Asklemmy

43777 readers

2316 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Does Lemmy have a way to counteract a mod taking down a whole community? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by lemmy_check_that@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

After seeing what happend on r/antiwork over at Reddit. Does Lemmy have a way to prevent somthing similar, like could another instance decide to preserve a deleted community and not have a single point of failure?

The same question can be asked if an instance suddenly closes down, can other instances keep the communities alive?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] the_tech_beast@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

If an instance goes down, then pretty all much all data on that server will not be accessible. So the communities, posts and users on that instance will be gone.

Maybe lemmy can implement something similar to the matrix protocol.

Matrix is really a decentralised conversation store rather than a messaging protocol. When you send a message in Matrix, it is replicated over all the servers whose users are participating in a given conversation - similarly to how commits are replicated between Git repositories. There is no single point of control or failure in a Matrix conversation which spans multiple servers:

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

If an instance goes down, then pretty all much all data on that server will not be accessible.

Also wanna add, that if any servers have been federating with communities that live on a dead server, they will still have a backup of all those pushed posts and comments ( which starts happening immediately after one person subscribes to that remote community).

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That would dramatically increase server resources necessary though

[–] the_tech_beast@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

yep that is a problem.

[–] vpzom@narwhal.city 1 points 2 years ago

GNU Social has proposed a mechanism for sharing a group between multiple instances: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-8485-unbound-actor/2200

But as I understand it, it assumes such a group wouldn't have moderators at all