this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
102 points (94.7% liked)

Privacy

31798 readers
247 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I tried looking for lists but didn't find any.

The Work Number is US-specific and where your employers input your salary data for future employers to see. You can opt out here: https://employees.theworknumber.com/employee-data-freeze/.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Old_Jimmy_Twodicks@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Did Obama do anything relating to this?

[–] Old_Jimmy_Twodicks@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The CFPB was authorized by the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010. In addition to helping get Dodd-Frank through Congress, Obama appointed Elizabeth Warren as a special advisor to the Treasury in order to oversee the CFPB and help get it off the ground.

Also, I just like saying "Thanks, Obama"

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I pretty well hate the whole concept of capitalists building a profile about me to better manipulate me. None of this should be legal. Don't wanna give me a loan without all this information? Good. Don't give me a loan. Now get rid of my data. That shit is nobody's business but mine. It's almost certainly used for discrimination and mass manipulation as well. It's the kind of thing one would use to knock down their political opposition.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago

Shocked face

[–] StaySquared@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

WTF.. When did employers start reporting our income into a national/international database for other employers to view? Is it even mentioned in our contracts with the employer?

[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Since doing so allowed them to see other data. Then they can use it for making offers that are as low as possible.

Basically it raises their bargaining power. They know how much you make now and will use that to scale their offer.

Capitalists will minimize costs. It is their job.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Remember, sharing your income information with co-workers is evil and bad.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And of course freezing this data is possible, but you have to mail it in, along with proof of identity. 🙄

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I'd rather it be deleted.

[–] BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 months ago
[–] Anonymouse@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Consider what would happen if employees across the globe posted to an open database about their employer, position title, salary bonus and health care information. I'm sure we'd all be sued. How is this legal?

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Anonymouse@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

🤔

I haven't been out there in 15 years. I'll have to check it out again!

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Why would we be sued? It's definitely not illegal here in Canada to discuss your employment details.

[–] Anonymouse@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't know the legal side, but employers don't want you to talk about your compensation with anyone. Maybe it's legal, but definitely frowned upon.

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 months ago

Sounds to me like more of a reason why we should.

[–] Technoguyfication@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s not illegal in the US either, but you can still be sued by employers for doing it.

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

On what grounds? Surely no one with a regular job would sign a contract prohibiting them from discussing the details of their employment.

[–] wrekone@lemmyf.uk 2 points 3 months ago

And it wouldn't matter if they did. Such contracts are not legal in the US. In fact, employers can be fined simply for requesting an employee sign a contract that restricts their right to discuss salary.

[–] Technoguyfication@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You don’t need a contract. In the United States, anyone can sue anyone for anything. No laws need to have been broken nor contracts breached.

[–] c0smokram3r@midwest.social 9 points 3 months ago

Wow, did not know about this. Thanks for sharing!

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Everything on this page disgusts me: https://theworknumber.com/

[–] Zomg@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Nothing like seeing all 3 of the same posts by you in my feed 🥰

/s

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The biggest annoyance to me personally, with fediverse communities. Complete fragmentation.

Not to say I want a centralised control, but something in the middle

[–] Starbuck@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It does make establishing a critical mass of comments to make a good discussion difficult. I’ve had it once or twice where I discovered a post in one community commented and didn’t get any replies, only to discover some other discussion on the same content happened elsewhere on the fediverse that I wasn’t subscribed to.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I heard someone describe it as discussing a topic in different bars. You'll get a slightly different niche in each space. Has its pros and cons. But beats the centralization.

[–] Starbuck@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That’s a good way to think about it, actually. Thanks for sharing

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 8 points 3 months ago

I have to wonder if there is a way for clients to glom together duplicate posts across your subscribed communities into one, and if you reply to a thread in that post it passes it back to the correct discussion.

I mean, you'd still see repetitive stuff in the post's comments from your point of view, but everything would be in one place from your perspective and it would be semi-transparent, at least for the communities you subscribe to.

All the information is there, it should be doable......

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This is what you're supposed to do on the fediverse. Thank OP. Raise a bug with your frontend to add an option to dedupe your feed if it bothers you.