this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
144 points (96.8% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6597 readers
454 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Dafuq is a manpad? Is that for when your asshole is bleeding?

[–] F04118F@feddit.nl 17 points 6 months ago

MAN-Portable Air Defense (System). Basically a tube with optics that you can use to fire an anti-air missile from your shoulder. Stinger and Strela are some examples

[–] einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

source for the information in the title: i made it up, or did i?

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

The sensor is just a 128x96 monochrome camera and it's fairly trivial to programmatically determine where IR lights are at in the frame. The processor just needs to scan through 12,288 pixels, find the center of a cluster of bright pixels and return coordinate. It's not a complex operation, but the devil is in the details: I suspect you would still need to overclock the hell out of it to process over 60fps. Manpads are fast with the Stinger clocking in at about mach 2. As the missile gets closer to the target, it wouldn't take much of a delay to screw things up.

So sure, if you spend the cash on a quality glass, you could do a ton with that sensor. It's probably years ahead of what was on the original Stinger, actually.

It might work, but the use-cases are extremely far apart here.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Also the accelerometer only goes to some 3.4 G which you get really easily.

[–] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

3.4 G.

Not great. Not terrible.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I had a whole paragraph about that, but deleted it. The question focused on the IR sensor and processor so that put many other components out of scope.

Consumer grade MEMS sensors would probably just implode at those forces, but I can't really speak to that.

Edit: While I was thinking more about this, it makes complete sense that any circuits would be analog, especially for that time period. With military hardware, durability and reliability is paramount**, so a stinger probably would use something way less complicated than a camera. I don't know for certain, but that is most of the magic of military tech in general.

** lol. I actually said that. Replace "reliability" with "survivability" and that sounds cooler.

IR homing sensors before the digital age where a piece of analog signalpath art. Its mostly rotating a singular ir sensor in 45degree and then mapping the inputs rotation compensated to the control surfaces. Simple at core but cant tell the difference between a jet exhaust, the sun, or a flare.

Modern version are boring is a High resolution ir cam and some blackmagic AI picking targets apart from flares.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

you don't need to check everything. let's say that spot is 10px wide, then you can check every 8th pixel meaning now you only need to check 16x12 px. then, maximum is gotta be in one of these 8x8 squares around shiny pixel, so you can sample middle of each to find out where it might be. then, scan that 8x8 square pixel by pixel to find maximum

this might be reason for not using absurdly good optics

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ok, that is smart. That would probably get the logic fast enough to keep up with the sensor "refresh rate" when pixel values are buffered from each sensor pixel. (My knowledge of digital camera sensors is a bit primitive. I read (or watched?) something a few months ago about image tearing caused by sensor scanning. This might matter, to a small degree? Dunno.)

My guess was that the lenses would be for filtering through whatever IR band is important and it's those coatings that are the quality bit: https://www.edmundoptics.com/c/ir-lenses/655/

I am wondering if you can get lenses crafted specifically for jet engine IR signatures. If so, that would really boost the capabilities of any sensor...

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago

that's for wii, imaging sensor in a missile will be much more complex and probably includes UV sensor as well (you're not tracking a blob, but shape)

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago

idk about manpads, but non-imaging sidewinders had reticle spinning at 100-125Hz. performance required does not imply some alien technology