this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

RetroGaming

19250 readers
286 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChanSecodina@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It was the style at the time! Lots of CD players had flip up tops, as did the Sega Saturn. I assume it was because the slide out tray mechanism was more expensive and also more fragile.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Also causes the anxiety of scratching disks while using it.

[–] ChanSecodina@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

For a real trip check out this Japanese laptop:

I love this tech aesthetic. 90s Japanese tech is just fun to look at.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

A friend of mine had one of those. It was super sleek to look at, but the flip top doubling as a wrist rest turned it into a CD grinder after a few years.

[–] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Wait till you see smart phones

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You need a CD flap, and that's the biggest visible feature of the console, so best to make it the centrepiece, and design around it. And CDs are circular so yeah, let's follow that in the design.

You need two buttons, one for power and one for open. Symmetry is always appealing, so make them symmetrical and balanced on both sides.

Very much an example of "form follows function"

[–] tuckerm@supermeter.social 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This post made me realize just how few consoles had a CD flap. Is it just the Playstation, Dreamcast, Saturn, and Gamecube? Kind of weird how that was the default for CD players pretty much forever, but not many consoles went with that. PS2, Xbox, and everything after those had some kind of tray or slot. Maybe it was because they could visually stand apart from their competitors more that way.

[–] SlothMama@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

For some perspective, CD trays, like the PS2 and Xbox had, that retracted mechanically were viewed as sleek and futuristic, and that's why slot loaders like the Wii and PS3 gained traction too.

It was an aesthetic choice, like the move from green LEDs to blue, though that has historic significant as blue LEDs are a relatively recent invention as the were incredibly difficult to figure out, so blue LEDs were seen as futuristic and opulent and used in everything consumer electronics for a while.

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The original Xbox had a tray because it was basically a PC, and had a standard IDE CD-ROM with some minor changes. They weren't standing apart, they were following the new standard of the time, PCs, and it was probably more to do with cost savings by using common parts. They also had a standard IDE HDD. Even their weird proprietary controller port they used on the original Xbox is just USB! Its the same wires, they just screwed up the pinout. you can replace one of those weird controller ports with a normal female USB and then plug all sorts of USB devices into the Xbox and they just work.

I only single out the Xbox because I've taken them apart, I imagine the PS2 is similar. At least PS2 didn't intentionally mess up their USB ports.

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

What about GameCube? Flip top with the same 2 buttons

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It’s almost like they were designed around something round… I call it the data-wheel!

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not really. And that's a PSX, the PSOne was smaller and had round edges.

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

PS1 =/= PSOne and most people know the difference, but yes most enthusiasts say PSX to avoid confusion

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's a PS1, the redesign was PSOne. PSX was a PS2+DVR.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No, it has been originally named PSX long before the PS2 was even a thought.

[–] Nilz@sopuli.xyz 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It was never officially named PSX, but it was called that way by people for some reason. I guess to differentiate the fat and slim versions.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

The name spread at the time even before the release of the console, so everyone called it that, even websites listed it as PSX. The slim PSOne version came much later, arguably even too late to be of any significance for anyone or anything.

[–] SlothMama@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Literally untrue I promise, even worse, you're extra wrong because the PSX is actually the name of a Japanese specific set top entertainment box that also played PS2 games and was the introduction of the XMB ( Cross Media Bar ) interface that the PSP and PS3 both used.

The small PlayStation did have the official designation of PSOne though.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Are you some infantile bot or why do you keep repeating what's already been addressed? lol It was PSX, everyone called it PSX, even websites called it PSX. I know because I had one. You can even still see in the wiki page that its codename was PSX.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

Confusingly (and as I discovered in this thread) the name "PSX" is both the release name for the ps2/recorder and the code name for the original PlayStation.

The PlayStation (abbreviated as PS, commonly known as the PS1/PS one or its codename PSX)

Not to be confused with PSX (digital video recorder) or PlayStation Experience.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_(console)

So technically you're both right and both wrong!