this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
236 points (95.4% liked)

World News

38970 readers
3492 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 168 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Forbes dropping bombs.

Ukrainian brigades are starving for artillery ammunition—ironically because of Russia-aligned Republican lawmakers in the United States.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 92 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Yeah, I was going to comment on this, but you were faster. This is the first time that I've noticed a major media outlet connecting Republicans with Russia. So it's an open secret now?

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 47 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't think it's a secret at all anymore.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's what an open secret is. Everyone knows it but few people are willing to acknowledge it publicly.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 months ago
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Hasn't this been an open secret for years? Does no one remember Paul Ryan talking about Russian payola to trump and other Republican traitors back in 2016?

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I can’t believe I’m actually gonna say this, but I miss that guy. He was a bastard, but at least he was a “normal” politician and not some batshit psycho.

And he retired to run a weed company iirc. wtf.

[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago

I can’t find the weed company on Wikipedia (you could be right, I just looked cursorily), but he’s on the board of directors at Fox News. Also I learned that he’s related through marriage to both Ketanji Brown-Jackson and a very hardcore George Wallace stan.

All in all, I should not have read his Wikipedia, it’s destroyed the hope that I had, that he might have become normal and would be interested in fixing things.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee -5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The comment is about headlines, not open secrets. I know you read the comment, why did you respond like this?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The comment is about headlines, not open secrets.

This is the first time that I've noticed a major media outlet connecting Republicans with Russia. So it's an open secret now?

I was responding to a comment talking about the open secret of Russian connections to republicans, not about the headline. Are you sure you responded to the right comment?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

Surprising coming from Forbes, honestly

It’s the first time I’ve noticed a major non-liberal media outlet pointedly connecting Republicans with Russia. Which is a pretty big deal tbh.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago (1 children)

GLSDB is a pretty nice weapon. Combines the range and capability of a bomb with a glide kit boosted to altitude via a rocket. This type of weapon is new for the US as they normally have air superiority, so boosting the glide bombs from the ground wasn't previously needed as they would be carried up by an aircraft instead.

[–] itwasawednesday@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sorry for ignorance, genuine question, how is this different to a short range missile?

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

A short range missile (such as GMLRS, which HIMARS also fires) does not have the glide kit. This means the missile is much faster, but for maximum range the missile has to follow a (vaguely) ballistic trajectory. With the glide kit, it can trade much of that speed into additional range by gliding to the target. This means GLSDB gliders can hit targets at further range, but being slower, it's easier to shoot down and makes it less able to hit extremely time sensitive targets. IIRC, GMLRS missiles have a time-to-target of 2-3 min from launch, while GLSDB gliders have (a guesstimate on my part) more like 10-15min from launch. GLSDB gliders can also sacrifice some of the range to loop around and hit targets from different angles, while GMLRS missiles are pretty much only top-down. GLSDB gliders are also significantly cheaper than GMLRS missiles.

GLSDB gliders go 93 miles.

GMLRS missiles go 57 miles.

[–] itwasawednesday@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Appreciate the informative response! I'm ashamed to say it hadn't ever occurred to me that a missile still needs to follow a ballistic path. I've been fooled by movies without realising the nonsense in that, given they have no 'wings'. Control surfaces aside of course. Thanks!

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For additional reference, we now have video of a GLSDB in action in Ukraine.

[–] itwasawednesday@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Holy shit yeah that's a step up from drone grenades footage, nice!

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Seems rather unwieldy for a weapon. Couldn't they make it shorter?

[–] Dempf@lemmy.zip 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Best I can do is 45 miles.

[–] TheRealLinga@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

And it'll only cost you tree-fiddy

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I saw the photo and thought this was one of those "Taylor Swift going to X" memes. I'll see myself out.

[–] holycrap@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago

"Taylor Swift visits some Russians"

[–] pan_troglodytes@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago

just like Germany's V2 rockets! but using proven tech