this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
72 points (80.0% liked)

Cool Guides

4655 readers
3 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Muscar@discuss.online 38 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This feels just as likely to be the ramblings of a crazy person as an actual map of the human brain.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's real, but cobbled together from multiple sources. For instance we haven't referred to the "reticular activating system" since maybe the 1980s? They call it the "reticular arousal system" which is either a neologism or maybe a reactivation of the term in the literature. I haven't been active in the area in over a decade.

I'll note that this broadly accurate on a macro level, but the details really matter. There are different cortical layers for instance and cell types and the nature of the signal processing differs by layer. So saying "X connects to Y" is useful in some sense, but provides much less information than you might imagine.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I also am curous about the "fear of god." Pathway. It's right next to anxiety.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well shouldn't it be? lol.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Did you find it? The map is one massive shitpost.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

There is actual work on that by a guy named Michael Persinger using transcranial magnetic induction. He claimed to have found a region where stimulation produced a sense of the presence/fear of God. Persinger was a hack on many levels. He used a motorcycle helmet with holes drilled in it for the induction mount. Lete see if I can find a paper...

Well never mind. The kook died a few years ago. https://www.sudbury.com/local-news/breaking-laurentian-professor-michael-persinger-most-famous-for-his-god-helmet-passes-away-1016204

He also has a wikipedia page lol. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_helmet

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Damn. The lengths the religious go through just to bullshit the existance of god.

[–] xpinchx@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you look at the source (link on the right edge) it's a page with religious ramblings on how this disproves evolution because our nervous system is set up like a computer or microchip. Bibles quotes and all.

The chart is a great testament to how complicated our biology is and not much else.

[–] bbuez@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Sure your brain doesn't have a Honeywell Military Internal Navigation System in it?

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 30 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is part of my actual area of expertise. They mis-labeled the locus coeruleus as being "stress". Arousal would be more correct. They also missed Barrington's Nucleus right next to it which controls micturition. Absolute trash.

[–] h3mlocke@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago
[–] huginn@feddit.it 10 points 5 months ago

Note: vastly undersells the complexity.

For example the neurotransmitters listed are by no means all of the transmitters. We're still figuring out how many there are but the number is definitely more than 100.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

This feels like a joke

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is a cool guide to a descent into schizophrenic paranoia. I am genuinely concerned for the mental health of whoever made this.

[–] eldesgraciado@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

Thanks for making it completely unintelligible

[–] Towerofpain11@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

If you squint it looks like the start of r/place.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Obviously intelligent design.

[–] Muscar@discuss.online 3 points 5 months ago

You forgot this: /s

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 3 points 5 months ago

And here I am struggling with Visio, trying to make illustrations of relatively simple networks.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

And here I thought I didn’t understand computer chip engineering designs (or whatever they’re called).

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago

Its literally just random shit strewn across the image? Why is this even here?