this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
79 points (98.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
945 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally, I want nothing to do with them and I'm not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I moved to the Fediverse to get away from all these corpos.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JRepin@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Judging from their past and all the bad actions they have done in the past, bad for democracy, privacy, minorities and marginalised people and how openly they have a far/extreme-right bias. Well I feel extremely negative about them joining in. They were also part of destruction of another open/federated protocol in the past: they played big part in destroying XMPP/Jabber messaging. So I am afraid they will do their usual embrace, extend, and extinguish thing and their surveillance capitalist thing and yeah. no good. Best to block their instances outright.

[–] SmokeInFog@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

I was going to say, while we can't do Mich about them adopting an open protocol, please defederate with them

[–] Bjoern_Tantau@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yeah, I was thinking of Jabber as well, when I heard this. For a brief period everything was perfect. Facebook and Google were both using Jabber. And even WhatsApp was using it, I think. So if you had an account somewhere you could actually chat with all your friends, totally unimpeded.

EU should hurry up with their federation laws.

[–] wagesj45@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you can still use XMPP. i use it, my family uses it.

hate facebook all you want (i certainly do) but dont act like normies would be living in a federated utopia without them. theyd be on whatever is closed source with the most number of people and the most advertising dollars behind it and the simplest user experience. normies like easy, and its hard to blame them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Terevos@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Ack. I just said almost the same thing before I read your comment.

[–] fratermus@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are free to set up an instance. Not sure who would federate with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ataraxia937@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if they were somehow not evil, the sheer volume would technologically destroy any instance that tried to federate with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

My feeling about Meta joining the Fediverse is: 🚨DANGER!🚨

[–] averagedrunk@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

It's an easy fix. If an instance you're a part of federates with them then just move to a new instance.

Hopefully this will put instance blocking on the top of the list.

[–] hellfire103@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] Bicyclejohn@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Give meta the boot

[–] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

They see the fediverse trend gain9ng steam with the rise of Mastodon and go "Oh sheit we need to be on that for $$$". Proceed to embrace, extend, enshittify, and extinguish. Its nothing but Zuckerberg's gasping breaths to try and stay relevant as his company begins the very slow, but inevitable, backslide into technological irrelevance.

I will be leaving and/or blocking any instance that chooses to federate with anything related to Meta. They are antithetical to the entire foundation of the metaverse and they ruin everything they touch.

[–] t0fr@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm trying to get away from Facebook and meta. I'd rather they weren't remotely near me at all

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the old Microsoft strategy again - Embrace, Extend, Extinguish.

They deserve a good boot up the arse before they put one up our's.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jimrob4@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

News story I looked up. Fuck Meta and all the other money-sucking bastards that want to commodify every breath I take.

https://fediversereport.com/meta-plans-on-joining-the-fediverse-the-responses/

Block them or I’m gone

[–] Rolive@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Fuuuuuck no! This isn't actually happening right? This is just an idea I hope?

[–] ikiru@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I guess I'll just go back to reading books and watching movies full time.

Fuck all of those tech giants.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

we shouldnt let them in. they would have done decentralized service years ago if there was money in it for them. They either want us to stop or try to seize control in only way that can -> by worming in.

We must have zero-tolerance for corporations or we might as well just give up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] eta_aquarid@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meta is a corporation with a really horrible track record

and even if they didn't, it's still a corporation; it only cares for profit

I have very negative opinions on them joining

[–] cybersandwich@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

We would be opening the door to allow a large corporation to do what they've done with open source for a while. They'll privatize the public commons.

But all this work [GPL licensing] was ridiculed. Microsoft, through Github, Google and Apple pushed for MIT/BSD licensed software as the open source standard. This allowed them to use open source components within their proprietary closed products. They managed to make thousands of free software developers work freely for them. And they even received praise because, sometimes, they would hire one of those developers (like it was a "favour" to the community while it is simply business-wise to hire smart people working on critical components of your infrastructure instead of letting them work for free). The whole Google Summer of Code, for which I was a mentor multiple years, is just a cheap way to get unpaid volunteers mentor their future free or cheap workforce.

Our freedoms were taken away by proprietary software which is mostly coded by ourselves. For free. We spent our free time developing, debugging, testing software before handing them to corporations that we rever, hoping to maybe get a job offer or a small sponsorship from them. Without Non-copyleft Open Source, there would be no proprietary MacOS, OSX nor Android. There would be no Facebook, no Amazon. We created all the components of Frankenstein’s creature and handed them to the evil professor.

This article is actually pretty great.

https://ploum.net/2023-06-19-more-rms.html

And for emphasis:

We created all the components of Frankenstein’s creature and handed them to the evil professor.

[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They will datamine all federated users They will set up a CDN for uploads on their platform that will track you like v.meta.com or i.meta.com.

They will probably train LLMs off the data. They will sell the data to advertisers or data brokers. They will most likely have ads or pay to boost.

They will diverge from the standard once they have the majority of users like google does with chrome and the web.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ed2417@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It's hard for me to see anything good coming from this.

[–] Zuberi@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I say we just don't allow them on most kbin/lemmy instances. Let the people decide what info is bullshit or not.

[–] Meepster@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Nope. Just nope. It'll be the death of the Fediverse.

[–] Haily@rblind.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn’t know they’d joined. Do you have a source for this?

[–] maajmaaj@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hasn't happened yet. But there's articles stating it's in the works. Gimmie a sec and I'll edit and add here.

Edit: here ya go https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/11/meta_twitter_rival/

[–] HealGirl@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Lmao want nothing to do with them. One of the reasons I’m here is to escape these dogshit corpos

[–] BabaDuda@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] briongloid@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Meta is developing a twitter like app called Threads which will implement ActivityPub.

[–] ItsYourBoyHalo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they join the Fediverse I am leaving. We have made the Fediverse to get away from coorporations like them, letting them join us will defeat the whole point of what we have.

[–] average650@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The great thing about the fediverse is you can just not federate with them.

[–] Terevos@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

In general, it's great when companies embrace standards and open source. Though in the case of Microsoft, they just did it to gain the market share (embrace, extend, extinguish).

I'm under no illusion that they would be doing it out of the kindness of their hearts or desire to be compliant with standards.

But..i also don't think I can criticize them yet for wanting to do so.

[–] lynny@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Corporations already joined the federated internet when they adopted the web.

Even if they wanted to, they can't take over the entire fediverse, that's the point.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bappity@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

keep corporations OUT

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Just block them from federating and move on.

[–] KarsicKarl@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Will be interesting.
More likely to be noticed by calckey,misskey/friendica users who are on platforms.more similar to Facebook. Probably noticed by Mastodon users.

Not sure if kbin/Lemmy users will notice. This is based on me not noticing posts from these servers on Mastodon, calckey etc

[–] cloaker@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My problem with that is then the fediverse doesn't grow, meta controls the largest instance, and they make money off any posts that go viral here. I have to disagree for those reasons. They can go.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I feel like they'll just scrape it to feed their data driven ad machine. To them it's just a free open source of data to repackage and sell.

[–] otterpop@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

To me it sounds like they are trying to Embrace, Extend, Extinguish the fediverse. I wouldn't doubt if at first they adopted it with all the standards then started doing proprietary crap

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί