this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
529 points (98.5% liked)

News

23314 readers
3807 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Clarence Thomas has struck again.

To his impressive list of recent supreme court victories – abolishing the right to an abortion, eradicating affirmative action, undermining federal regulations, and more – the ultraconservative justice can now add thwarting the criminal prosecution of Donald Trump for hoarding classified documents.

On Monday, Judge Aileen Cannon astonished the judicial world by dismissing the case. She did so based on a widely discredited legal argument that the special counsel who brought the prosecution, Jack Smith, had been improperly appointed.

The argument, initially aired by the former US president’s lawyers, had received scant support in judicial circles, given that stretching back a quarter of a century it has been repeatedly rejected by the courts. But there was one jurist who encouraged Cannon to pursue such contrarian thinking: Thomas.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 84 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This man will do anything for anyone. He's a prostitute politician. Just pay him enough.

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I don't really think that's true. I think you could offer him a large sum of money to do the right thing and he still wouldn't do it. It's not even like the bribes are that huge. John Oliver tried, and I know that it was too public of course, but I still think if some rich progressive person were to offer him 10 million dollars or something to not be a huge POS he still wouldn't take the offer cause he also just happens to be a huge POS. Like the bribes are nice, but he does also just personally want to make America a christofascist hellhole.

[–] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think it was Harlan Crow(sp?) that said they give Thomas gifts NOT to influence his rulings, but because he rules in ways they appreciate. So, it's more for services rendered, less about influencing outcomes.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Which is the now-legal way to bribe politicians

That said "justice" conveniently ruled on. How surprising.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

I mean, this is the same as a sex worker saying they don't do butt stuff.

For what it's worth, I respect sex workers. I don't respect politicians that sell out of the American people, however. That might be one of the lowest things I can think of, in fact.

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How much does someone have to pay him to actually do his job?

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 14 points 4 months ago

That sum has not yet been printed

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 41 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Reminder: Both Donald and his dad Fred had policies for their slums that would have quietly denied people that look like Thomas from even renting one of their apartments.

Their employees were instructed to put a little "C" for "Colored" on their rental applications for efficient denial on the basis of race.

Yet another example that the class war presides over all the other culture wars we are encouraged to beat one another to death over to stop us from engaging our owners.

Class war is upon you, whether you would acknowledge it or play pretend its the homeless people down the street's fault like the owners want you to.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Honestly most surprised it was a "C" and not a "N".

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

"There's class warfare, all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning."

-Warren Buffet. Bragging about the situation.

He wasn't attempting to raise awareness of the issue as evidenced by his disowning his granddaughter when she did try to raise awareness of the issue by being interviewed for the documentary The 1% by one of the Johnson kids.

They won't allow us to regulate them, and have each killed hundreds of millions of us so far. I believe the phrase is believe someone when they tell you who they are, these people are unrepentant murderers, thieves, and environmental terrorists at an unprecedented level. They woke up and chose violence, we can only choose self defense at this point.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Not for a Republican, it's not!

[–] glitches_brew@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I'm starting to get tired of this canned sarcastic response that is on literally every single thread I read.

It's starting to feel defeatist. Say it enough and the joke loses its meaning.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is defeatist. Outside of dragging this PoS to the gallows nothing will done about it.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

It's a statement of fact. Whether you choose to feel angry or defeated by it is up to you.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

Its not "defeatist" when its true. Bring back the guillotines!

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The conservative injustices of the Supreme Court recently declared that anything the president does that is an "official act" (to be determined by them) cannot be prosecuted. They waited to do so until the last minute in a blatant effort to help Donald Trump, who appointed three of them, avoid prosecution. We're way past "oh, Republicans being corrupt is just a joke, ha ha." It's the fucking reality we live in now, and it should make you feel furious, not defeated.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

If they won't follow the rules, then it's time for the ammo box

Edit: if they want to remove the ballot box and soap box from the equation, the only box left is out ammo box.

Those that make peaceful reform impossible, make violent reform inevitable.

"There's class warfare, all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning."

-Warren Buffet. Bragging about the situation.

He wasn't attempting to raise awareness of the issue as evidenced by his disowning his granddaughter when she did try to raise awareness of the issue by being interviewed for the documentary The 1% by one of the Johnson kids.

They won't allow us to regulate them, and have each killed hundreds of millions of us so far. I believe the phrase is believe someone when they tell you who they are, these people are unrepentant murderers, thieves, and environmental terrorists at an unprecedented level. They woke up and chose violence, we can only choose self defense at this point.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 22 points 4 months ago

Kompromat Klarence

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Tldr judge cited his concurring opinion.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The article title is too early to be correct though. There is a good chance this decision gets judge Cannon removed from the case. Clarence may have made it much worse for Trump.

Even this supreme court is not going to allow the case to be dismissed over the appointment of a special counsel. No other judges joined Thomas's concurrence because it was clearly wrong. He might pick up Alito when the district sides with Smith on appeal and Trump sends it back to SCOTUS. But 2 to 7 doesn't give them the majority.

Smith may (and should) ask to have her removed over this and previous obvious bias/errors which I believe the district judges would also approve at this point.

All that is correct. But it's a good reminder that the point of Cannon's move is not to finally resolve the case. It has always been to delay the case until after the election. At that point, Trump will appoint an AG that will kill the case on day one.

Cannon also has one more goal - auditioning for a new job. I'm not a gambler, but if Trump wins I'd put money that the first open Supreme Court seat is hers.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

It's a GOOD THING he has NO Conflict Of Interest and is ONLY doing what's he thinks the Law is Telling Him!

[–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

Uncle tom wants to stay in the big house