this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
206 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19089 readers
5653 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 93 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wow, republicans losing Texas, that would be a hell of a win if Colin could pull it off.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 59 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Texas is far more politically complicated than most Americans realize. Gains in Texas are proportionate to politicians running on platforms that matter to Texans. Hopefully if Cruz gets voted put the Democrats learn a valuable lesson about how to win in Texas. My concern is they'll take all the wrong lessons and take the win to mean it's time to double down on the old losing strategies.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago (3 children)

As a leftist in Louisiana, it’s sometimes important to remind people that there were more Trump voters in California than Texas.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 19 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] Whirlygirl9@kbin.melroy.org 15 points 4 months ago

If that was the whole story, I would agree with you...but there has been a 30-year campaign of voter suppression, gerrymandering, and general fuckery that causes that number to be so low. In the 2020 election at the height of covid, Greg "piss baby" Abbott limited ballot drop-off locations to one. In smaller, traditionally more republican counties this wasn't as bad for them...but they did this for Harris County... a very blue county with millions of residents. Texas doesn't have drop-off boxes for absentee ballots, as some states do. Instead, to drop off a mail-in ballot in person at any location, voters must present an approved form of ID to a poll worker, and voters can't turn in any one else's ballot... sick gramma? fuck you drag her here to drop that shit off. Did they sue? you bet they did. did they lose? you bet they did because Texas has been fucked by the right for the last 30 years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hime0321@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Except that our voting system makes that mostly irrelevant. California still had all their electors vote for Biden. Plus California has 10 million more people so that makes sense too.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Yep. The best part of the U.S. constitution is the amendments. We should probably all spend some time thinking about that. Is our constitution good? The edits and polite suggestions are. The main bits are outdated, though, and were written by eloquent people who had the same knowledge of 2024 as we have for the year 2350.

[–] MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

California has more Republicans than any other state.

Because we’re a big state.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

Statements like theirs are basically those "insightful" maps showing [insert trend here] by location that are essentially just population density maps.

[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

I mean sort of. But also I've seen people that disagree with everything Republicans and Republican candidates say, say with a straight face "at least I didn't vote for a Democrat" so it's also not that complicated at the same time.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I feel like Beto could've pulled it off if he'd ceded the gun issue. Of course it's a mess but the NRA has convinced people that school shootings need to be a part of life for freedoms or whatever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Biggest thing is that Texas has horribly low voter turnout. The state could easily go purple if left leaning people would actually show up and vote.

[–] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Biden was only behind Trump by 600,000 votes in 2020. Biden actually received more votes in TX than NY, but we still need better voter registration and turnout rates.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 87 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I will believe it when I see it. This asshole is always behind in polls but somehow manages to pull +5 to +10 advantage at the last moment. Do not believe in any of these “news”

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 5 points 4 months ago

I'm 25 so I have only been paying attention to elections for a handful of years now, but it seems like polls are something you can almost completely ignore in American politics, they don't necessarily seem based in reality.

[–] shyguyblue@lemmy.world 58 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run 30 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Bad news for Cruz is good news for Colin Allred, the country, and the world.

[–] Davidchan@lemmynsfw.com 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

As long as Allred isn't dumb enough to repeatedly say he will ban all guns multiple times while campaigning in the state with the highest level of gun ownership in the union he might just win.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Really needs to focus on the social issues Texans care about. Texans are generally very in favor of public welfare programs and environmental protections. They just don't tend to vote democrat because they do also tend to be pretty universally pro-life (not great) and pro-gun (my position on this has shifted slightly, my current stance is I don't agree with either political party's positioning) and the Democrats they've run have fallen into the Republican trap of focusing on the wedge issues the republicans choose to focus on. I cannot emphasize this enough: if the republicans are making a big stink about something, its a distraction for the thing they're ACTUALLY interested in. Are you a Democrat who wants to win in Texas? Don't step out putting gun rights and abortion front and center. You will lose. No matter how appealing you are to a Texan, you're not as appealing as the people who've been siphoning up votes with these as their only potions. A better plan is to talk about how you're gonna bolster social welfare for women and infants and how you're going to reduce inflation and interest rates.

God its been so frustrating watching the Democrats dash themselves on the Beto O'Rourke rocks over and over. 1) Beto sucks, in general 2) he extra special bonus sucks for running in Texas

[–] Davidchan@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

My point was Beto had a real shot at unseating Cruz and he fucked it all by repeatedly going on about how he wants to ban guns and never taking the chance to walk it back. You want gun control thats fine, but for the love of god do not campaign on it.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago

For sure. But I saw a ton of non Texas democrats interpreting his loss as that there was no way a Democrat could ever win in Texas when it was like... "Dude, he was really close while actively running a bad campaign for the state he was running in. Stop trying to court moderate Republicans and start picking up the black and gay voters out there (who in Texas are gun owners, so maybe don't campaign on guns)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] paf0@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Calling Ted Cruz "Rafael" is incredibly lazy. The man now licks The Donald's boots after calling his wife ugly and left Texas to hide in Mexico during a disaster. There is so much more material.

[–] ClanOfTheOcho@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

AbanTEDment Cruz? I'm not very good at this game, but it's fun.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Cancun Cruz was really popular

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Like how he liked incest porn on 9/11.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunzu@kbin.run 6 points 4 months ago

Why the quotes... That is his name!

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 44 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Fuck Raphael "Ted" "my wife is ugly and incapable of taking care of our children without me supervising" Cruz.

[–] A_Filthy_Weeaboo@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Are you talking about the Raphel "Ted" who abandoned his constituents during a state disaster to go on a tropical vacation?!

[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

The great senator from Cancun? There's another storm coming our way, I assume the bags are packed.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Rafael* Cruz.

He's not Italian. He is Latino*. A self-hating one. I'm embarrassed for him.

*You could make a case indicating that Italians have Latin roots, but you know what I mean.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I spell shit wrong because I'm a drunk. Whoever reads this, listen to this person and not me.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don't sell yourself short. You aren't just a drunk, you're the Texas drunk!

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Naw, the Texas Drunk is a buddy of mine. He's out east these days but his heart and his drinking problem are here with us.

I'm definitely a problem drinker (I don't recommend it, self medication is a bitch) but I've seen that guy do two weeks straight of staying drunk morning to night on vacation. We went camping at the beach and at 7 am I heard the csshh of a beer opening after being up most of the night drinking. He's been doing that since 1998. If he's not doing something that needs sobriety he's tanked.

One of the best guys I know. I'm just a drunk and I never want that other title. Too much work. I'm only tanked a couple of nights a week most of the time.

[–] Bahalex@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Latino? Isn't he Canadian?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ted Cruz may not have as big a lead as he would have been hoping for in the race for his Texas Senate seat, according to a poll.

A Manhattan Institute survey of 600 likely voters in Texas found that Cruz has a 3 point lead (46 percent to 43 percent) over his Democratic rival, rep. Colin Allred. This margin is down from a double-digit lead the incumbent Republican has enjoyed in previous Texas senate surveys.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Makes me want to buy some campaign signs...

"Oust RINO Ted Cruz, vote All-Red for senate this November!"

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Ted" Cruz? You mean the guy who was born out of the county, who's had gender-affirming care, and who refuses to use the name his parents gave him when he was born? That "Ted" Cruz?

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I forget the details in Cruz's case (maybe the person who commented will fill in those), but it's not anything like you're thinking. "Gender affirming care" can mean any kind of medical treatment/care that is for the purpose of making you feel more like your gender identity. e.g. a man getting hair plugs to look more manly or taking hormone supplements to grow out his beard, etc.

Again, I forget what the case is for Cruz, but it was something routine that technically falls under "gender affirming care" that he and his ilk are constantly demonizing. Just a fun little way to call him a hypocrite.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

but it’s not anything like you’re thinking.

It probably is.

“Gender affirming care” can mean any kind of medical treatment/care that is for the purpose of making you feel more like your gender identity. e.g. getting hair plugs to look more manly, taking hormone supplements to grow out your beard, etc

Yep, and I believe that more gender affirming care procedures are performed on cisgender persons the transgender persons.

Edit: I managed to leave out a bunch of words the first time.

Again, I forget what the case is for Cruz, but it was something routine that technically falls under “gender affirming care” that he and his ilk are constantly demonizing.

And technically true is the best scenario for throwing in their faces! 😆 Especially when it's applying their stupid laws to them in a "no not like that" way.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 2 points 4 months ago

Iirc, he had a hair transplant, and at one point he was also dying his hair.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I love duplicitous signage!

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Good. Go die in obscurity, you rat-faced traitoristic butthole nodule.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Obligatory: when he was at Princeton, there was a tradition where during the first snowfall of the year, the sophomores would make a lap around their dorm naked. Somehow, Ted Cruz took a wrong turn and instead of waiting for him, everyone locked him out of the dorm.

[–] TheLameSauce@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I heard he pees his pants because he likes the warm feeling on his legs.

[–] Brokkr@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Lizards are cold blooded though, would their pee be warm?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

It's okay he'll be in Cancun soon enough.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Tedcruzforhumanpresident.com

load more comments
view more: next ›