this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024
387 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19090 readers
2950 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tim Walz promised a “joyous” Democratic National Convention in a lightning round of brief speeches Monday morning—pointedly not mentioning Donald Trump or JD Vance.

“What we’re going to show America over the next three days is what democracy looks like,” he said in his very first appearance at the event, a breakfast for delegates from Wisconsin. “It’s joyous, it’s inclusive."

“We understand what the alternative is. That doesn’t motivate people. It’s not just beating those guys. It’s about setting a course for our future that’s brighter for everyone.”

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 172 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I actually hate this headline and story. It should have solely focused on what Walz said, and avoided mention of the other guy, too.

[–] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 41 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Came here to say this - I'm new to Lemmy, and I feel like there's this overwhelming tidal wave of Trump posts here, even moreso than Reddit or other social media. I get it, he's a shit human being. But maybe unless he actually does something, we don't have to talk about him?

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy is still small, and so broad fields like news, tech and politics dominate the feed - and Trump is a pressing enough topic at the moment to have posts about him get a lot of traction. It's the height of an American election year and the threat of Project 2025 has people justifiably anxious.

I recommend cultivating and heavily curating community subscriptions, and sticking to your subscribed feed as your default home page. That way you can almost entirely avoid anything Trump related until you yourself choose to engage with it.

[–] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I like politics and news - most of my subscribed is some variant of that. There's just so much more to politics and news than Trump, and as long as you're not in the cult there's not even anything interesting or engaging that he says or does. It's just a circlejerk of "Trump bad" and I don't understand how people aren't tired of it - or maybe they think they're helping?

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

Be the change, post! Right now most of the posts in any given community are from a handful of really active people. They're posting what they want to see or what they think everyone else wants to see. More posters and more diversity is a good thing.

[–] Telstarado@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Can also add filters for Trump and Vance in your user settings (I'm on Connect) and stop most related posts from coming up in your feed. Was able to rescue myself from a tidal wave of Sailor Moon Ai posts in my feed that way 😁.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Here's the thing..

Trump gets clicks.

Even the most left wing media LOVE printing his name.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Here's another thing. Everyone blames media, and they have their fair share, but "we" the consumer are clicking on those stories. That trains the news media to print his name more. We are part of the problem too.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 5 points 2 months ago

Not much longer. Just this week, and its Monday, I've seen at least 5 Trump stories all summarized as old man yelling at clouds. I'm not gonna bother reading that shit anymore. There's nothing that man can say or do that'll shock me enough to bother reading about it.

Similar with the couches, diapers, ear bandage and seemen glasses. It doesn't faze me anymore. It's a one trick circus.

We all have that friend who always one-ups or craves attention by doing or talking about crazy shit you won't even believe. It stops being outrageous.

Seeing media reporting on it is a lot like seeing an old childhood acquaintance in your birth town telling you about the binge drinking they had at the local bar yesterday. Cool story bro, but I think we grew apart, I have more important stuff to do and I don't really care about the outrageous shit anymore.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 3 points 2 months ago

Well it's a bit of both. Individual choices matter but not as much as corporate choices. It's the corporations that manufacture clickbaity headlines and use psychological tricks to make us do things more easily.
We can stop clicking all we want but if corpos are not forced to stop this kind of behaviour, nothing will change.

It works for many things, individual choices are important but the orders of magnitude between them and corporate actions are vastly different.

[–] TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean, he mentions them too… just not by name. But also, him focusing on policy/good stuff/etc. IS news because Biden’s entire campaign was “hi I’m not trump” so it kinda does bear saying wow thank god he is talking about actual stuff and not trump.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Presidential politics in a nutshell.

30,000 words printed on what a tan suit means for foreign policy. Nobody wants to talk about who will replace Secretary of State.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Trump will complain about that in 3....2...

[–] StThicket@reddthat.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Noone knows complaining better than I do. I'm the best complainer, and I know people in the industry that say I'm better than anyone they've ever met.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

More or less. An actual quote:

“I do whine because I want to win and I’m not happy about not winning and I am a whiner and I keep whining and whining until I win.”

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 months ago

GASH: Great Article, Shit Headline...

heated ranting list of clickbait titles

BREAKING NEWS:

  • Trump did not publicly insult a woman or person of colour for at least a few hours today, we'll update the story as this progresses!
  • Trump did not wake up today and immediately utter a lie!
  • Trump was not in the room when Tim Walz delivered a speech!
  • Trump was not part of the speech except in vague references to Republicans!
  • Trump's name wasn't written on any of the decorations!
  • Trump does not have a reservation at the hotel Walz spoke at!
  • Trump Trump Trump!

I'm so sick of this shit. Watching Trump struggle brings long-awaited joy, but the absence of his involvement being the title of a story is just absolutely vexing. Please tell me more about the Harris campaign and put the spotlight there.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 months ago

We mentioned them so you don't have to!

[–] Steve@startrek.website 12 points 2 months ago

He obviously did mention them but not by name

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

But thedailybeast can't help themselves...

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 5 points 2 months ago

Wow, it's like he actually listens to his voters!

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

He does mention them, but not by name. There's no story here.