The admins have the ability to and reserve the right to appoint a new head mod to any community. We actually do it semi often on Lemmy.ml, you can request to become the mod of a community if it has no mods, or all the mods have been inactive for several months.
Asklemmy
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
Maybe I am wrong here but I think it's not a big deal. If people can't joint a new sub if one crashes they weren't very involved anyways so it's mostly about imagined reach that's lost.
Also I am not sure there's a good technological solution for this problem.
If an instance goes down, then pretty all much all data on that server will not be accessible. So the communities, posts and users on that instance will be gone.
Maybe lemmy can implement something similar to the matrix protocol.
Matrix is really a decentralised conversation store rather than a messaging protocol. When you send a message in Matrix, it is replicated over all the servers whose users are participating in a given conversation - similarly to how commits are replicated between Git repositories. There is no single point of control or failure in a Matrix conversation which spans multiple servers:
If an instance goes down, then pretty all much all data on that server will not be accessible.
Also wanna add, that if any servers have been federating with communities that live on a dead server, they will still have a backup of all those pushed posts and comments ( which starts happening immediately after one person subscribes to that remote community).
That would dramatically increase server resources necessary though
yep that is a problem.
GNU Social has proposed a mechanism for sharing a group between multiple instances: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-8485-unbound-actor/2200
But as I understand it, it assumes such a group wouldn't have moderators at all
I think the only solution really is probably to self host. Or, for multiple instances to have duplicate instances and to cross post on all the communities. You already see this happening, especially with COVID communities across Lemmy and Lotide, but also with news and tech communities I think
Some more relevant discussion: https://lemmy.ml/post/161629
title of that post :
"Thoughts on r/antiwork drama and implications for Lemmy" by Yogthos
2022-01-26 /29 comments so far
mods are f@gs
ha ha ha !
you miss one "@" !