this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
32 points (92.1% liked)

UK Politics

3081 readers
342 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Link. He's only posted this on Twitter for whatever reason, here's what he wrote:

Puberty Blockers. A 🧵

Children’s healthcare must always be led by evidence.

Medicine given to children must always be proven safe and effective first.

I know there’s lots of fear and anxiety.

Let me explain why this decision was taken.

Cass Review found there is not enough evidence about the long-term impact of puberty blockers for gender incongruence to know whether they are safe or not, nor which children might benefit from them.

The evidence should have been established before they were ever prescribed.

The NHS took the decision to stop the routine use of puberty blockers for gender incongruence/dysphoria in children.

They are establishing a clinical trial with NIHR to ensure the effects of puberty blockers can be safely monitored and provide the evidence we need.

The former Health Secretary issued an emergency order to extend the restriction on prescription to the private sector, which I am defending.

Puberty blockers have been used to delay puberty in children and young people who start puberty much too early.

Use in those cases has been extensively tested (a very different indication from use in gender dysphoria) and has met strict safety requirements.

This is because the puberty blockers are suppressing hormone levels that are abnormally high for the age of the child.

This is different to stopping the normal surge of hormones that occur in puberty. This affects children’s psychological and brain development.

We don’t yet know the risks of stopping pubertal hormones at this critical life stage.

That is the basis upon which I am making decisions.

I am treading cautiously in this area because the safety of children must come first.

Some of the public statements being made are highly irresponsible and could put vulnerable young people at risk.

I know there’s lots of fear and anxiety. I am determined to improve the quality of, and access to, care for trans people.

I hope this thread provides some context for the caution and care I am taking when it comes to this vulnerable group of young people.

The decisions I am taking will always be based on evidence, rather than politics or political pressure.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The NHS took the decision to stop the routine use of puberty blockers for gender incongruence/dysphoria in children.

This decision has been linked to the suicide of 16 people. But sure child safety must come first.

Donate to the Good Law Project who are currently challenging this barbarism in the courts.

[–] audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I live in the States in a state that banned gender affirming care for minors.

One exchange I’ll never forget is a state senator saying “we have to ban these because we don’t know what the long term side effects might be”, to which the only queer senator we have responded “but we are well aware of the long term side effects of suicide”

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah wow can you imagine if a kid went through puberty with the wrong hormones? Therefore, let's never ask which ones are the right ones.

I am long past pretending conservatives give a shit if their lies make sense. But god damn, do I wish these people cared what words mean.

[–] TotallyNotSpez@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fuck the NHS and thank you for the link.

I'm doing my part.

[–] RubberDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Is it the NHS pushing for this or just the politicians?

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's muddy. Badenoch has bragged about putting 'gender critical' people into key positions, and that was the reason the Cass Review was able to happen. But the NHS did advise the government against the ban.

[–] TotallyNotSpez@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago
[–] flamingmongoose@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Then TALK to trans people, not just about them.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

LISTEN to trans people. Not to ~~terfs~~ farts.

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago

Streeting is a Tory with a red rosette. From the right-wing Blairite faction (Progress) and one of the most disloyal and unprofessional politicians when Corbyn was leader.

Expectations of better in this guy would be misplaced.

[–] mecfs@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

“I know there is lots of fear and anxiety”

This is classic psychologising. Branding others concerns as “anxiety” is not only medically false, but is used in order to belittle those criticising.

If you genuinely care about trans people then Streeting, how are you going to prevent the increased suicidality this decision will surely cause?

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 7 points 4 months ago

Trans kids will die for this transphobic hysteria and ideology. What is going to be done to stop kids taking their own lives as a result of care being denied to them? Sweet fuck all, I assume.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

can't wait til the labour government collapses tbh. and people called me daft for saying i was less safe under a labour government.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 2 points 4 months ago

In fairness the tories did this first, labour is just upholding it (which is despicable)

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I know I'm going to get downvoted to fuck, but, good.

Children aren't allowed to drink, smoke, get a piercing or tattoo etc etc. So why are we allowing them to make changes to their bodies in regards to transitioning that are not fully reversible? Once they're 18, they're legally an adult and fully responsible for the choices they make.

[–] cook_pass_babtridge@feddit.uk 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

On the flipside of this: adolescence is an extremely important part of life where we make thousands of decisions that impact the whole rest of our lives. We sit exams that determine whether or not we do higher education, and therefore what opportunities we have later in life. Teenagers can get arrested and thrown in jail, or just excluded from schools and denied the essential education that they need in later life. There are far more children in jail than are on puberty blockers. The idea that individual agency starts at 18 is a myth.

And I don't really agree with the comparison with alcohol and smoking. Puberty blockers aren't an indulgence or vice - for a teenager going through gender dysphoria they can be the line between life and death. Plus, let's face it - lots of us are drinking and smoking a few years before 18.

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I agree that the age of 18 is arbitrary, but we as a society do draw the line at a point where we say whether someone is old enough to be considered an adult.

I wasn't trying to say that puberty blockers or transitioning is a vice, I was trying to make the implication that the mind is still developing at these times and if we consider that to be true then maybe we should be holding off on a decision that will significantly impact them for the rest of their lives.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 3 points 4 months ago

This can be said of most medical interventions, all you're doing is singling out trans healthcare.

[–] wren@feddit.uk 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

hormone blockers are already used safely and legally all the time by cis children who experience puberty too early. it gives them longer to be a child and not stress about the impacts of puberty

trans kids just want almost the same thing - to be able to exist with bodily autonomy. if it's fine for cis kids, it should be fine for trans kids too

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's not the same. Puberty blockers used for premature puberty just hold off what will happen until it's supposed to. Blocking puberty during the time you're meant to be having it is not considered to be fully reversible according to the NHS.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 3 points 4 months ago

it is not considered to be fully reversible according to the NHS.

That is an over statement of what the NHS says. They claim it is not proven to be 100% reversible. A very very different statement.

No actual harm has been proven. Just cases that the cause is not yet clear.