this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
974 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

High school nerds pay attention. This is how you can make some money and have an excuse to talk to the hot girls…by installing a vpn on their phones so they can still have their tik tok.

Get one popular girls phone set up and every girl in the school will be hitting you up within a week.

[–] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Highschooler here, everyone already uses vpn's to bypass the school firewall to view blocked sites and stuff while on school wifi.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 8 months ago

The kids are gonna be alright

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

And why do you assume everyone including hot girls & popular girls aren't already capable of installing their own VPNs? Unless of course you mean the high school nerd is going to pay for our VPN service, then come on over!

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I’m sure some do. I haven’t talked to many high school girls lately.

If this goes through and this happened when I was in school…that’d be a once in a lifetime opportunity. I’d probably never even think of it then. I’d probably luck into it by telling the rest of the nerd table at lunch, jock overheard, sell him my services, and then word of mouth from there.

That happening now…probably be the inspiration for the gen Z’s “American Pie”. Or “Superbad”.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

Are you kidding? There isn’t a phone owning high schooler that doesn’t know how to vpn past their high school’s nanny software. You’re out of touch.

[–] escaped_cruzader@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

aren’t already capable

Anyone who can read and follow directions is capable

Most people can't install a VPN, including hot or cold girls

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Most people can’t install a VPN,

My guy, do YOU know how to set up a VPN?

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And the cycle of infantalizing women continues...

[–] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy does draw a certain crowd unfortunately.

[–] bluemite@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

That's mainly the internet, not just Lemmy

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Whatever Tiktok is doing, the correct response is to write enforcable laws to prevent ANY company from doing what Tiktok is doing.

This is bad governance.

[–] Devccoon@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That's what they did. The "correct response" is described in the article as the law 50/50 signed here.

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Did you read the article? The bill bans tiktok for being foreign. There is nothing in this article that describes a bill that outlaws any practices, conventions, or actions that tiktok has done.

Being afraid of foreigners for being foreign is not effective regulation.

[–] Trantarius@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The bill itself says, more or less, "any foreign adversary controlled app is banned. Also, TikTok is a foreign adversary controlled app". So it doesn't apply exclusively to TikTok, but it does explicitly include them.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Interesting wording there, "foreign adversary controlled", goes a long way to protect all the companies that are based in tax havens, or controlled by foreign allies, like Saudi Arabia or Israel

[–] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In a democracy one of the very most important choices that must be made by citizens is what other nations are considered allies or an enemies.

The funny thing is that US citizens have absolutely zero control over who the government decides is our enemy or ally. That aspect of government is entirely partitioned off as separate from the “democracy”, as if the foreign policy element of our government was itself a foreign nation we have no control over.

While we are on the topic, fuck the government of Saudi Arabia and Israel, both governments are horrendously violent.

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've read this comment over 10 times now and I have no idea what the words "the law 50/50 signed here" means, so I can't be sure I understand the argument you are trying to make. My best guess is that you are using circular logic to suggest that every democratically decided upon decision is always the right decision, which is nonsense because democracy is demonstrably fallible.

[–] Devccoon@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My point might be a little Covid brain fogged but I'm just pointing out that they did exactly what the guy asked for, if they bothered to click past the title which makes it sound like a targeted "ban Tiktok" law.

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I am not a guy. I read the entire article before commenting. The law did not do what I asked for. You would know if you read my comment all the way through.

[–] Devccoon@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think you're making assumptions that I can read into what exactly you find wrong with Tiktok. That context is not there in the original comment.

[–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Being chinese by definition can't effect any company. There is enough context.

[–] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

So NSA backdoors are mandatory but Chinese ones are bad.

[–] redfox@infosec.pub 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Yes. 🤷

Nobody wants to be spied on by their perceived enemies. Also, how do you expect us to maintain an appropriate level of hypocrisy if we don't constantly do hypocritical things?

I wish we would go after foreign investment, ownership, and political meddling as much as tiktok

[–] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

You have a choice to not use tiktok, in this day and age you don't really have a choice to not use a phone...

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

The former is more pressing than the latter.

[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Can the US Lawmakers do anything about the US companies harvesting my data and selling it off… please?

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Yes, they can make more money from it.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

Can they? Completely wrong question.

"Will they" is what you wanted to ask but the answer is still firmly no

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The only social platform that doesn't try to actively censor Pro-Palestinian voices. What a coincidence that it's suddenly a security risk.

Big ups to Rathbone https://www.tiktok.com/@rathbonemakesmusic/video/7289906736847129902

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So when do they plan to do something about those domestic businesses trying to manipulate citizens of America?

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

While you're not wrong about double standards, anything that discourages the use of vapid social media platforms is a win in my book. Use whatever backwards logic you like to make it happen so long as it's effective.

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

U.S. lawmakers can't force anything on foreign corporations.

If the bill passes in the House and Senate and is signed into law by President Biden, TikTok would eventually be dropped from app stores in the US if its owner doesn't sell. It also would lose access to US-based web-hosting services.

ByteDance would be banned from the U.S. market and lose it's webhosting on U.S. servers.

Also, what's with the "foreign adversary" status of China?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Also, what’s with the “foreign adversary” status of China?

China is attacking us by having a bigger economy

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Lol yea. They also maintain control over their big corpos and that must be threatening to the 9 corporations in a trench coat that the U.S. calls a government. Still, the world doesn't need any more adversarial relationships, thank you very much U.S.A.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Unironically, so much of US/China hostility boils down to corporate market share

[–] S_204@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Tik tok is at the root of so many of the social issues we're facing today. It's absolutely worse than Facebook, although both need to be addressed.

[–] Same@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sorry but this is giving 'old man yells at clouds' energy. How is tiktok any worse than any other social media platform? They're all echochambers filled with misinformation, it just what happens when you get a lot of people online.

[–] S_204@lemm.ee -1 points 8 months ago

That you're trying to 'they're all the same' bs shows how ignorant many people are on this. They're not all the same, this one is especially bad and it's not JUST because it turns you into a fucking retard when you use it.