this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
277 points (98.3% liked)

Memes

8314 readers
1606 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] reverendsteveii@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

If the top makes you feel like Soyjack instead of Chad that's on you. There's no freedom like insignificance.

[–] fogetaboutit@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Virgin Self Deprecation vs Chad Self Confidence

[–] niktemadur@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Virgin Fake Existentialist vs Chad True Existentialist

[–] query@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One of the popular alternatives is that God created the entire universe, a hundred billion stars with trillions of other celestial bodies in our galaxy, multiplied across hundreds of billions of galaxies or more, and then on this rocky planet, added water, magnetosphere, atmosphere, millions of species, dumped a lot of fossils in the ground, killed his son, and said believe in him and you'll be able to go to church forever.

At least the Mormons made a note of other planets existing, but still. I prefer to think of what else might be out there.

[–] reverendsteveii@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

Another popular theory is that God created the entire universe, and that has made a lot of people very angry and is widely regarded as a Bad Move.

[–] SCmSTR@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Religion is just slow to adapt to uh, reality.

The Church of latter Day saints is just newer by a thousand or so years.

[–] niktemadur@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Religion that worships The God Of The Desert is still stuck in the Middle Eastern desert five thousand years ago, when science was non-existent and even writing/reading was a rare thing, as baffling to most people then as the inner workings of AI are to us now.

The principles and values (some sensible, some nonsensical and dangerous in the present world) of people living in the desert five thousand years ago are still being hammered into our minds as children by those who had it hammered to them as children also. Some break free of this conditioning in view of modern evidence, some do it partially, some don't do it at all.

[–] SCmSTR@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think this is unique to any religion.

Religion is all inherently centered around trust in falsehoods. They mix it with normal philosophy, But due to the way our brains and imaginations work in relation to fear and tribal survival instincts, they get jumbled up, and the philosophy stagnates the same way the belief in imagined things does.

In other words, I view all religions as literal cult practices of irrationality and fear. Varying levels, for sure, but it's the defining trait of religion.

That being said, as long as those people practice modern respect for others' autonomous free wills, I don't have a problem with them. I just also think that the defining trait of religion is conducive to not doing that.

[–] basdiljhs@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Carl Sagan ftw

[–] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It don't matter. None of this matters.

[–] datadrako@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

Yeah, ain't it liberating?

[–] Ignacio@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

So, does it antimatter?

[–] dedale@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It kind of matters to me.

[–] SCmSTR@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Just say smith.

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Is the difference in perspective whether one is a teenager who just read Watchmen for the first time? Because it kinda sounds like it.

[–] Johanno@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We are insignificant on a cosmic scale. But we aren't on a Global scale!

All of you matter. (And are matter)

[–] Entropywins@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As far as I can tell I'd argue we are quite significant on the cosmic scale also.

[–] Johanno@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Depends on what context. Matter wise not.

Technology on the other hand we can only tell that several Millionens years ago nobody else had sth. Measurable like we do now

[–] SCmSTR@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SCmSTR@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Holy fuck voice-to-text...

¿Por Qué No Los Dos?

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I kinda want to start saying "pork again noodles does" to people.

[–] csolisr@communities.azkware.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Statistically speaking, human society should not exist... way too many random coincidences required simultaneously for intelligent life to even be possible... and that's why the very laws of physics are fighting slowly but surely to ensure that we will eventually cease existing without a trace

[–] jcg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I believe we experience this timeline because it's the only timeline that can experience anything. All those other timelines where some shit didn't go right don't have human beings capable of experience, so of course we aren't there. I guess what I'm saying is... We are inevitable

load more comments
view more: next ›