This is about the ballot access case, not the immunity case.
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
61 points (83.5% liked)
politics
18769 readers
3731 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Correct
So then it’s an absolute garbage title that doesn’t deserve to be linked here?
The two are related though - if you insist on criminal prosecution to leverage 14A Section 3 (which seems likely, that's literally the only case it's ever been used other than public officials of the Confedereacy), then he necessarily can't simply be immune to prosecution forever or there is no method to apply 14A to a former president.
I highly doubt SCOTUS will throw the Super Tuesday primary into chaos with less than 24 hours to go.
Coney-Barrett, Alito, Thomas, Cavanaugh: Hold our beers.
Cavanaugh: Actually I want mine back. I LIKE BEER!
Squee and Donkey Dick Doug need beers too bro. Hey who wants to go rape some chicks?
Oh please, rape wasn't on the exhaustive schedule for that week, it couldn't have possibly happened
begins tearing up thinking about ol Paw and his calendars
Boof the Vote!
I mean, during the hearing every justice but Sotomayor expressed skepticism on the ruling from the lower court. The likelihood that Trump is banned from the ballot is so small, you could run a lottery off it.
At a minimum, the ballot access decision should be announced. I'd love it if they threw in the immunity case, but I doubt it.
My expectation is that they'll say "No, barring conviction, he can't be removed from the ballot, but in order for that to work, he does NOT have immunity from prosecution."
My expectation is that they’ll say “No, barring conviction, he can’t be removed from the ballot, but im order for that to work, he does NOT have immunity from prosecution.”
That would be the result most in line with legal precedent. 14A section 3 has to date only been applied to two classes of people other than Trump - public officials of the Confederacy and people convicted of a relevant crime (1919 under the Espionage Act was the last case prior to Jan 6). It has been applied to someone convicted of charges related to Jan 6.
There's no justifiable reason why Trump would have immunity from legal prosecution once he no longer holds the office of President. Once no longer in office, he is a private citizen like anyone else.
I would be deeply surprised if they ruled any other way on either issue.