this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
75 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

20 readers
4 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

The threat suggests that Threads is the most serious rival yet to Elon Musk’s chaotic social platform.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wagesj45@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't believe that "240 character social media post" is somehow a trade secret. What are they expecting to tell the judge and not be laughed out of court?

[–] moon_matter@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It might be possible to patent it. Look at Wizards of the Coast and all their crazy card game patents. But the only reason they were able to do that is because their patents are incredibly detailed and specific. So they could change it to 256 characters or something and be fine.

[–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IIRC Threads is 500 characters, not 240, so that wouldn't be a something they could sue over.

However, Twitter has over 2000 patents filed, over 1400 of which are registered in the United States. They deal with malicious advertisement detection & remediation, malware, automatic management of data processing, mobile app management, interactive advertising, and electric publishing to name a few.

I can see where Musk may have found similarities between the software somewhere in the mess of their patents.

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But just how would they know the internals of Threads? According to Meta, even Twitter's claim that Threads devs include ex-Twitter employees is wrong.

To me it sounds like Twitter's legal action is just an obstruction tactic.

[–] EvilMonkeySlayer@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I believe that's what discovery is for.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Smells of desperation to me. I mean, if I saw a competitor pop up overnight and gain ten million users in a single day, I'd be looking for ways to stop it too. I mean, after cleaning the worry diarrhea out of my pants.

[–] crowsby@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PabloDiscobar@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good, let the lawyers feast on their corpses.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

"Zuckerberg or Musk?"
"Yes."

[–] Rabbithole@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Upvoted for the random Vorador reference.

[–] TipRing@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This seems like a pretty heavy lift for Twitter and while I hardly support Meta, if Twitter somehow manages to win sole ownership of the concept of microblogs it would be bad for everyone.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So long, Mastodon. (On the plus side, so long Frank Speech, Truth Social, Gab, etc. etc. etc.)

[–] blivet@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Yeah, my first reaction to this story was, why didn't they sue any of the other Twitter clones before this?

[–] MoogleMaestro@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Because it's a big waste of time and won't get anywhere. The fact that mastodon has been a thing since 2018 (or earlier) unopposed means that they will have a really hard time proving that they ever had any trade ownership over the concept of microblogging.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Rabbithole@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sorry Elon, but...

I'm fairly sure you don't get to axe most of your staff, refuse (illegally) to pay their severance packages and then sue another company because they hired your now, ex-employees, on the grounds that it's stealing from your company...

[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope he does go through with the lawsuit, it would be hilarious. I'm hoping for a ship of theseus argument.

[–] mPony@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm hoping for a mask-off "I paid them once so I own them forever" argument.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Twitter is apparently also struggling to pay for all the individual arbitration claims they forced their ex-employees to engage in rather than a class action, yet now they want to take on a lawsuit against Facebook? Do they honestly think they can come out ahead here?

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yaccarino's post makes me want to retch. What a load of quasi-inspirational, self-aggrandizing, suffocatingly corporate trash.

[–] sab@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Figured I'd read it to see what you're talking about.

  1. watch the tweet load, while it reads "view on Twitter"
  2. "[...] And that's irreplaceable. This... Show more"
  3. watch bird for three seconds
  4. watch balls spinning for seven seconds
  5. No, I do not want to accept your cookies.
  6. No, I do not want to sign in with Google.
  7. "...is your public square. We're often imitated -- but the Twitter community can never be duplicated."

The effort and wait was worth every single one of the 15 words. Truly an irreplaceable platform.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anyone else thinks it's funny that journalist always have to explain/describe what Meta is? Be it the parent company of Facebook, Whatsapp or Instagram.

[–] GizmoLion@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm glad they do. Meta's name change shouldn't free them from the reputation they earned with facebook. Pin the old name to them whenever possible.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just call them Facebook, like everyone and their mother still calls Google Google. Fuck them thinking they can steal other people's name and sue them for it.

[–] asteroidrainfall@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What if Zuck comes out of his lizard hole and utters the word:

FEDIVERSE.

to proclaim that Meta, formally known as Facebook, is now changing their name to Fedi.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RheingoldRiver@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Never forget that Xfinity is just Comcast. Comcast is Xfinity. Comcast and Xfinity are the same thing.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think anyone but Google itself takes the name "Alphabet" seriously, either.

[–] blake@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It really only gets used legally.

[–] GizmoLion@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Alphabet owns Google, Google isn't alphabet per se.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Google is Alphabet. It was created by restructuring its companies under one umbrella company.

[–] Ragnell@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Finally, things are getting good. Hope the Coliseum is still available.

[–] theinspectorst@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Elon has carved his name onto it in anticipation.

[–] swope@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm curious who books the Coliseum and for what events. Is it available for weddings?

[–] xc2215x@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Same here. Let them fight.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Remember: Musk has a bottomless money pit.

I hope to see it run out during my lifetime.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The Lawyer moshpit will begin. Money is likely to be made, but fuck me these legal cases seem tiring to even be near.

[–] VulcanSphere@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Arguing a general concept such as certain limit of microblog copyrightable or trade secret is silly enough, hopefully court will throw out the lawsuit if Musky insisted to fill it.

Unless Meta really copied codes from Twitter.

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

What a joke. Meta would not need ex-employees or “trade secrets” to create a Twitter clone.

[–] thingsiplay@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

@koncertejo I need more popcorn. This saga is longer than the entire Lord of the Rings films.

load more comments
view more: next ›