this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
315 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18935 readers
3178 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Democratic National Convention again surpassed its Republican counterpart in viewership numbers Tuesday night, with an average of more than 20 million Americans tuning in compared to the RNC’s 14 million on its second night—a nearly 39% difference.

The event even garnered roughly 500,000 more viewers than its first night—a historical anomaly, according to Nielsen data.

Typically, fewer viewers tune in to the conventions on the second night.

The 2024 convention is the first Democratic conference to have higher ratings on the second night in the last decade—most likely propelled by the primetime speeches given by former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I mean. It's going to every night, and I'd be real surprised if the RNC ever had more viewers....

Democrats are the majority of voters, Republicans live in the areas with the majority of empty land.

Unfortunately we dont live in a straight democracy

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago

If only we could make Republicans think that means we live in a gay democracy, because it's not straight...

[–] BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

I think Republicans are also generally disengaged. That's what enables them to vote for so much monstrous garbage; they don't pay enough attention to know what they're voting for. There are also plenty of true believers who really are christian nationalists, but for most people, if they follow the policy positions, they'd be Democrats.

So when it comes to the number of people watching a convention, the DNC sorta naturally attracts more people since the base is paying more attention.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

Independents are a majority of voters, nearly double those that identify as Democrat

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hooray but it means NOTHING.

Get the fuck out and vote. Get your lazy ass friends and family to the polls ffs.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

The two good things about high ratings are:

  1. It shows engagement is high
  2. It's the kind of metric that Trump cares deeply about

But yes, polls, ratings, news articles, and all those things didn't matter, just election votes matter.

[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Legit my first thought was "why are we celebrating TV RATINGS like they somehow equate to voting?"

You can have 50,000,000 people watch the same TV show but not buy any merchandise. A lot won't even have the ability to purchase something from the show.

And I sure plenty of people watching last night won't be able to vote for one reason or another.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Legit my first thought was "why are we celebrating TV RATINGS like they somehow equate to voting?"

It's Horse Race season. Barring anything really exciting like "her emails" all they have is polls. We'll see hundreds of "Polls say this" and "Polls say that" headlines in the next 11 weeks.

[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, the "front page" of lemmy is basically "POLLS? POLLS!" already but I'm positive it'll get 10x worse.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

What? They equate more to a poll. Why would anyone equate it to voting? Wtf?

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

pretty sure obama could stand up and talk about foot fungus for 2 hours and get higher ratings than anyone in the GOP

[–] poke@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Let me be clear, shower shoes.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I remember how the qons kept talking about Biden was going to lose because "crowd sizes" or "enthusiasm" and that if he actually won, that was proof the election was stolen in 2020 because he was "campaigning from his basement".

Where are all those people now, I wonder?

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

Still in St. Petersburg where they always were, hoping Vova doesn't send them to a border checkpoint.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Ask Herman Kane. He loved those big crowds.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

Being used as cannon fodder in Russia.

The only reason I care about this metric is because I know Trump is probably losing his mind over it <3

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

I watched the video of Obama's speech on yt last night. Great speech, but what struck me most was how many obvious bot accounts were trying to spread negative messaging about Democrats in the comments.

Now yt comment sections aren't exactly known for being a great place to discuss things but I've never seen that amount of blatant astroturfing all in one place. I scrolled through over a hundred of the top comments and 80% were from accounts with the "firstname-lastname-4digit#" type of username and little or no account activity aside from comments. This was 3 hours after the video was originally posted.

We really need to address bot activity on the internet because people are way too easily swayed by stuff like that. We're making it almost trivial for bad actors to control the narrative in ways that are not good for society.

[–] Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure all these stupid posts are just the media punishing the weak and weird mind of some egotistical psychopath who would care about "ratings" , "crowd size" and "popularity". Any idea who?

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

it's probably even more since the majority of the audience probably watched the kamalaharris or demconvention live streams.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Glad the DNC has.