why did notion buy it? to shut it down?
this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
300 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
59373 readers
8326 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
They've just done the same with a calendar app that I forget the name of. They then rereleased it under their own brand.
They appear to be on an unspoken mission to challenge Google's suite of apps, so I'd hazard a guess that email tech is a part of that puzzle (along with calendar)
Cron. They didn't shut it down though, they just suddenly transitioned it. I'd just started using Cron when they did it and it was very unexpected for me.
I mean that sounds pretty reasonable, could they just not think of a name that wasn't already in prevalent use? Was the goal to be unsearchable for anyone trying to find it?
That's like creating a reminders app and naming it task manager.
They renamed it Notion calendar, but Cron had pretty solid SEO. I much preferred its old name and theme.
Well that's great for them, but that also means that people searching for the cron that has had that name for 50 years are going to get irrelevant results for a calendar app.
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
That's the one, and you're right, it is currently a rebrand but ultimately the same product.
I think having separate apps is the wrong way to go for their "integrate everything in one place" philosophy, over the longer term. I'm eager to see what they do with it next.
There mission must be copying Google killing perfectly good products.
Most likely with the goal of getting acquired by Google or MS or something. Exit strategies eating exit strategies
Yes! Also because capitalism is the bestest, most innovative economic system ever!
Perhaps interested in the people working there and wanting to create their own email service from the ground up?
Their generous offering of 10gigabytes of free storage along with a private, ad-free, end-to-end encrypted experience always sounded too good to be true. There was no way they could sustain that business model long term. At least they're giving users enough time to jump ship and have not sold their data to Notion (judging by their twitter replies).
There is a not-insignificant amount of start ups and small projects out there looking to hook the privacy-minded crowd seeking smaller, independent replacements for Microsoft /Google/Apple's various services and suites.
And that's good in the sense there's more options, but some of them (not all, but some) don't seem to be from people that truly believe in their product and intend to maintain it long term, they just want to get enough users to get acquired.
Stage 1 is done. Stage 2 is beginning:
now here's how a platform dies. first it's good to its users. then it abuses those users to make things better for business customers.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/rimtaSgGz_4?t=128
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Is there a database tracking companies that start out with good intentions and then eventually gets bought out or sells out their initial values? I’m wondering what the deciding factors are, and how long it takes for them to turn.
good intentions
I’m sorry to tell you that nearly every startup today begins with an exit strategy from the start. The founders of skiff were probably waiting for the right number of zeros in this case
Not a db, I just want to share one reason that happened to the startup I was working at.
The owners were thinking about keep business as usually which means paying more to the employees or scaling up which is very expensive, they only had small to medium sized companies as their customers(but many). Then this big company came from a different country, they were on a shopping spree buying a lot of companies(scaling up and taking over the market). The owners of the company I worked at were soon 65 or above 65 so they thought that it was a opportunity. Because if they sell then they don't have to be worried about money after retirement. So they did. But they did think the company would be taken care of, but I think they also looked away from the bad stuff, wishing this would be great. Almost everyone left the company after a year or two (myself included), it was a sinking ship. Same goes for the other companies they acquired.
Tldr; selling the company to get retirement money while hoping the company will be taken cared of. Took only a year for ppl to leave because of how bad it was.
this is every for-profit company in existence, i assume. why do you think everything on the internet is proprietary now? it used to be open protocols, re: email, usenet and IRC. now it's discord and facebook.
Imagine a future where every home user can run a FreedomBox or something similar with decentralized services like email with your own custom email domain, XMPP and more. No more exploitation by commercial companies.
🌞
It’s a nice thought but if everyone were to manage their own email server (and other things) we would have SO much more security problems in general.
I spend a not insignificant amount of my work week now dealing with quarantined or bounced mail from other companies that can't or won't set up DKIM, SPF, and DMAC properly. Not individuals, companies, with IT departments.
You'll never get most people to properly manage their own server.
Prolly cause their I.T. is Ian Trevor, a guy who knows how to boot up the mail server box.
load more comments
(3 replies)
That used to be a thing until everyone started drooling over cloud based services, which I never trusted but time marches on and services for the masses are much needed.
load more comments
(2 replies)
>free thinkers
Lol. Lmao even.
This sort of thing is why I went with an established, for-pay email provider (fastmail). I mean, they might still sell out if someone made them an attractive enough offer, but they're not looking for offers the way a recent startup would be, and it's obvious where they get the cashflow to sustain the business from.
I've seen this happen far too many times.
Acquired/Acqui-hired
Examples: GeoCities, Posterous, Brace.io, Roon, Viddy, Qwiki, Yahoo! Voices, Blip.tv, Giphy
Situation: Company A buys Company B, employees and all. Together, they will continue their incredible journey to make the world a better place. A few months/years/seconds later, Company B is dead and its employees are either laid off or reassigned to Company A projects.
https://wiki.archiveteam.org/index.php/A_Million_Ways_to_Die_on_the_Web
I've worked at companies like this. Company B might actually be turning a good profit and benefiting millions of users in a charitable space, but it would look bad on the books to sell it, and it lowers the value of the company overall to keep it.
Belligerent toilet capitalism.
I used Notion for managing my D&D campaign until I noticed I was approaching the limitations of what the free tier offered. That sent me looking for an alternative and I ended up settling on Skiff Pages (at that time I don't even think they had email, drive, etc). It didn't have all the features that Notion did, but it was functional, easy to use, and they were frequently adding improvements.
It's kind of funny to me that they ended up getting swallowed by Notion in the end. I'm just glad that I've long since switched over to Obsidian. My Markdown files can't get bought by Notion . 😂
How much for your markdown files?
+1 for obsidian! Have you tried out text generator plugin? Uses GPT api's. Haven't gotten into D&D but seems like it'd be a great tool for DMs to help make content.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I never really trusted them. Now I know why.
The enshit intensifies
We need banks that specifically are meant to allow the workers of a company to buy their company and turn it into a collective. Not that the workers can sell the shares but they own it in the sense that they can democratically determine how profits are spend and what managers are hired / elected. Just a loan which just requires printing a little more money which we do all the time.
That would solve so many inefficiencies and amoralities in the current economy.
Big fish eat the little ones, big fish eat the little ones
Not my problem give me some....
Dang. Is Proton the most reliable alternative when deGoogling, then? Skiff looked promising, aside from having kind of a dumb name.
Used it for a little bit. Seemed really nice, but it was quite janky so I backed out and went back to Mailbox. Feel like I dodged a bullet.
How in the hells do you do E2E encrypted email anyway? Email is a pretty well-defined protocol, and that protocol is not encrypted.
We've had GPG for a while, but that requires the other user also be on a platform that supports it. Was E2E only for other users of Skiff?
I believe Skiff would automatically start using end to end encryption when it was available, without any user needing to enable it for any specific email, using the Web Key Directory standard: https://github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org/blob/1634bea9d2a66ef5804b68d18d4218e0b7a8b806/docs/email.md#openpgp-compatible-services
It's not good for me that an email provider that supports that is undergoing dramatic changes, as an open standard that protects my privacy is more useful when it is used with more services.
undergoing dramatic changes
I mean they are just shutting down completely. Notion is not coming up with their own E2E solution, they are just acquiring them to kill them, probably because skiff pages was a light competitor. I don’t know if it’s the founders or investors of skiff who pushed this decision, but it’s a sign of the shitty system either way.
I haven't used Skiff myself, but I would guess that that's what it was. Proton and Tuta also feature E2E encryption, and it's exactly how it works there, too.
load more comments
(3 replies)
The entire service didn’t feel very reliable from the start. And look what happened.
view more: next ›