this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
37 points (95.1% liked)

Australia

3533 readers
63 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The article isn't entirely clear to me, but it seems that her pressure was unsuccessful.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's pretty disgusting that she's making elite swimmers speak up in her defence and get involved in her bullshit. And disappointing that they're stooping to that level.

We need our government to step in and create a situation where we don't need environmental vandals to prop up our sports.

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago

Its shaping up to be a pretty bad day for Australian swimming based on the ABC article on the Olympic team coaches comments.

We need our government to step in and create a situation where we don't need environmental vandals to prop up our sports.

Not sure i'm fully there with you on that one. Government seems to fund sports in general quite a lot, lots of other costs i'd rather them use any extra money on.

I think this is more a case of special interest associations like this need to think about the designs of their funding models if they want to avoid low levels of duress like this

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago

I think $100k would be my price. 😁

Gina, if you're reading this: I'll happily jump on all the socials and tell everyone they're being mean to you and that your portrait should no longer be on display.

Make it a Million, and I'll make a sign and protest out the front of the gallery in person.

(I don't know that it's $100k, but I expect that's roughly what is happening here. She gives swimmers money, they defend her.)

[–] Minarble@aussie.zone 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Gnugit@aussie.zone 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I prefer this slightly edited version

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I've seen this portrait so many times by now, and still not sure who she is. If she had just shrugged over it, I may never have seen it. It's the new Barbra Streisand effect on steroids

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I think the artist did a little too well and I don't really understand the purple lanyard. But it's not the kind of thing to complain about.