this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
479 points (94.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35441 readers
1293 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

They also encourage you to provide info on yourself (create an account, provide birthday) to even use the screen on the seat back…

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IamAnonymous@lemmy.world 61 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Isn’t the WiFi free? It’s free for a reason. You aren’t forced to use it.

[–] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 72 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I mean they paid for the flight

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago (3 children)

And they’re getting a flight.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 43 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Flights have amenities. Some give you free food, some free wifi.

None of it is actually free of course. It's just that the cost is included in the ticket price.

[–] owatnext@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't want food or WiFi. I want legroom so I can sleep. I don't want seatback entertainment. I don't want a complimentary tea towel, blanket, and neck pillow. I don't want your stupid cheapo earbuds. I don't want Tim Tams and that little sachet of Vegemite with my toast. I don't want your gross instant coffee. I don't even want a flat white. I don't care that you have soymilk. And thay muffin you gave me has egg in it. I told you I can't have egg. I don't want your little tiny tube of toothpaste with that miniature toothbrush. I don't want to watch Adam Sandler's Wedding Singer on that screen you have on the wall in front of the aisle. I want legroom. I want to watch the insides of my eyelids. I hate having to lay my legs sideways for hours and being unable to relax or sleep because I am knees-pressed against the seat in front of me. And that camera on the seat back freaks me out. Why why why. Just let me sleep.

Sorry. I got a bit agitated there.

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Camera on the back of the seat? I haven't seen that one yet, will have to bring tape on my next flight

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Legroom is probably the most expensive thing to give on a plane, so if you want legroom, pay for the privilege and fly business class. Otherwise, at least try to enjoy the few concessions you get from the airline

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I mean if the price of wifi is offset by showing a single ad, it seems preeeetty stingy after you already paid for a seat.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

spirit CEO ^

load more comments (1 replies)

I understood the mildly infuriating aspect to be how airlines find a way to extract value from you at every step of your trip.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago

For real. I'd rather watch an ad than have to pay $10+ for a couple hours of wifi.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 months ago

I still open Plex and sync a bunch of shit to my phone or tablet before I take any flights. Old-school is still the way.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 58 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Plane WiFi is a modern technological marvel and you're lucky to be able to have it at all.

Not so long ago sat phones were the domain of the super rich, because they were paying several dollars per minute. Then it was down to 10 dollars for two hours of multiplexed satellite access. And now apparently it's down to where advertising will work. That's amazing.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Any plane internet I've used has been spotty and terribly slow, but then again, I haven't bought it in years because of previous experiences. I can stand to be without it for 2.5 hours.

[–] Sparky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago

The speed is probably because you have to share 2mbps of bandwidth with 100+ people

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] prayer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Plane wifi, in the Continental US, is typically done via cell networks. The plane just has stronger receivers and transmitters than your cellphone.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 months ago

No, it's mostly ViaSat (like in OP's picture) now. Gogo never upgraded their infra to handle more traffic and kinda fell out of relevance. Planes with ViaSat will have large oval satellite domes on top that talk up to space.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I doubt the ads are streamed over the internet, this could easily be done with local storage.

With a possible quick database update over the internet to log views

[–] somewhiteguy@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's a free wifi service provided by the airline while on the flight. One ad, when most other places are charging $10-20 per flight? I'll watch the single ad. I'd rather that then someone, say, injecting adverts into sites and services. which is very possible.

[–] treeofnik@discuss.online 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Agree, which is why this is mildly infuriating and not worse. Of course there were about 10 minutes of unskippable ads on their media screens before take-off which was a pleasure to be subjected to. That should get everyone free WiFi without needing an additional ad..

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The more infuriating thing will be realizing that the inflight wifi is basically only good for texting and email.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

At least they don't charge like $10 per hour to go at 64 kbits

More infuriating is the forced login on the infotainment screen. That's extremely infuriating

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 months ago

I once had a flight in two legs where the first leg was operated by a well known established airline for an okay ish price and the second leg was operated by a "sister" airline that did shorter ultra low cost flights. The first flight had infotainment screens and a few other minor comforts that are standard for economy flights these days and make it just slightly more bearable, whereas the 2nd flight had no screens, no food without paying separately and just made as uncomfortable as possible on purpose.

During the first flight, you could use their crappy as screens on the back of the chair in front or connect to their local network with your own device, which was free and didn't involve any shenanigans like ads or accounts. I made use of the service which worked by entering a URL printed on the back of the chair in front. On the second leg, there was no screens and no apparent mention of an onboard entertainment offering through your own devices but there was some sort of QR code which I assume was supposed to take you to a payment portal or something but which didn't even work. It was a different URL to the first flight.

I still had my tab open from the first flight though, and when I accidentally opened that tab on the second flight, I got access to the seemingly hidden entertainment service with no payment or logins or anything. Seems that sometimes it's just a question of knowing the magic URL.

[–] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

It sucks but I like this over what target and walmart do. If you wanna use their wifi now you MUST create an account on their website and use that to login to their wifi.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

on the bright side they could make you watch an ad to check your bags, check in, and find your seat the way things are going

[–] chimasterflex@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Execs are furiously taking notes right now

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago
[–] Sparky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Wireguard vpn+pihole and you won't need to watch those ads. Set it up to use an ntp port, and you won't have to sign in to use the wifi.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ntp is the time protocol, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hol@feddit.uk 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Hold up, using the ntp port to skip WiFi sign in is a game changer. Any way to do that with Tailscale on iOS?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The airplane captive portals generally don't work if you use a different DNS.

I've always had to defer to "automatic" DNS and let DHCP give me the DNS address in order to access the wifi

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

is it free? I mean you either pay with money, time and/or data.

[–] Jilanico@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If the ad is short and subsidizes free wifi, I ain't mad. But if the ad is unreasonably long, or if I have to keep watching ads every x minutes to use WiFi, it becomes a problem. Not sure what the case is here, but it should be spelled out on the screen so we know what we're getting ourselves into.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And they all interrupt the "in flight entertainment" to read a VERY long and slowly delivered advertisement for their proprietary credit card (and in flight entertainment that you have to supply device for, so you end up with smaller screen, unstable connection, battery drain and watched at a painful viewing angle typically)

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As opposed to an open source credit card?

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Proprietary, as in, branded specifically to the airline itself. Like a Allegiant credit card, for example.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] warm@kbin.earth 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They can't be making much off this surely, how long would the ad have to be for it to even be worthwhile showing?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is there a way to capture these pages and report them to uBlock filter authors once online? I'd like to add a filter (or better, userscript that just enables and "clicks" the "continue" button) for my country's rail company's Wi-Fi captive portal but the JavaScript is obfuscated or compiled from another language so I have no idea what anything does, and of course the element classes are all randomized.

[–] theotterone@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Can confirm that on Android with Firefox mobile + ublock origin the ads wouldn't load and you were able to skip quite fast. (Not agreeing with the ads being displayed at all, that's just a greedy move)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheRealCharlesEames@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

So does Delta/T-Mobile

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago

You might be able to bypass it with Orbot and a snowflake. Alternatively don't use it.

[–] padge@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I flew on Porter and their "ad" was just a 30 second thing about how they're a cool airline. That's fine, although the real cost is that they make you have a rewards account

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›