 points (98.0% liked)

Memes

45620 readers
1342 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wait is this a thing, have they said this already? (I fully assume they will but missed it if they already have)

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's referring to Threads.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, but has threads made an official statement like this yet on defederation rules? I'm an instance owner so I'm pretty sure I'd just reply back "lol"

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

I saw that mentioned on Mastodon, but honestly don't care enough about Threads to actually look at their TOS. Seems likely though given they're all about making it as bland and corporate friendly as possible.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does it have to be said? If you allow certain things they're definitely blocking you

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no of course not, it's obvious, I was just surprised they already said the quiet part out loud, right now they seem to be all "buddy buddy" like we're all stupid

[–] Jimbo@yiffit.net 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well there are apparently users here who want to see Threads content. I don't know why you would want that, and here of all places...

I mean, I wish celebrities were jumping on other options rather than "ooo shiny new facebook", they're the only ones I would personally follow, but other than that if you want to follow me choose a platform that federates

[–] Kushia@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

They can sign up a free account on Threads, no need to bring that here.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Every instance will defederate from another if they are not acting in the way that they want. I don't see why Threads would be any different.

I guess the difference may be that the policies are much more restrictive rather than something like "is a frequent source of spam and hate speech" but there is always going to be a policy.

[–] SwissJackalope@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago

"We will defederate you!" "Ok me first"

[–] PaigePalisade@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please use this official mascot for Calckey because it's funnier Calckey mascot smoking a blunt

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago
[–] OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I consider this to be a bad development. I could see Facebook/Meta aggressively growing to become the "default" server, then squashing everybody else. Not to mention all the US intelligence fuckery that will be potentially happening.

We laugh at this now, but in a few months we might have server admins enforcing Meta TOS on their users for fear of being cut out from the biggest part of the Fediverse.

I'd propose that right from the get-go, a bunch of instances should band together and defederate from Threads.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Defederating from Threads by default is absolutely the right move.

[–] OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Yup, if other corporations follow Threads into the fediverse, history will repeat itself. They'll do to the fediverse what they did to the rest of the internet.

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 2 points 1 year ago

Can confirm, already defederated them from my lemmy

[–] Marketsupreme@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm out of the loop on what meta is trying to do with lemmy. Can you catch me up?

[–] JoshNautes@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not exactly, Lemmy. But Meta created a new app similar to Twitter and said they will join the Fediverse with this app in the future, só you could potentially interaction with Threads' content with your Lemmy or Mastodon account without having to create a Meta account or downloadind their app.

[–] Marketsupreme@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

God that makes me feel icky

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

This is sort of how Google's Chat tool ended up rolling with the XMPP community. Their initial chat system was federated (this is pre-federation, but the concept was essentially the same) with the XMPP servers of the world. You could use their pre-hangouts Messaging app across the XMPP world.

Then, when Google was unhappy with how the XMPP standards were moving they defederated, replaced their entire protocol and stole the user base from the XMPP community.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly meta should federate with a different social media company with a large userbase (ie twitter if they joined the fediverse for some reason)

[–] OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to disagree, but I think that's really unlikely, unless they do a corporate merge.

Honestly, this is the biggest part that's bugging me about it the most. Meta is probably doing this to ride on the wave of the Reddit exodus, but it's not unreasonable to assume that other corporations will follow suit if Threads succeeds. And when that happens it'll be like the internet all over again. Corporations coming in and setting up ad-infested data-gathering fiefdoms that will squeeze everyone else out.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

That's exactly why we should not federate with platforms that are so much bigger

[–] ZekeSulastin@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn’t that what every instance already does?

[–] Trifictional@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea but the difference is most instances have ethical reasons for banning certain content.

Meta could randomly decide anti-meta content doesn’t belong on their platform. I wouldn’t be surprised if this is already the case.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

[you have been banned from Threads]

[–] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

“You can’t ban me because I quit”

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

"You can't quit, you're a lizard."

[–] nekat_emanresu@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll believe it when I see it. The fact they allowed it the first step on the majority of instances(by user count) means when we cool off they will win the next step too.

[–] rarely@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Think of meta like reddit. Don't want to be on facebook via federation? Just post jonny O or NSFW. Not like facebook is going to do anything but defederate from your instance. Kind of like how all instances work.

[–] nekat_emanresu@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm surprised that nsfw spam is a viable trick. It makes sense, it just feels so weird to be viable. I'd expect it to mysteriously become against the rules as per my above post though. I'd prefer to talk about meta and their help towards genocide etc though. I'll have to start making a list of their dirty deeds.

[–] rarely@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Thats some good stuff for a bot to keep signing up and posting to facebook proper. But don't listen to me I have bad ideas

Lmao wait did they actually try that…?

[–] mawkler@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the name of the fediverse services in the image, beside Mastodon and Pixelfed?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The three triangles is PeerTube, the F is Friendica, and don't recognize the last one.

[–] skylestia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

i think that's Calckey, another microblogging software like Mastodon with an arguably prettier interface

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Ah yeah that sounds right.

load more comments
view more: next ›