this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31982 readers
397 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(In the case that someone in Lemmy still use Google)

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What to use for search engine. Even ddg is not giving reliable results.

[–] PoorPocketsMcNewHold@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If you believe Google is the most reliable, you can still use it in a private way via :

  • Startpage

Startpage is a private search engine known for serving Google and Bing search results. One of Startpage's unique features is the Anonymous View, which puts forth efforts to standardize user activity to make it more difficult to be uniquely identified. The feature can be useful for hiding some network and browser properties.

https://www.startpage.com/

SearXNG is an open-source, self-hostable, metasearch engine, aggregating the results of other search engines while not storing any information itself.

There's plenty of public instances too https://searx.space/

Get Google search results, but without any ads, JavaScript, AMP links, cookies, or IP address tracking. Easily deployable in one click as a Docker app, and customizable with a single config file.

Couple of public instances too. Basically SearxNG with ONLY google as a source. https://github.com/benbusby/whoogle-search#public-instances

[–] squeakycat@lemmy.ml 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've been happy with Kagi. It's for-pay but it's quality to me.

[–] li10@feddit.uk 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It’s just a bit too expensive imo.

[–] Rexios@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

For something I use constantly every day $10 is nothing

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

but for something you never use $10 is quite a lot.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

$5/mo. If that's too pricey deal with shit 🤷‍♂️.

[–] PirateMike94@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Be nice, this isn't the app next door.

[–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I…. Don’t really get why they think this is better. Google search was good…. Other companies can copy AI technology anyway. AI is really just predicting words and wasn’t designed for search, but their old algorithm was.

Whyyyyyy

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Google hasn't understood the internet for a long time. They created an excellent search algorithm by treating the internet as a single information system that warranted analysis and indexing for convenient traversal.

These days that's not... Something they're interested in anymore. The goal is to collect user data for targeting advertising and resale. Their core product is still the search bar, sure, but that's just a hook to reel you in. They'll attach whatever buzzword to it it takes to keep it in the zeitgeist. "Ai" is hot right now so that's the buzzword.

I don't get the impression technical competency is something Google values anymore...

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There's been some former Google employees with stories about being told by the ad team to scrap mostly completed projects that increased search functionality because in testing it negatively impacted impressions on the "sponsored" search results.

That really says all you need to know.

Beyond that, Google is notorious for having terrible metrics for promotions. It highly incentivises creating new projects and disincentivises maintaining or improving existing systems.

[–] Cube6392@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago

One of my favorite articles about that last part is "I am not a maker"