This is meaningless, pretty much anyone can be nominated. All it takes is a letter sent by any professor of history, social science, law, philosophy, or religion.
A Nobel Prize nomination is the academic equivalent of "Here, have an upvote".
this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
28 points (64.6% liked)
News
23296 readers
4469 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Is it the Norwegian guy?
Edit: Yes it's the Norwegian guy. He does this every year. Also his nominations are invalid. You're not allowed to publicise that you've nominated someone. Nominations are secret, they never announce that someone who was nominated "didn't win". I wish people would stop feeding this troll every year.
So what your saying is if I was a professor I could make bank nominating people for a fee?
Anybody can win the award as well. These awards are meaningless.
Downvoters, explain Obama, please.
Why was this award ever actually considered prestigious
A nomination is meaningless, it's not at all the same thing as receiving the award. There are 351 nominees this year, and the requirements for being nominated are almost non-existent. Even an associate professor at any college can nominate whoever they want. The one and only criteria for nomination is that a person with recognized credentials submitted the nomination. That's literally it.
Stalin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_individuals_nominated_for_the_Nobel_Peace_Prize
Apparently Czar Nicholas II also got nominated.
Ooh, and Emperor Wilhelm II.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_II,_German_Emperor
Despite strengthening Germany's position as a great power by building a powerful navy and promoting scientific innovation, Wilhelm's tactless public statements and erratic foreign policy greatly antagonized the international community and are considered by many to have substantially contributed to the fall of the German Empire. In 1914, his diplomatic brinksmanship culminated in Germany's guarantee of military support to Austria-Hungary during the July Crisis which plunged all of Europe into World War I.
I nominate Elmo.
And fettuccine alfredo.
If I had enough wealth/power I would definitely nominate a bunch of random people just to show how easy it is
You don't need wealth or power to nominate someone. Quite the opposite. You can submit a nomination if you're a university professor.
I nominate Uncle Phil and Cesar Salad
Wat.
The only one who even remotely deserves the peace prize is Assange.
The rest have all been sowing more division among lines than bringing people together. At least Wikileaks was invented to inform the public about shady shit going on in government.
That said it's not necessarily been a good thing as wars can easily happen directly as a result of leaked documents. Every government has secrets. And sometimes rooting out corruption can be pretty damned violent.
However Assange never meant to sow discord, only to inform people of problems and issues that were kept under wraps - the people deserved to know this information, even if it resulted in violent rioting.
I've read that Assange's WikiLeaks blocked any leaks which would weaken Russia for at-least a decade.
Which makes WikiLeaks part of the Russian global-cyberwarfare operation.
Beware one's "allies".
Check everything for integrity, before truly-trusting it/them.
It is possible what I'd read was itself disinformation, but WikiLeaks sure as hell was systematically helping the Kremlin's puppy Trump when election-time came around, back when it was Clinton/Trump, and that, itself, is evidence of helping Russia's design..
_ /\ _
Maybe I remember wrong, but wasn't he coordinating releases of leaked dnc data with Roger Stone? I'm gonna assume anyone dealing with Roger Stone is not on the up and up...
While that is possible. Assange definitely was all for sewing discord. His assist of trump in 2016. Wasn't necessarily strictly tied to Russia. More a personal axe he was grinding against Obama and Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. He personally went after her and the DNC. It was purely Petty, selfish and in no way to expose or bring corruption to light. It was all in service of his ego.
Huh, I didn't know that. Well that's fucked.
I guess it makes some sense though - you'd want some form of backing if you're going against the establishment, so why not the enemy of the one you're going against?
I already thought that none of them really deserved the prize, but I guess I probably shouldn't have been ranking them.
Gee, biased headline much?