this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
79 points (98.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43909 readers
2201 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally, I want nothing to do with them and I'm not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I moved to the Fediverse to get away from all these corpos.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fubo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SuperIce@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is that necessary though? I feel like we should let them join. If they do something malicious, then we can block them. IMO, it doesn't make sense to just preemptively block them for no real reason.

[–] TrinityTek@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They've demontrated their evil nature in the past, promoting divisive and inciteful material and anything to drive engagement for the sake of advertiser dollars. I don't think we need to wait for them to do it again in the Fediverse. Better to head that shit off right up front.

[–] Cynosure@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is wholly necessary. They will start massive data mining operations if they join, harming users of all instances.

[–] bric@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Data mining can happen without any of that, everything you post in the fediverse is literally available for anyone to see. Realistically, the most harm they can do is build controlled communities that grow so huge that they drown out all of the fediverse's open communities.

[–] BrainisfineIthink@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Your most harm scenario is exactly what they want to do.

[–] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Look at what happened with Google Chrome and browser standards. We don't want a company that dominates the landscape changing the rules in their favour.

[–] zelifcam@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don’t think I could disagree more. We value the fact that this tech can be scraped, API’d and redistributed. That’s kinda point and partial cause of the protesting going with Reddit at this moment. ???

We have abilities to block it ourselves. We want options and features to customize our personal experiences as we see fit. That’s what we are trying to build here.

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. Microsoft did it before, we shouldn't let Meta do it now.