Fish for interactive shell. “It depends” for scripting, but usually ends up Bash since it is the NixOS default.
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
131 points (97.1% liked)
Linux
48193 readers
1551 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I've recently migrated to nushell, I don't straight up recommend it because it's not POSIX compliant, so unless you're already familiar with some other she'll I would not use it.
That being said, it's an awesome shell if you deal with structured data constantly, and that's something I do quite often so for me it's a great tool.
Just looking at it briefly it looks a lot like PowerShell, any reason to use it over PowerShell?
Never used PowerShell, so I didn't know that it was available for Linux nor open source, since from a quick search both of them seem to be true I guess there's no real reason since both are described very similarly.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Bash is my favourite one, second to it being Fish
Bash, zshell, BusyBox....you don't really need anything else
Nushell
oksh
I use mainly fish and occasionally nushell.
Bash. By default it might seem less featureful than zsh.. but bash is a lot more powerful and extensible than some give it credit for. It might be more complex to set it up the way you like it, but once you do it, that configuration can be ported over wherever bash exists (ie. almost everywhere).
Zsh with powerlevel10k + a few plugins
I have been enjoying fish a lot over the last few months, but I generally try to use Bash, it makes cross-*NIX administration that much easier.
zsh because I've been using it since college and I don't like change
Bash, just because everything else already uses it. That and bashisms have infected nearly all of my scripts as I clumsily bump into the limitations of POSIX string manipulation.
I have found some very fun things with sed branching patterns as a result of these limitations though...
https://www.gnu.org/software/sed/manual/html_node/Branching-and-flow-control.html
zsh with grml config because I'm too lazy to make my own config.
Bash is my login shell, but I have fish set as the default shell for alacritty
Bash as it is what I'm most familiar with. Having an eye out on the https://amber-lang.com/ that compiles to bash for future scripting purposes.
xterm+zsh
PowerShell, with zsh being a close second
Feeling risky today, eh? Mind sharing the reasoning behind your extravagant choice?
load more comments
(1 replies)
POSIX on servers, thinking of switching to POSIX on desktop but that's a bit awkward
PowerShell, because of autocomplete and shift+arrows select.
I often end up in ps because I'm more familiar with it. But only if I have to do some scripting or so.
xterm, because shortcut keys do what they are supposed to.
Edit:
Bash because it's default.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Microsoft copilot
Fish & dash.