this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
12 points (92.9% liked)

Games

16715 readers
1235 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sharpiemarker@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

A cinematic 24 fps. Sense of pride and accomplishment sold separately. Some assembly required.

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

That's a lot of words talking about 30fps and not really new techs used.

[–] briongloid@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

It means they can't get it running at 60 while still looking good.

[–] theevan117@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

30fps is fine with a corresponding level of graphical and world fidelity, I would love to see a 40fps / 120hz option as it feels so much better than 30 fps and is likely achievable on consoles.

The FF16 demo is a perfect example of an awful 60 fps option as it dips well below that constantly and makes the whole presentation so much more blurred. A well designed / curated 30 fps mode works for slower paced games, it'll be interesting to see PC performance and whether higher frame rates are accessible on reasonable hardware.

[–] ChojinDSL@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally I'm fine with 30fps when a game is designed with that in mind.

Obviously, with really fast paced twitchy games, that's not really an option. But for something like this, I think it's fine.

[–] theevan117@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah totally, well implemented motion blur goes a long way to making 30 fps feel better than it should. The 40 fps versions of horizon and miles morales feel like a great compromise that I wish more games implemented.

The big thing is that the game has to be REALLY well optimized to justify 30 fps only. If starfield still has gameplay or performance issues then it'll be a pretty rough scenario.

[–] narc0tic_bird@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

As long as the PC version features unlocked FPS and does so without introducing glitches because they thought tying physics to the frame rate was a good idea or whatever.